Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Subject areas suitable for publication in Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi (JPP) include, but are not limited to the following fields in psychology research:

  • Islamic psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Disaster Psychology
  • Other relevant areas of psychology research

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Editorial Board

Journal Manager and Editor
Harri Santoso.,S.Psi.,M.Ed - UIN Ar Raniry - Indonesia

Section Editor
Fatmawati Fadli.,S.Psi.,BSc (Hons) M.Sc - - UIN Ar Raniry - Indonesia
Iyulen Febry Juani.,S.Psi.,M.Psi Psikolog - UIN Ar Raniry - Indonesia

Internal Reviewer
Prof. Eka Srimulyani.,PhD - UIN Ar Raniry - Indonesia
Dr. Fachri.,M.Ed - UIN Ar Raniry - Indonesia
Dr. Muhammad Nasir.,M.Hum - UIN Ar Raniry - Indonesia
Jasmadi Ali.,S.Psi.,M.Psi.,Psikolog - UIN Ar Raniry - Indonesia
Julianto Saleh.,S.Ag.,M.Si - UIN Ar Raniry - Indonesia

Eksternal Reviewer ( Mitra Bebestari)
Prof. Drs. Subandhi.,PhD - UGM - Indonesia
Dr. Taufik Kasturi - UMM - Indonesia
Prof. Dr. Ahmad Mubarak - UIN Jakarta - Indonesia
Dr. Tjut Rifa Meutia - UI - Indonesia
Dr. Fonny Dameaty - UM - Malaysia

OJS Team and Circulation
Tubin, S.T
Mariani.,S.IP
Onni.,S.E

 

Announcements

 

Author Guidelines

A. The Manuscript General Guidelines

The manuscript text general guidelines are as follows:
1. The writing format that used in Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi follows the format applied by APA 6th Edition (American Psychological Association).
2. The manuscript does not contain any plagiarism element. The editorial board will directly reject the text that indicates plagiarism.
3. The submission and the publication processes are free, without any additional fees.
4. The manuscript that has been written under the guidelines of Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi (in MS Word format, use this article template) must be submitted through Online Submission System using Open Journal System (OJS) on the E-journal portal (http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi) choose only one procedure. Then, register as one of the author or reviewer in the “Register” bottom.
5. The manuscript article writing guidelines and template can be downloaded. (.doc) format. The template and the guidlines of the article writing are available in MS Word.
6. The manuscript online submission can be viewed in the part of online submission guidelines below.
7. Manuscripts can be written in Indonesian or English by using good and correct grammar rules. Writing manuscripts in English is generally in the form of past tense.
8. Manuscripts written in English by authors whose native language is not English, must be sent to the English Editor for prior review of the grammar.
9. Manuscript must be written in MS Word format with A4 (210 x 297 mm) page size, single-column with text layout as simple as possible. It is recommended to use only the writing facilities provided in MS Word (bold, italics, subscript, superscript, equation, etc.).
10. All parts of the text in the manuscript are written using the Times New Roman font.
11. The length of the scientific manuscripts should be approximately 5000 words or 12-15 pages, including the accompanying figures, graphs and tables (conditional).
12. Figures and tables are just for explaining things that are not easily explained in the text. Please ensure that the quality and size of the images presented are sufficient to produce good print quality.
13. Authors whose scripts will be published in the Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi will receive 10 copies of the printed manuscript. Authors must be willing to buy a minimum of 10 copies of the printed Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi containing their writings check the letter.
14. It is suggested to the author who will submit the manuscript in Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi to use the following reference tools: Mendeley, Grammarly, dan EndNote.
15. Abbreviations: In general, terms should not be abbreviated unless they are used repeatedly and the abbreviation is helpful to the reader. Initially, use the word in full, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. Thereafter use the abbreviation only.
16. English Language Editing Service: Authors who are English speaking should consider using a professional editing service. A clear and concise language will help editors and reviewers concentrate on the scientific content of your paper and thus smooth the peer review process. Authors are highly recommended to use native speaker language and style editors who are experienced in their own specific fields.




B. Instructions

1. The terms in a foreign language or regional language in the text are written in italic letters.
2. Literature review is not included as part of the manuscript structure. Thus, citation of important literature can be integrated in the introduction section or in the discussion.
3. The citation of literature written in the discussion section should be as simple yet necessary as the content that is preferred in this section is the discussion about the result of the found data analysis.

C. Preparing The Submission

Parts of the Manuscript

The contents and systematics of the written manuscripts are described narratively using the essay format in paragraph form, and do not use detailed grammatical systems such as thesis/dissertation (without subtitle numbering) and should contain the following components:

1. The title of the manuscript:
The title should be concise and straightforward to describe the content of the manuscript. It may use attractive and creative titles to attract readers (maximum 14 words).

2. Author Name
Write the full name of the author without a title, the institution where the author work/study (affiliation) and the author's address of the correspondent (e-mail).

3. Abstract
Abstract must be written in English and in Bahasa Indonesia with 1.0 line spacing and a maximum of 150 words containing hypothesis, research subject, method and result.

4. Keywords
The main words in the study, can be taken from the research variables, the characteristics of the research subject, and the referred theory (Please provide five keywords, written in alphabetical order)

5. Introduction
The introduction must contain preleminary, problems and theoritical (sortly and consecutively) a general background and a literature review (state of the art) as the basic of the brand new research question, statements of the brand new scientific article, main research problems, and the hypothesis. In the final part of the introduction, the purpose of the article writing should be stated. In the scientific article format, it does not allow to write down the references as in the research report. They should be represented in the literature review to show the brand new of the scientific article.

6.Research Methods
The method is implemented to solve problems, including analytic methods. The methods used in the problem solving of the research are explained in this part.

7. Result
This part consists of the research results and how they are disscussed. The results obtained from the research have to be supported by sufficient data. The research results and the discovery must be the answers or the research hypothesis stated previously in the introduction part.

8. Discussion
This part consists of the research results and how they are disscussed. The results obtained from the research have to be supported by sufficient data. The research results and the discovery must be the answers or the research hypothesis stated previously in the introduction part.

9. Conclusion
This section is concise, clear and solid based on the results of the study (a maximum of 1 page), made in paragraph (not numerical) form, containing the findings as syntheses between the results of the analysis and the results of the study, and further highlighting the novelty contributing to the development of psychology.

10. References
Manuscripts should follow the latest edition of the American Psychological Association (APA) Style Manual. The References List is a Reference List not a Bibliography, it shall contain all sources referred to in the Manuscript, and shall not contain unused sources. The reference list contains all references in text originating from sources that are: (a) relevant, (b) at least 80% up to date (last 10 years), and (c) primary (at least 80%), mainly from the journal Manuscript.
Below are the examples of writing a reference from the following source:

(a) Journal without DIgital Object Identifier (DOI)

Light, M. A., & Light, I. H. (2008). The geographic expansion of Mexican immigration in the United States and its implications for local law enforcement. Law Enforcement Executive Forum Journal, 8(1), 73-82.

Arbiyah, N., Nurwianti, F., & Oriza, D. (2008). Hubungan bersyukur dengan subjective well being pada penduduk miskin. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 14(1), 11-24.

(b) Journal with Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Herbst-Damm, K. L., & Kulik, J. A. (2005). Volunteer support, marital status, and the survival times of terminally ill patients. Health Psychology, 24(1), 225-229. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.771073

(c) Magazine Manuscript

Chamberlin, J., Novotney, A., Packard, E., & Price, M. (2008, May). Enhancing worker well-being: Occupational health psychologists convene to share their research on work, stress, and health. Monitor on Psychology, 39(5). 26-29.

(d) Online Magazine Manuscript

Clay, R. (2008, June). Science vs. ideology: Psychologists fight back about the misuse of research. Monitor on Psychology, 39(6). Diunduh dari: http://www.apa.org/monitor/ tanggal 10 Agustus 2012.

(e) Newspaper Manuscript (No Author)

Six sites meet for comprehensive anti-gang initiative conference. (2006, November/December). OJJDP News @ a Glance. Diunduh dari: http://www.ncjrs.gov/htmllojjdp/news_acglance/216684/topstory.htmI tanggal 10 Agustus 2012

(f) Unpublished Thesis/Disertation

Rimawati, A. B. (2010). Model teoretik prasangka sosial. (Disertasi tidak dipubli¬kasikan). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

(g) Book

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi (ed.2). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

(h) Book (with Editor)

Cone, J. D. (1999). Observational assessment: Measure development and research issues. Dalam P. C. Kendall, J. N. Butcher, & G. N. Holmbeck (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (hlm. 183-223). New York: Wiley.

(i) Unpublished Manuscript

Nuryati, A., & Indati, A. (1993). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi prestasi belajar. Manuskrip tidak dipublikasikan, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

11. Publication Process After Accepatnce

Accepted Article Received in Production
When an accepted article is received by Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi production team, the corresponding author will receive an email asking them to login . The author will be asked to sign a publication license at this point.

Accepted Articles
The journal offers Accepted Articles service for all manuscripts. This service ensures that accepted ‘in press’ manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, prior to copy-editing or typesetting. Accepted Articles are published online a few days after final acceptance, appear in PDF format only, and are given a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), which allows them to be cited and tracked. After publication of the final version article (the article of record), the DOI remains valid and can still be used to cite and access the article.

Proofs
Once the paper is typeset, the author will receive an email notification with the URL to download a PDF typeset page proof, as well as associated forms and full instructions on how to correct and return the file.
Please note that the author is responsible for all statements made in their work, including changes made during the editorial process – authors should check proofs carefully.


Early View
The journal offers rapid publication via Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi Early View service. Note there may be a delay after corrections are received before the article appears online, as Editors also need to review proofs. Once the article is published on Early View, no further changes to the article are possible. The Early View article is fully citable and carries an online publication date and DOI for citations.

12. Post Publication

Access and Sharing
When the article is published online:
• The author receives an email alert (if requested).
• The author will have free access to the paper (after accepting the Terms & Conditions of use, they can view the article).
• The link to the published article can be shared through social media.
• The corresponding author and co-authors can nominate up to ten colleagues to receive a publication alert and free online access to the article.

 

Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Authors are not required to pay an Article Submission Fee as part of the submission process to contribute to review costs.

Article Publication: 0.00 (IDR)
If this paper is accepted for publication, management will pay as reward or gift as Indonesia Ministry Finance Regulation 2017

 

Publication Ethics

Ethics of Publication in Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi

All parties involved in the publishing/publication process of the Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi i.e. Managers, Editor, Mitra Bebestari, and the Author must understand and adhere to the norms/ethics of scientific publication. This statement is based on LIPI Chief Regulations No. 5 of 2014 on the Code of Ethics of Scientific Publications. Scientific work for publication, in essence must uphold the three ethical values in the publication, namely; (i) Neutrality, which is free from conflict of interest in the management of publications; (ii) Justice, which gives the right of authorship to those entitled as author / authorship; and (iii) Honesty, which is free of duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in the publication.

Information:
A. Duplication is the publication of findings as original in more than one channel without any refinement, content update, data, and/or no reference to previous publications;
B. Fabrication is the act of making data from non-existent into as if there is (falsification of research results) that is composing, recording and/or announcing the results of research without proving to have done the research process;
C. Falsification is to alter the data with the intention to fit the desire of the researcher (research data falsification) i.e. manipulate research materials, tools or processes, alter or exclude data or results in such a way that the research is not accurately presented in the research note;
D. Plagiarism is categorized as a misappropriation of ideas, thoughts, processes, objects and research results, whether in the form of data or words, including material obtained through limited research (confidential), proposed research plans and manuscripts without expressing appreciation.



Journal Manager Duties and Responsibilities

Determining the name of the journal, the scope of the scholarship, keberkalaan, and accreditation.
1. Determining Editorial Board membership.
2. Defining the relationship between Publisher, Editor, Mitra Bebestari, and others in a contract.
3. Respecting the things that are confidential, both for contributing researchers, Author, Editor, or Mitra Bebestari.
4. Applying the norms and provisions on intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
5. Reviewing the bulletin policy and submit it to the Author, Editorial Board, Mitra Bebestari, and Readers.
6. Creating behavior code guides for Editor and Mitra Bebestari.
7. Publishing bulletins regularly.
8. Ensuring availability of funding sources for sustainability of the issuance of bulletins.
9. Establishing network of cooperation and marketing.
10. Preparing permissions and other legality aspects.

Duties and Responsibilities of the Editor
1. Meeting the needs of Readers and Authors,
2. Seeking continuous improvement of publication quality,
3. Implementing processes to ensure the quality of published papers,
4. Prioritizing freedom of giving opinion objectively,
5. Maintaining the integrity of the author’s academic track record.
6. Delivering corrections, clarifications, withdrawals and apologies as required,
7. Responsible for the style and format of the paper, while the contents and all statements in the paper is the responsibility of the author,
8. Actively seek the opinions of Authors, Readers, Mitra Bebestari, and Editorial Board members to improve the quality of publications,
9. Encouraging assessment of the journal if there is any findings,
10. Supporting initiatives to reduce research and publication errors by having the author attach the Ethical Clearance form,
11. Supporting initiatives to educate Researchers on the ethics of publications,
12. Reviewing the effects of publications policies on the attitudes of the Author and Mitra Bebestari as well as improve them to increase responsibility and minimize errors,
13. Having an open mind to new opinions or views of others who may be contrary to personal opinion,
14. Trying to not defend their own opinion, author or any third party that may result in a non-objective decision,
15. Encouraging the Authors, in order to make improvements of their papers until it is worth publishing.

Duties and Responsibilities of Mitra Bebestari/ Reviewer
1. Receiving an assignment from the Editor to review the paper and submit the review to the Editor, as the material for determining the feasibility of a paper to be published.
2. The reviewers shall not review any paper which is involving them, whether directly or indirectly
3. Maintaining the author's privacy by not disseminating the results of corrections, suggestions, and recommendations by providing criticism, suggestions, feedback, and recommendations.
4. Encouraging the Authors to make improvements to the papers.
5. Reviewing the papers that have been improved in accordance with the standards that have been determined.
6. The papers are reviewed in time according to the standard criteria of writing scientific papers (data collection methods, author's legality, conclusions, etc.).
7. Mitra Bebestari is expected to be able to identify the manuscripts published in other scientific journals, in order to avoid duplicate publication.
8. In reviewing the manuscript, Mitra Bebestari should show the reasons for the rejection of a manuscript.
9. Mitra Bebestari should provide constructive feedback on the received manuscript with the improvement.
10. Before accepting / rejecting a manuscript, it is a must to consider whether the text is appropriate to the scientific field of a reviewer/ mitra bebestari, and whether they are able to commit and complete the assignment by the deadline.
11. The results of the review will assist the editor in deciding whether the manuscript is worthy to be published or not.
12. Reviewers can summarize reviewed manuscripts by providing specific comments and suggestions, including about layout and format, Title, Abstract, Introduction, Graphical Abstract and / or Overview, Methods, statistical errors, Results, Conclusions / Discussions, Language and References. If a reviewer found a suspicion, it needs to be directly conveyed and explained to the editor as detail as possible.
13. In making the recommendation of the result of a manuscript that has been reviewed, reviewers are requested to explain in detail about their reasons and considerations in deciding whether the manuscript is accepted, rejected or revised.

Duties and Responsibilities of the Author
1. Ensuring that the entries in the Authors’ list meet the criteria as Authors.
2. A person listed as an author for publication should have the following criteria: (a) contribute significantly to planning, drafting, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data; (B) contribute significantly to the preparation, revision and finalization of the text; And (c) be responsible for the accuracy and integrity of scientific writing.
3. Inclusion of a person's name as an author will be discussed early to avoid disputes
4. Stating the origin of the resources (including funding), either directly or indirectly.
5. Explaining the limitations in the study
6. Responding to comments made by Mitra Bebestari professionally and on time.
7. Informing the Editor in case of retracting the manuscript that has been submitted.
8. Making a statement that the manuscript submitted for publication are original, have not been published anywhere in any language, and are not in the process of submitting to other Publishers.

Screening Plagiarism
1. Plagiarism screening will be conducted using AiMOS 2.0 application system. AiMOS 2.0 is a plagiarism detection system application used to detect the same word usage between source document with comparative document (https://aimos.ugm.ac.id/user-management/auth/login).
2. Plagiarism screening will also be conducted using google schoolar plagiarsm checker.




Digital Archiving

This journal utilizes the Indonesia One Search (IOS), Indonesian Scientific Journal Database (ISJD), and Indonesian Publication Index (IPI) system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

 

Budapest Open Access Initiative

In response to the growing demand to make research free and available to anyone with a computer and an internet connection, a diverse coalition has issued new guidelines that could usher in huge advances in the sciences, education, medicine, and health.

The recommendations were developed by leaders of the Open Access movement, which has worked for the past decade to provide the public with unrestricted, free access to scholarly research—much of which is publicly funded. Making the research publicly available to everyone—free of charge and without most copyright and licensing restrictions—will accelerate scientific research efforts and allow authors to reach a larger number of readers.The recommendations are the result of a meeting organized by the Open Society Foundations to mark the tenth anniversary of Budapest Open Access Initiative, which first defined Open Access. The recommendations include the development of Open Access policies in institutions of higher education and in funding agencies, the open licensing of scholarly works, the development of infrastructure such as Open Access repositories and creating standards of professional conduct for Open Access publishing. The recommendations also establish a new goal of achieving Open Access as the default method for distributing new peer-reviewed research in every field and in every country within ten years’ time.Translations of the recommendations have already been made in several languages, with more to follow. For more on the recommendations, please see the press release as well as a blog post by Peter Suber which provides additional background on the Open Access movement.

​Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative

An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.

For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access.

The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

While the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian.

To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies.

I. Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents.

II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives.

​Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived.

The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources.

We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish.

February 14, 2002
Budapest, Hungary

Leslie Chan: Bioline International
Darius Cuplinskas: Director, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Michael Eisen: Public Library of Science
Fred Friend: Director Scholarly Communication, University College London
Yana Genova: Next Page Foundation
Jean-Claude Guédon: University of Montreal
Melissa Hagemann: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Stevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a Montreal
Rick Johnson: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)
Rima Kupryte: Open Society Institute
Manfredi La Manna: Electronic Society for Social Scientists
István Rév: Open Society Institute, Open Society Archives
Monika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant
Sidnei de Souza: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline International
Peter Suber: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship Newsletter
Jan Velterop: Publisher, BioMed Central

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Double Blind Review

Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi: Scientific Journal Using Double Blind Review, where the author and reviewers don't know each other, This method is considered more effective in order to maintain consistency.

 

Plagiarism Checker

Psikoislamedia: Jurnal Psikologi will check for plagiarism using various available tools, including Google Search and http://www.plagiarismchecker.com/

 

Content Licensing, Copyright and Permissions

Content Licensing, Copyright and Permissions



Psikoislamedia: Jurnal Psikologi use licence CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

This license permits anyone to compose, repair, and make derivative creation even for commercial purposes, as long as they include the creation of credit and license derivative under similar conditions.



On the development process, Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi  recognizes that free access is better than paid access. Therefore Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi provide open access to all the parties to broaden and deepen knowledge adequately through existing articles in this journal.



Creative Commons License

All Publications