Artikel

Default Cover for ICONICITY IN THE BINOMIALS OF THE GLORIOUS QURAN: AL-BAQARAH SURA AS A CASE STUDY
Volume 23, Issue 2 (2023)
ICONICITY IN THE BINOMIALS OF THE GLORIOUS QURAN: AL-BAQARAH SURA AS A CASE STUDY
Affiliation Details
  • Ali Hussein Hazem: Department of English, College of Education, University of Al-Hamdaniya, Iraq. Department of Philology, University of Patras, Greece.
  • Zahraa Muharam Salman: Department of English, College of Education, University of Al-Hamdaniya, Iraq.
  • Muhammad Hamza Kanaan: Department of English, College of Education, University of Al-Hamdaniya, Iraq.
, Pages: 404-426 , DOI: 10.22373/jiif.v23i2.18949

Abstract

This study investigates evidence for the existence of iconicity as a processing strategy in Quranic discourse. It is argued here that the Muslim’s most glorious book, the Quran, is an excellent source of morphosyntactic iconicity in the Arabic language. The hypothesis was tested by analysing sixty-six binomials from Al-Baqarah Sura within a synthetic model based on an extension of Givón’s 1984 model of iconicity. The findings show that some of the sampled iconic binomials accord with these principles, while others are iconic with regard to the human perceptual system. This result challenges Saussurian arbitrariness and lends support for the view that some aspects of language are iconic. Furthermore, iconic binomials are richly manifested in Quranic lexicon and discourse. This is because they are part of the rhetoric of Quran. Allah has created everything in pairs: night and day, death and life, sun and moon, paradise and hell, etc. These pairs express such  rhetorical functions as revealing situation, warning, promising, inhibition, specification, etc. They also express Allah’s intention in motivating people to make a balance between benefits and problems of each pair. The role played by iconic binomials can be easily tested by removing some of them from the suras of Quran and asking what happens then. On such cases, the Quranic rhetoric is distorted rather than unites. Above all, such binomials are cross linguistics, they are universal since they are found in all languages. This conclusions challenges Sapir-Worf hypothesis and lends support to an assumption of a minimal universality of linguistic interactions.

2

TOTAL VIEWS

0

DOWNLOADS

ALTMETRICS

References

The Holy Quran.

Abbas, Fadhil. Hasan. Al- Balaaɣah: Funwnuwnuha wa Afnaaanuhaa [Rhetoric and its arts]. Amman: Dar Al-Furqan. (1987).

Al-Hashimi, A. Jawahir Al-Balaaɣah fi l-Maʕaany wa l-bayaan wa Al-Badiiʕ [ germs of rhetoric in meanings, statement and Budaiya]. (1994). Beyrut: Dar al-Fikr

Al-Otaibi, Ghuzayyil. "Religious binomials in Hebrew and Arabic: A review of literature." International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation 4, no. 3 (2021): 209-215. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.3.24

Anderson, Earl R. A grammar of iconism. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press, 1998.

Bybee, JL. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Vol. 9). John Benjamins Publishing. (1985).

Cooper, William E., John Robert Ross, Robin E. Grossman, L. James San, and Timothy J. Vance. "Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism." Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1975.

Croft, William. ‘Typology,‘ in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. L. Nadel (London: Nature Publishing Group), 434–440. (2003).

Duke, James T. "Word pairs and distinctive combinations in the Book of Mormon." Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 12, no. 2 (2003): 5.

Evans, Vyvyan , & Green, M. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. (2006).

Fischer, Olga, and Max Nänny, eds. The motivated sign: Iconicity in language and literature 2. Vol. 2. John Benjamins Publishing, 2001.Matthews, Peter H. Morphology. Cambridge university press, 1991.

Givón, Talmy. Syntax: A Functional Typological Introduction. Volume II. John Benjamins. (1984).

Gorgis, Dinha T., and Yaser Al-Tamimi. "Binomials in Iraqi and Jordanian Arabic." Journal of Language and Linguistics 4, no. 2 (2005): 135-151.

Grice, Herbert P. "Logic and conversation." In Speech acts, pp. 41-58. Brill, 1975.

Haiman, John. "The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation." Language (1980): 515-540.

Haiman, John, ed. Iconicity in syntax: proceedings of a Symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24-6, 1983. Vol. 6. John Benjamins Publishing, 1985.

Haiman, John. "In defence of iconicity." (2008): 35-48.

Jakobson, Roman. "Quest for the essence of language." Diogenes 13, no. 51 (1965): 21-37.

Jasim, Basim Yehya. "Investigating the advanced Iraqi EFL learners’ mastery of using English irreversible binomials." Adab Al-Rafidayn 53 (2009): 1-30.

Kanaan, Muhammad Hamza. (Forthcoming). Towards a theory of preference: An Examination of Binomials and Linguistics: Relativity Principle. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities.

Levelt, Willem JM, Ardi Roelofs, and Antje S. Meyer. "A theory of lexical access in speech production." Behavioral and brain sciences 22, no. 1 (1994): 1-75.

Li, Tinghua. "Application of Iconicity to English Teaching." Higher Education Studies 10, no. 2 (2020): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n2p13

Mahdi, A. "Binomial Expressions with Reference to Du’aa as-Sabaḥ (The Morning Invocation) by Imam Ali bin Abi Ṭalib (AS)." Journal of University of Babylon 24, no. 1 (2016): 188-197.

Marcus, Solomon, and Andreea Calude. "Syntactic iconicity, within and beyond its accepted principles." (2010).

Muhsin Khan, M., & Taqi-ud-Din Al-Hilali, M. The Interpretation of the Meaning of The Noble Qur’an in The English Language. Riyadh: Darussalam Publications. (2001).

Nöth, Winfried. "Semiotic foundations of iconicity in language and literature." The motivated sign: Iconicity in language and literature 2 (2001): 17-28.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. "Iconicity and generative grammar." Language (1992): 756-796.

Panther, K. U., & Thornburg, L. (2018). What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy. Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues, 121-160.

Peirce, Charles Sanders. Collected papers of charles sanders peirce. Vol. 1. Harvard University Press, 1974.

Reeve, C. D. C. "Aristotle, De Anima: Translation, Introduction, and Notes." (2017).

Saussure, Ferdinand de. "DE (1974) Course in General Linguistics." London, Fontana (1916).

Shen, J. X. The study of Iconicity in Syntax. Foreign Language teaching Research, 1 (2). 8–80. (1993).

Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Vol. 142. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.

Lafta, Maha, and Abbas HJ Sultan. "IMAGIC ICONICITY IN SAAD SURAH: A MORPHOPHONEMIC STUDY." Journals Eduction for Girls 1, no. 27 (2020).

Watson, Janet CE. The phonology and morphology of Arabic. OUP Oxford, 2007.