The Confiscation of Husbands’ Wealth as A Collateral for Post-Divorce Child Support: Perspective of Maqāṣid Al-Sharī'ah
Abstract
A husband is obliged to take care of his family, including his wife and children. when they divorce, he doesn’t have to support his wife anymore, but he still has to support their children. With the compilation of Islamic Law, statute no 1 of 1974 and circular letter of Supreme Court, Courts decide how much the father needs to pay for child support after a divorce through judge’s consideration. But sometime, fathers don’t follow this decision. In Indonesia, a 2021 circular letter from the Supreme Court allows the court to take the husband's property to ensure the children get the support they need after the divorce. This research aims to determine the concept of confiscation of husband's property as a guarantee for child support after divorce from a maqāṣid al-sharī'ah perspective. The method used in this research is a normative juridical method which is descriptive. Data was collected through in-depth interviews and religious court studies. The research results show that the concept of including the ex-husband's assets as collateral for post-divorce child support is included in the execution submitted to the Religious Court for the father's husband's negligence in implementing the provisions regarding child consent in the divorce decision. This process can be submitted by the ex-wife or child's mother or child's guardian to the Religious Court. The concept of confiscating the husband's property as a guarantee for children's support after divorce can provide benefits for children in the form of hifdz nafs (protecting themselves) and hifdz aql(protecting reason), as well as benefits for fathers in the form of hifdz nafs (protecting offspring) and hifdz maal(protecting assets).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals and Books
Al-Hatab, Muhammad ibn Abdurrahman. Mawahib Al-Jalil Fi Syarh Al-Mukhtasor Al- Jalil. Beirut: Dar al fikr, 1992.
Al-Syathibi, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim Ibn Musa. Al-Muwafaqat Fi Ushul Al-Syari’ah. Beirut: Dar Al-kutub Al-ilmiyah, 2004.
Al-Syatibi, Abu Ishak. Al-Muwafaqat Fi Ushul Al-Syari’ah. Mesir: Dar Al-Fikri Al-Arabi, 1958.
Amelia, Nur. “Persepsi Hakim Pengadilan Agama Marabahan Tentang Jaminan Harta Ayah Terhadap Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian.” Banjarmasin: Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari, 2020.
Al-Syafi’i, Muhammad Ibn Idris, Al-Umm. Beirut: Jami’ Khuquq Al-Tabi’, 2001.
Auda, Jasser. Membumikan Hukum Islam Melalui Maqasid Syariah. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka, 2015.
Basith, Abdul. “Rekonstruksi Hukum Kewajiban Suami Memberikan Nafkah Iddah Pada Pasal 149 Huruf b Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Kompilasi Hukum Islam Perspektif Maqashid Al-Syari’ah”.” Tesis, IAIN Palangka Raya, 2019.
Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504.
Denscombe, Martyn. “Communities of Practice: A Research Paradigm for the Mixed Methods Approach.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2, no. 3 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808316807.
Dimyati, Khudzaifah, et.al., “Indonesia as a Legal Welfare State: A Prophetic-Transcendental Basis.” Heliyon 7, no. 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865.
Dimyati, Khudzaifah, and Kelik Wardiono. “Metode Penelitian Hukum.” Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2004.
Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Buku II Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Dan Administrasi Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2014.
Djazuli, H. A. Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2019.
Draper, H. “Paternity Fraud and Compensation for Misattributed Paternity.” Journal of Medical Ethics 33, no. 8 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.013268.
Elviandari, Elviandari, et.al., “The Formulation of Welfare State: The Perspective of Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 8, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v8i1.117-146.
Fajar, Mukti, and Ahmad Yulianto. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
Greene, Jennifer C. “Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology?” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2, no. 1 (January 1, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969.
Harlina, Yuni, and Siti Asiyah. “Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru Tentang Hadhanah Pasca Perceraian Menurut Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal An-Nahl 7, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.54576/annahl.v7i2.17.
Huzaimah, Arne. “Reformulasi Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama Dalam Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan “Hadhanah.” Jurnal Nurani 18, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v18i2.1942.
Ibn Majah Al Quzwaini, Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Yazid ibn Abdullah. Sunan Ibn Majah. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 2004.
Ibrahim, Duski. Al-Qawa’id Al-Maqashidiyah (Kaidah-Kaidah Maqashid). Ar-Ruzz Media, Jogjakarta. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2019.
Ishaq, Ishaq. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Serta Disertasi.” Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
Ja’far, A. Kumedi, and Agus Hermanto. “Reinterpretation of the Rights and Duties of Contemporary Husbands and Wives.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.9124.
Jazuli, H A. Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih: Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Masalah Yang Praktis. Jakarta: Kencana, 2006.
Mardi, Oxys, and Fatmariza Fatmariza. “Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Keterabaian Hak-Hak Anak Pascaperceraian.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 6, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v6i1.3282.
Masrukhin, M, and Meliana Damayanti. “Hukum Progresif Penanganan Hak Nafkah Anak Dalam Kasus Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Karesidenan Surakarta).” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v5i1.1794.
Mohamad, Abdul Basir, et.al., “Children’s Protection in the Issue of Hadhanah Based on Islamic Family Law and the Law of Thailand.” Asian Social Science 12, no. 10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n10p18.
Nasution, Khoiruddin and Syamruddin Nasution, “Implementation of Indonesian Islamic Family Law to Guarantee Children’s Rights,” al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies 59, No. 2 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.347-374
Puspytasari, Heppy Hyma, and Firman Firman. “Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Pembayaran Nafkah Anak Sebagai Akibat Perceraian.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 5, no. 2 (2021).
Ramdani, Riyan, and Firda Nisa Syafitri. “Penentuan Besaran Nafkah Madhiyah, Nafkah Iddah Dan Mut’ah Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama.” Adliya: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan 15, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v15i1.11874.
Rasyid, Arbanur, et.al., “Dynamics of Childless Marriage Through the Lens of Maqasid Al-Shari’a,” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 12, No. 2 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i2.1182
Sarwat, Ahmad. Maqashid Syariah. Jakarta: Rumah Fiqih Publishing, 2019.
Shidiq, Ghofar. “Teori Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Dalam Hukum Islam.” Majalah Ilmiah Sultan Agung 44, no. 118 (2009).
Sinaga, Istiqomah. “Pemenuhan Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Di Indonesia, Malaysia Dan Australia,” 2020.
Soemiyati, Soemiyati. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2004.
Sugitanata, Arif. “Product Renewal in the Field of Family Law in Indonesia.” Law and Justice 6, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v6i1.10699.
Suranto, Suranto, et.al., “قاعدة" اقتضاء النهي الفساد و البطلان " عند المذاهب الأربعة " و تطبيقاتها في المناكحات.” Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam 21, no. 1 (July 2020). https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v21i1.11656.
Susanto, Anton F. Penelitian Hukum Transformatif-Partisipatoris: Fundasi Penelitian Kolaboratif Dan Aplikasi Campuran (Mix Method) Dalam Penelitian Hukum, Malang: Setara Press, 2015.
Tabrani, Mukti. “Maqâshid Revitalization in Global Era: Istidlâl Study from Text to Context.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 13, no. 2 (D2018). https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v13i2.1814.
Tarmizi, M. Jakfar, and Nur Azizah Fayyadhah Binti Baharuddin. “Peran Majelis Sulh dalam Penyelesaian Hak Hadhanah Pasca Perceraian (Studi Kasus Di Mahkamah Syariah Kabupaten Tawau, Provinsi Sabah, Negara Malaysia).” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 2, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v2i1.3112.
Zia Thahira and Dwini Handayani, “The Impact of Mother’s Gender Preference on Children’s Cognitive Ability in Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 11, No. 3 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i3.1008
Tiara, Fahmi, et.al., “Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Isteri Dan Anak Pasca Perceraian.” MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review 1, no. 2 (2022).
Tim, B I P. KUHPer (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata). Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2017.
Tohari, Chamim. “Pembaharuan Konsep Maqāsid Al-Sharī’ah Dalam Pemikiran Muhamamad Ṭahir Ibn ‘Ashur.” Al-Maslahah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 13, no. 1 (2017): 1. https://doi.org/10.24260/almaslahah.v13i1.915.
Wahyudi, Epri. “Sebuah Gagasan Dalam Perkara Nafkah Anak Dan Pelaksanaan Eksekusinya Di Pengadilan Agama.” Artikel Pengadilan Agama Kuala Kapuas, 2021.
Yuniar, Meli Dwi and Waluyo Sudarmaji, “The Realization of the Fulfilment of the Children’s Sustenance Post-Divorce in Purworejo Religious Court in 2020-2021,” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 6, No. 1 (2023). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i1.18244.
Zuhdi, Syaifuddin, et.al., “Divorce In Kangean Islands: The Study on Judge’s Legal Reasoning of Kangean Religious Court, 2020-2022.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 12, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1229.
Laws and Rules
Instruksi Presiden RI Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung, Nomor 5 Tahun 2021.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Berkaitan Dengan Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dengan Pengertian Dalam Pembahasannya. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2011.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Maros Nomor 3179/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Mrs.” Maros: Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung, 2022.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sukoharjo Nomor 1400/Pdt.G/2022.PA.Skh.” Sukoharjo: Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung, 2022.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tuban Nomor 2268/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Tbn.” Tuban: Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung, 2021.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tuban Nomor 2306/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Tbn.” Tuban: Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung, 2021.
Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Interviews
Intervew with Rukijah Madjid, Religious Court Judge, 2022.
Interview with Ahmad Sholihul Huda Ali Sidratul Muntaha, Religious Court Judge 2023.
Interview with Muntasir, Religious Court Judge, 2022.
Interview with Nanda Trisna Putra, Religious Court Judge, 2023.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.17326
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Syaifuddin Zuhdi, Khudzaifah Dimyati, Kelik Wardiono, Rahma Shofia, Abdul Hakim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam has been indexed by:
