VIOLATION OF COOPERATION PRINCIPLES IN DRAMA AHLUL KAHFI THE WORK OF TAUFIQ AL-HAKIM, ANALYSIS OF GRICE IMPLICATURES

; This study aims to describe the forms of violation of the principles of cooperation in the first part of the Ahlul Kahfi drama. And knowing the conditional meaning of implicature in the first part of the ahlul kahfi drama. To achieve this goal, descriptive qualitative research is used by analyzing and collecting the script of the play in the form of conversations between characters using the theory of violation of the principle of Grice's cooperation which gave birth to the conversational implicature. This method can provide a conclusion that in the script of the first part of the Ahlul Kahfi drama there are several violations against the principles of cooperation namely the violation of quality maxims, violations of quantity maxims and violations of relationship maxims, and there is no violation of the maxim of means. And the meaning born of the implicature of the conversation due to the violation of the principle is adapted to the context of the speech.


A. Introduction
Language is an arbitrary sound sign system that speech communities use to collaborate, communicate, and have spoken interactions with one another. 1 The study of language is constantly evolving since communication and interaction are two of language's primary functions. Pragmatics is one of the relatively newer areas of linguistics that studies how context affects interaction and communication. 2 A subfield of linguistics known as pragmatics studies the significance of speech contexts between speakers and listeners. According to Leech, Levinson, and Yule, pragmatics is the study of language that focuses on the study of language related to its users (speakers), and pragmatics cannot be divorced from the study of language used by people in real life, for specific purposes, and in the actual world. 3 The Cooperative Principle, developed by Grice, is a theory that informs the science of pragmatics when people interact or speak using language. However, in the science of pragmatics, there is a language issue that arises during conversations when one of the parties flouts the Cooperative Principle. This conversational event is known as a Conversional Implicate or Conversational Implicate, and these even occur when people are speaking informally, and these occurrences give rise to fresh intentions or meanings that do not correspond to the lexical meaning but do contain indirect purposes or meanings. According to Leech, an implicature occurs when one of the cooperative principles is broken in a conversation. Grice's cooperative principle is made up of the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance, and manner (action maxim). 4 If any one of these maxims is broken, the conversation is deemed to have occurred in violation. 5 In principle, implicature, according to Levinson, consists of four concepts: (1) providing a meaningful functional explanation for linguistic facts that cannot be 1 Abdul Chaer, Tata Bahasa Indonesia Praktis (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2011), 1. 2 FX Nadar, Pragmatik & Penelitian Pragmatik (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2009) When the cooperative principle is violated, which is done so in violation of the cooperative principle's regulations or conversational maxims, there is conversational implicature. Grice provided the following formula to explain: 9 4. Maxim of Manner, or, how one expresses oneself rather than what one says.
Grice offers this super maxim as a general principle: "You have to be transparent." The primary guidelines are further divided into 4 specific guidelines: a. Steer clear of ambiguous or vague language.
c. You should keep it short (avoid unnecessary superfluous words).
d. You must regularly communicate.

Taufiq al-Hakim's Ahlul Kahfi (Cave Dwellers) is based on the tale "Ashabul
Kahfi" that can be found in Q.S. Alkahfi 9-26. The story in the Al-Qur'an differs from Taufiq's work, but the two cannot be distinguished because the concept of the ahlul kahfi drama is a reworking of the Al-Qur'anic story into a literary work of fiction.
One of Taufiq's best plays, this drama can make a significant contribution to the growth of Egyptian literature, especially drama. Three young lads who dozed off in a harmonically cave are the subject of Ahlul Kahfi's narrative. The three of them awaken fatigued from a sleep they believed lasted only a few days hundreds of years later. They are prepared to give up the things they cherish most, including their families, loves, and even their own lives, in order to avoid King Diqyanus's massacre.
They adopted a religion that the king despised, which led to this. The religious convictions of Misylinia, Marnusyi, and Yimlikha persisted to the end of their lives.
This story also describes Marnusyi's devotion to his best friend Misylinia and the friendship between the three of them, despite the fact that they are frequently embroiled in difficult disputes. 10 This study will concentrate on identifying the purpose and location of typical mistakes in character conversations in theatrical scripts in light of these problems. Cooperative Principle Grice who was violated and established the intent or meaning included by looking at the context and condition of the conversation. Conversational Implications, which will be studied in the Arabic conversation screenplay for the drama Ahlull Kahfi first half, were born because of a violation of the cooperative principles. The following can be inferred from the explanation given above: The objective of this journal article is (1)  This research is qualitative in nature. 14 Reading and note-taking strategies were employed to gather the data for this study from the theatre scripts of Ahlul Kahfi. In this study, a descriptive analytical approach was utilized to describe the facts in the data before it was evaluated. 15 By using this technique, the researcher will be able to analyze the contextual meaning or conditional meaning in relation to the conversation's expressed circumstances and describe the conversational formats that violate the principle of courteous cooperation and lead to conversational implicatures in drama scripts.

B. Discussion
According to the study's findings, which were based on Grice's cooperative principle theory, various maxims are violated. This can be seen in the following exchanges between characters in the drama Ahlul Kahfi:

Violation of the Maxim of Quality
The maxim of quality is broken when there are doubts between the speaker and speech partner and when the source of the truth is unclear, as in the following conversation from the play: (1) They could only question close coworkers because they were both confused about how long they had been sleeping. (2) They believed that they had simply temporarily dozed off in a cave, and in the drama Ahlul Kahf, there is only one conversational expression that deviates from this standard of quality.

Violation of the Maxim of Quantity
When an utterance is made that is either more or less than what the speaker or the listener needs, as in the theater conversation below, the maxim of quantity is violated. Because Yimlikha provided more information than Marnusyi requested, he or she violated the cooperative principle of the maxim of quantity in this conversation.
As a result, an implicature meaning-that is, a meaning that is consistent with the context in which the utterance was made-was formed, and this meaning was when Yimlikha was asked where to go. Since they were hiding at the time and could only out if it was really necessary, he began by stating that he was hungry. This allowed Yimlikha to go out and purchase food because hunger was one of the most pressing needs. This conversation breaks the rule of quality because Yimlikha gives Marnusyi more information than is necessary. As a result of this violation, an implicature meaning-an implied meaning that is consistent with the circumstances or context of speech-is created. The implicature meaning in this conversation suggests that sleeping for more than a year makes sense in light of the accounts of miracles (miracles) performed by God. The conversation was an implicature due to a violation of the cooperation principle, and the meaning of the implicature in the conversation was that Misylinia could no longer stand being in the cave so he could not wait another few days to get out. This conversation violated the relationship maxim because the question was answered with a question, so the conversation between the two was not connected, but still had meaning according to the context of the speech.

Misylinia
: I? When did I not believe you?
Marnusyi : Love devours everything, even friendship and even faith.
Marnusyi did not respond when Misylinia expressed doubt in him, instead responding merely with, "Love swallows everything, even friendship and even faith," which went against the relationship maxim. Even if he still has faith in Marnusyi, he