THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RESILIENCY TRAINING TO IMPROVE FAMILY WELL-BEING AMONG WOMEN EXPERIENCED SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN ACEH

Sexual harassment has many negative impacts on the victims, both physically and psychologically. Women as victims of sexual harassment feel difficulties when they interact in social environment. The psychological impact on the victim will result in prolonged trauma and depression which can then lead to unhealthy attitudes such as insecurity, excessive fear, and disturbed mental conditions. For this reason, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness of resiliency training to improve family well-being among women victims of sexual violence in Aceh. The number of participants recruited were 7 women who have experienced sexual violence in PSAA Aceh. The research design used a one group pretestposttest design and the data were collected using family well-being scale. The results of data analysis indicated that the provision of resiliency training did not have a significant contribution on increasing family well-being. This could be explained because the incidents of sexual violence experienced by the subjects have happened several years ago, so they have adapted to their families to the presence of children born from the sexual violence.


Introduction
Edgar (in Milligan, Fabian, Coope, & Errington, 2006), mentions the term family well-being as a concept for the realization of objective well-being and subjective well-being in the family. Objective well-being includes the achievement of material and physical needs, while subjective well-being includes the achievement of social and emotional needs in a family.
Well-being in the family is the main key to achieve peacefulness for each of family member, both parents and children. Sadly, this condition is not always easily achieved by every individual, especially families who have extreme problems such as domestic violence and sexual violence. This family problem often occurs in the international, national, and local contexts, including Aceh. According to data from The World Bank (2013), the female ISSN:2548-4044 Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi Volume 06 Nomor 01, 2021 population is increasing day by day, so the issues related to the protection of women become a focus and an important topic for discussion. Data on the number of female population based on statistics shows an increase since five years with most countries in the world, and it reported that the female population is getting bigger than the male population, although there are some countries that still have the same or smaller ratio. From 2009 to 2013, the percentage of women population ratio lies between the interval of 51% and 53% (The World Bank, 2013). What needs further attention is the increasing number of cases of sexual violence against women, both in America and Asia (Chancellor & Ramaul, 2013;International, 2013;Nybergh, Taft, Enander, & Krantz, 2013;Rajani, Rani, & Flip, 2011;Rezaie, 2013;Thurman et al., 2003). The World Health Organization (WHO) in its research "A Global Voice for Women Studies" states that 1 in 3 women in the world have the risk of being hit, raped, or abused during their lifetime (International, 2013).

Methods
The design used in this study was a one group pretest-posttest design. The pretest measurement was carried out once before the intervention administration process, while the post-test measurement was performed after the intervention process to determine the pattern of effects arising from the intervention given. Measurement of family well-being was developed using the concepts of objective well-being and subjective well-being from Edgar's theory (in  which was later improved by Hafiza (2018). This scale consists of 4 aspects, namely: objective well-being, the quality of relationships between family members, regulation of positive and negative emotions, and life satisfaction.
The score for family well-being was obtained from the total score of all aspects of the family well-being scale. This score showed the quality of family well-being among women victims of sexual violence. The higher the total score obtained, the higher the quality of family well-being. Likewise, the lower the total score obtained, the lower the quality of family well-being. The data analysis technique used in this study was the Paired Sample T-Test analysis with the help of the SPSS for Windows version 20.0 program. This analysis was used to see if there were differences in family well-being between pretest and posttest.

Demographic Data of Research Respondents
The resiliency training group consisted of 7 subjects who lived at the PSAA Darussa'adah.
The following is the demographic data of the research subjects.

a. Subject NV
Based on the family well-being scale, it was known that NV had a score of 11 at pretest which was in the low category, then increased 3 points at posttest to 14 which still classified in the low category. It could also be seen that at the time of the pretest NV got a score above the group mean. Meanwhile, at the posttest, the NV subject got a score below the group mean.

Figure 1. Comparison of Family Well-Being Scores between NV and Group Means b. Subject NS
Based on the family well-being scale, it was known that NS had a score of 10 at pretest which was included in the low category, then decreased 1 point at posttest to 9 and was still classified in the low category. It was also seen that at the time of the pretest NS got a score below the group mean. Likewise, at the time of the posttest, the NS subject got a score below the group mean. Based on the family well-being scale, it was known that TN had a score of 14 at the pretest which was in the high category, then at the posttest the score was still the same but was classified in the low category. It could also be seen that at the time of the pretest TN got a score above the group mean. Likewise, at the posttest the TN subject got a score above the group mean.

d. Subject NR
Based on the family well-being scale, it was known that NR subject had a score of 12 at the pretest which was included in the low category, then it fell at the posttest to 11 and was still classified in the low category. It could also be seen that at the pretest NR scored above the group mean. However, at posttest, the NR subject scored below the group mean.

Discussion
The series of resilience trainings given to women victims of sexual violence at PSAA turned out to have no significant effect on their family well-being. This was indicated by the results of the Paired Sample T-Test analysis which did not show a significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores in family well-being with t = -1.109; p = 0.31 (p> 0.05). This could be explained because the incidents of sexual violence experienced by the subjects have happened several years ago, so they have adapted to their families to the presence of children born from the sexual violence. This also could be seen from the MT subject who had the highest family well-being score at the posttest. Based on the results of the interview during the training, MT admitted that her parents tried to cover up about the presence of the MT child from their closest relatives and take care of the child like their own.
Meanwhile, MT is given the opportunity to continue their high school education.

Conclusion and Recommendation
Based on the results of data analysis and research discussion, it could be concluded that the provision of resilience training did not have a significant effect on improving family wellbeing among women victims of sexual violence. Based on the results obtained in this study, there are several suggestions given, namely: (1) In order to see a comparison of resiliency