Identifying ‘Illat through Munasabah in Islamic Law: A Perspective of Imam Al-Ghazali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10914Keywords:
‘Illat, Munasabah, Ushul FiqhAbstract
This study discusses the way in determining ‘illat through the munasabah method proposed by Imam al-Ghazali in the perspective of Islamic law. The study focuses on two main problems: the identification of ‘illat through munasabah and the legal formulation to utilize hikmat to obtain ‘illat according to al-Ghazali. This normative legal research used a legal history approach as an analytical tool to examine the Islamic scholars’ thoughts on concepts, theories and ways of doing istinbath. The study concluded that according to al-Ghazali there are three kinds of munasabah in determining ‘illat, consisting of munasib mu’atstsir, munasab mula’im, and munasib gharib. In munasib mu’atstsir, there is no issue found in seeking ‘illat because the ‘illat is understood directly from the nash or ijma’. Therefore, munasabah is no longer needed in the determining ‘illat. Here, the munasabah method focuses on munasib mula’im and munasib gharib in identifying ‘illat. Munasib mula’im seeks for the genus ‘illat, an ‘illat drawn from every event that has been predetermined by the nash, by examining the same hikmah in each of the events. Such hikmah is then used as the genus ‘illat which will later be applied as qiyas for other events that have been legally stipulated by the nash. On the other hand, munasib gharib seeks for the species ‘illat, an ‘illat obtained from an event that has been predetermined by the nash, with no comparison found in other events. ‘Illat determined from munasib gharib is also hikmah, having no concrete nature. In the perspective of legal history, this method of seeking ‘illat is inseparable from kalam and philosophy as was the development of the Islamic sciences at the time. As such, this had also affected al-Ghazali’s mastery in Islamic law as well as in other Islamic disciplines.
References
Abubakar, Al Yasa’, Ahli Waris Sepertalian Darah: Kajian Perbandingan Terhadap Penalaran Hazairin dan Penalaran Fikih Mazhab, Jakarta, INIS, 1998.
Abubakar, Al Yasa’, Ke Arah Ushul Fiqih Kontemporer; Sistematika Alternatif Untuk Penalaran, Media Kajian Keislaman, No. 68, 1990.
Akbar, Asep Opik, Kontruksi Epistemologis Penalaran Hukum Imam Syafi’i, Jurnal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 14, No. 2 (2014).
Al-Baidlawi, Minhaj al-Ushul fi ‘Ilm al-Ushul, Syarh al-Bakhasyi wa ma’al Syarh al-Isnawi, Mesir: Muhammad ‘Ali Shabhi wa Auladih, Juz III, n.d.
Al-Dawalibi, al-Madkhal ila ‘Ilm Ushul al-Fiqh, Beirut, Dar al-Kitab al-Jadid, 5th Ed., 1965.
Al-Dzahabi, Abu Abdillah Syamsuddin, Siyaru A’lami al-Nubala, Beirut: al-Risalah, 1996.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad, al-Mustashfa min ‘Ilm al-Ushul, n.p., Dar al-Fikr, n.d.
Al-Sarakhsi, Muhammad Abu Bakar, Ushul al-Sarakhsi, Cairo: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi, 1372 H.
Al-Sha’adi, ‘Abd al-Hakim ‘Abd al-Rahman As’ad, Mabahis al-‘Illah fi al-Qiyas ‘ind al-Ushuliyin, Beirut, Dar al-Basyair al-Islamiyah, 1st Ed., 1986.
Al-Syaukani, Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Muhammad, Irsyadu al-Fuhul ila Tahqiq al-Haqq min `Ilm al-Ushul, Dar al-Fikr, Beirut, n.d.
Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah, Ushul al-Fiqh al-Islami, Jld. I, Beirut, Dar al-Fikr al-Ma’ashir, 1986.
Anwar, Syamsul, Teori Konformitas dalam Metode Penemuan Hukum Islam al-Ghazzali, in M. Amin Abdullah, Antologi Studi Islam, Teori dan Metodologi, Yogyakarta: Sunan Kalijaga Press, 2002.
Azra, Azyumardi, Jaringan Ulama Timur Tengah dan Kepualuan Nusantara Abad XVII dan XVIII, Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.
Azwar, Zainal, Pemikiran Ushul Fikih al-Ghazali tentang a-Maslahat al-Mursalah (Studi Eksprolasi terhadap Kitab al-Mustahfa min ‘Ilmi al-Ushul Karya al-Ghazali), Jurnal Fitrah 1, No. 1 (2015).
Bahar, Muchlis, Metode Penemuan Alasan Rasional dalam Hukum Islam (Masalik al-‘illat), Jurnal Fitrah 1, No. 1 (2015).
Basri, Cik Hasan Model Penelitian Fiqh, Jilid I, Bogor: Kencana, 2003.
Djawas, Mursyid, Amrullah, and Fawwas bin Adenan, Fasak Nikah dalam Teori Maslahah Imam al-Ghazali, Jurnal El-Usrah 2, No. 1 (2019).
Fannani, Muhyar, Ilmu Ushul Fiqh di Mata Filsafat Ilmu, Semarang: Wali Songo Press, 2009.
Hadi, Solikhul, Analisis Kitab al-Mustashfa Karya al-Ghazali, Jurnal Yudisia 9, No. 1 (2018).
Halimang, St. Pendekatan ‘Illat Hukum Dalam Penalaran Fikih, Jurnal Al-‘Adl 7, No. 1, (2014).
Hasballah, Ali, Ushul al-Tasyri’ al-Islami, Dar al-Ma’arif, Egypt, 1970.
Hazm, Ibnu, al-Muhalla, Cairo: Dar al-Fikir, n.d.
Khallaf, ‘Abd al-Wahâb, ‘Ilm Ushul al-Fiqh, n.p., Dar al-Qalam, 1987.
M. Nashirudin, Ta’lil al-Ahkam dan Pembaruan Ushul Fikih, Jurnal Ahkam 15, No. 1 (2015).
M. Zaki, Formulasi Standar Masalah dalam Hukum Islam (Studi atas Pemikiran al-Ghazali dalam Kitab al-Mustashfa), Jurnal al-Risalah 13, No. 1 (2013).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014. Ali, Zainuddin, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Milenia, Ranti (et.al.), Analisis Hikmah dan ‘Illat Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Islam, At-Tawasuth (Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam) 2, No. 1 (2020).
Romli, Illat dan Pengembangan Hukum Islam, Jurnal Intizar 20, No. 2 (2014).
Sabri, Fakhruddin Ali, Penetapan ‘Illat al-Hukum Melalui al-Manath dalam Qiyas, Jurnal Al-Ihkam 10, No. 1 (2015).
Shihab, Alwi, Islam Sufistik: Islam Pertama dan Pengaruhnya Hingga Kini di Indonesia, Bandung: Mizan, 2001.
Sulayman, Abdul Wahab Abu, Manhajiyyah al-Imam Muhammad ibn Idris al-Syafi’i di al-Fiqh wa Ushullih, Lubnan: Dar Ibn Hazm, 1991.
Wahidah, Zumratul. Metodologi Hukum Islam Perspektif al-Ghazali, Jurnal Media Keadilan 11, No. 2 (2020).
Yahya, Mukhtar dan Fatchurrahman, Dasar-Dasar Pembinaan Hukum Fiqh Islami, Bandung: Alma’arif, 1986.
Zahrah, Muhammad Abu, Ushul al-Fiqh, t.tp: Dar al-Fikr al-‘Arabi, n.d.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)