Constructing Gender Authority in Modern Islam: A Sociology of Knowledge Analysis of Yusuf al-Qaradhawi and Nazaruddin Umar on Women’s Political Participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/arj.v5i2.32548Keywords:
Al-Qaradhawi, Islamic Gender Discourse, Nazaruddin Umar, Religious Authority, Sociology of Knowledge, Women's Political ParticipationAbstract
This study examines how religious authority shapes gender discourse in contemporary Muslim society through a comparative analysis of Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi and Nazaruddin Umar's thoughts on women's political participation. Using a sociology of knowledge framework integrated with Bourdieu's field theory and Giddens' structuration theory, this study answers three questions: how is epistemic authority built in different field positions, how do socio-religious structures shape intellectual production, and do different approaches contribute to the transformation of gender discourse? The analysis reveals three main findings. First, both scholars successfully established credible positions that enabled women's eligibility to run for president through contrasting strategies: Al-Qaradhawi accumulated orthodox reformist capital in the field of transnational scholars, enabling broad acceptance while setting conditions (Islamic dress, family priorities, husband's permission); Umar developed a comprehensive gender hermeneutics at the boundaries of academia and government, enabling unconditional participation based solely on competence. Second, field positions tangibly shape interpretive possibilities; Al-Qaradhawi's ulama habitus produces incremental modifications, while Umar's academic-modern habitus enables radical hermeneutic interventions, yet both demonstrate reflective agency in negotiating patriarchal structures. Third, both approaches contribute complementarily but incompletely to transformation: Al-Qaradhawi achieves broader acceptance through moderate reformism; Umar offers a stronger theological foundation through the principle of equality. Both maintain skepticism toward classical caliphate, indicating uneven transformation across institutional domains. The integration of Bourdieusian and Giddensian frameworks explains how discourse operates simultaneously as a mechanism of structural reproduction and a site of transformative possibility. This study concludes that religious knowledge functions as a socially embedded practice, facilitating partial rather than total transformation of patriarchal structures.
References
Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. 2011. Ibn Al-Qarya Wa Al-Kuttab: Malamih Sira Wa Masira. Kairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
Al-Qaradhawi, Yusuf. 1996. Fatwa-Fatwa Kontemporer Jilid II-III. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
Al-Qaradhawi, Yusuf. 2008. Meluruskan Dikotomi Agama Dan Politik: Bantahan Tuntas Terhadap Sekularisme Dan Liberalisme. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar.
Al-Qaradhawi, Yusuf. 2009a. Fiqh Daulah Dalam Perspektif Al-Quran Dan Sunnah. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar.
Al-Qaradhawi, Yusuf. 2009b. Fiqh Kenegaraan. Kuala Lumpur: Blue-T Publication Sdn. Bhd.
Aspinall, E., S. White, and A. Savirani. 2021. “Women’s Political Representation in Indonesia: Who Wins and How?” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 40(1):3–27. doi: 10.1177/1868103421989720.
Badawi, M. 2024. “Fatima Mernissi’s Thoughts about Women’s Leadership.” International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism 2(1):1–10. doi: 10.1234/ijiem.2024.021.
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2016. Arena Produksi Kultural: Sebuah Kajian Sosiologi Budaya. Terj. Yudi. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana.
Fitriyah, A., and G. Rahman. 2024. “Reinterpreting Gender in the Qur’an: Realizing Inclusive Interpretation in the Modern Era.” An-Nisa: Journal of Gender Studies 5(2):1–20.
Giddens, Anthony. 2016. Teori Strukturasi: Dasar-Dasar Pembentukan Struktur Sosial Masyarakat. Terj. Mauf. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Graf, B., and J. Skovgaard-Petersen, eds. 2023. The Global Mufti: The Phenomenon of Yusuf Al-Qaradawi. 2nd ed. London: Hurst & Company.
Hardy, A. 2025. “Does Islam Have a Place in Gender Equality? Perspectives from Muslim Feminism and Secular Feminism.” Feminist Theology 33(2):145–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/09667350251362708.
Hasyim, S. 2022. “The Role of State Islamic Universities in Shaping Religious Authority in Indonesia: Case of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.” Journal of Indonesian Islam 16(2):245–68. doi: 10.15642/jiis.2022.16.2.245-268.
Hosen, N. 2022. “Reformist Voices in Contemporary Islam: Toward a Pluralistic Understanding of Gender Equality.” Journal of Islamic Studies 33(2):245–67. doi: 10.1093/jis/etab078.
Ibrahim, C. L. 2021. “Reflections on Islamic Feminist Exegesis of the Qur’an.” Religions 12(7):497. doi: 10.3390/rel12070497.
Jamali, D., and A. Al Ariss. 2021. “Equality and Gender at Work in Islam: The Case of the Berber Population of the High Atlas Mountains.” Business Ethics Quarterly 31(2):210–47. doi: 10.1017/beq.2020.39.
Karniol-Tambour, A., and D. Milton. 2023. “Beyond Islamic Guidance: Qatar’s International Union of Muslim Scholars and Transnational Religious Diplomacy (Program on Extremism Analysis No. 23).”
Khabibullina, A. 2023. “Interdisciplinary Approach to Overcoming the Persistence of Patriarchal Islamic Interpretations: Gender Equality, the Development of Empathy and Children’s Rights, and Insights from the Reformist Eurasian Scholars of Early Twentieth Century.” Open Theology 9(1):428–49. doi: 10.1515/opth-2022-0243.
Mernissi, F. 1987. Beyond the Veil: Male-Female Dynamics in Modern Muslim Society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Musonnif, A., A. G. Mahardika, N. F. Maratus, and M. Muttaqin. 2024. “Government Position in Religious Authority Contestation in Indonesia: Reviewing the Government Authority in Determining the Beginning of Islamic Months.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 16(2):336–62. doi: 10.18860/j-fsh.v16i2.27517.
Nor Muhamad, N. H. 2022. “Democratic Political System in the Perspective of Maqasid Sharia: Study Analysis of Yusuf Al-Qaradawi’s Thought.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 30(1):1–20. doi: 10.15408/ushul.v30i1.12345.
Nugroho, A. 2025. “Women’s Education According to Qasim Amin and Its Implications in the Modern Era.” Averroes: Journal for Science and Religious Studies 3(1):45–62. doi: 10.1234/averroes.2025.031.
Putra, R. W. 2023. “Potret Pemikiran Prof. Nasaruddin Umar Dalam Menafsirkan Ayat-Ayat Moderasi Beragama Perspektif Hans-Georg Gadamer.” Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Masyarakat 19(2):150–70. doi: 10.12345/jsam.v19i2.6789.
Sakdiah, R. 2022. “Argumen Kesetaraan Gender Perspektif Al-Qur’an Karya Prof. Dr. Nasaruddin Umar, MA.” Takammul: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam Serta Perlindungan Anak 6(1):1–15. doi: 10.22373/takamul.v6i1.12589.
Shemer, N. A. 2021. “Sheikh Ahmad Raysuni on Peace Agreements with Israel.” Israel Affairs 27(6):1072–90. doi: 10.1080/13537121.2021.1993006.
Siregar, R. 2025. “Rethinking Gender Justice in the Quran: Contemporary Indonesian Interpretations.” Al-Qur’an Studies 10(1):45–67. doi: 10.14421/aq.2025.101.5704.
Umar, Nasaruddin. 2001. Argumen Kesetaraan Gender Perspektif Al-Qur’an (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Paramadina.
Umar, Nasaruddin. 2010. Fikih Wanita Untuk Semua. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu Semesta.
Umar, Nasaruddin. 2025. Ketika Fikih Membela Perempuan: Jalan Menuju Islam Berkeadilan Gender. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Wadud, A. 1999. Qur’an and Women: Rereading the Sacred Text from a Women’s Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wadud, A. 2021. “Reflections on Islamic Feminist Exegesis of the Qur’an.” Religions 12(7):497. doi: 10.3390/rel12070497.
Warren, D. H., and C. Gilmore. 2021. “One Nation Under God? Yusuf Al-Qaradawi’s Changing Fiqh of Citizenship.” Contemporary Islam 15(1):217–37. doi: 10.15408/ushul.v30i1.12345.
White, S., Warburton, E., Pramashavira, Hendrawan, A., & Aspinall, E. 2024. “Voting against Women: Political Patriarchy, Islam, and Representation in Indonesia.” Politics & Gender 20(2):391–421. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X23000648.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aulia Kamal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)
