PENGHAPUSAN PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMULIHAN HAK-HAK KONSTITUTIONAL

Muhammad Siddiq Armia

Abstract


The removal of the presidential threshold system, on the one hand, has made a positive impact on the development of democracy in Indonesia. It can restore the basic rights of the citizens in the constitution (remedy of constitutional rights) that had been hurt by the threshold. The advantages include the minor parties’ opportunity to propose their respective presidential candidates and also the prospect of having more diversed presidential candidates. The new system will allow the president to be at ease in carrying out the governmental duties due to the absence of the dominant parties’ intervention in the parliament. However, the weaknesses of the abolition of the presidential threshold should also be of concern because of the vulnerability of individual interests that may be obtained through the presidential nomination. In terms of the national security, there will be an expansion of conflict and criminal acts escalation attributed to the candidates' election. Further, for the efficiency itself, the electoral budget allocation will greatly increase (high cost election). This will nevertheless an issue because such excessive budget allocation may be better supplied to areas that can increase the people’s welfare. Therefore, this assumption needs to be investigated further with in-depth research on the efficiency of campaign funds.

Keywords


presidential threshold, remedy of constitutional rights, high cost election

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexy, Robert, 2002, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arrsa, Ria Casmi, 2014, "Pemilu Serentak Dan Masa Depan Konsolidasi Demokrasi," Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 11, Nomor 3.

Coady, David, 2015, The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies Revisited, New York: International Monetary Fund.

Dahl, Robert A., 1989, Democracy and Its Critics, New Heaven: Yale University Press.

Evelina, Wati, Lidya, dan Mia Angeline, 2015, "Upaya Mengatasi Golput Pada Pemilu 2014," Jurnal Humaniora, Volume 6, Nomor 1.

Kalla, Jusuf, 2016, ‘Anggaran Pemilu Keterlaluan,’ http://www.anggaran.depkeu.go.id/web-content-list.asp?ContentId=274, diunduh 18 Maret.

Putusan MK No 14/PUU-XI/2013.

RF, Tusalem, 2015, “Ethnic Minority Governments, Democracy, and Human Rights,†Politics & Policy, Volume 43, Nomor 4, Agustus.

Riyanto, Ahmad, 2015, "Implementasi Pilihan Legislatif Dan Pilihan Presiden Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Perspektif Maá¹£lahah (Perbandingan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008)," Disertasi Doktoral Universitas Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta.

Ruppert, Evelyn, and Mike Savage, 2011, "Transactional Politics." The Sociological Review, Volume 59, Nomor 2.

Streb, Matthew Justin, 2013, Law and Election Politics: The Rules of the Game, New York: Routledge.

Sukarno, Bedjo, 2012, "Pendidikan Politik dalam Demokratisasi," Widya Wacana, Volume 7, Nomor 1.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden.

Wells, Michael Lewis, 2015, "Constitutional Remedies: Reconciling Official Immunity with the Vindication of Rights," Saint John's Law Review.

Wilson, Chris, 2015, "Illiberal Democracy And Violent Conflict In Contemporary Indonesia," Democratization, Volume 22, Nomor 7.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/petita.v1i2.1303

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter 

INDEXED BY: