Law Omission in Muslim Society: Inquiring Citizen Rights in the Administration of Islamic Family Law in Madura Indonesia

Abdul Haq Syawqi, Muhammad Khatibul Umam, Achmad Ainur Ridho, Roziana Amalia Ilyas, Try Subakti

Abstract


Understanding on the law omission seems controversial; some view it only as an interruption of normal life, and some discern it as an administrative violation. Differences in the understanding may produce difficulties in enforcing the administration of Islamic family law. In line with this context, while mapping forms of the law omission in various community groups, this study analyses reasons for differences of the understanding of it. This study was based on data collected from interviews, FGDs and Google Forms on three different community groups with religious structural characteristics in 4 regencies on Madura Island. This study revealed that social differences and social classes in a society have become a force that structures the society’ views or understanding of the law omission. Differences of the understanding have consequences for the levels of difficulties in enforcing the Islamic family law, especially in the administrative context, such as in cases of registration and dispensation of marriages. Structural differences that exist in a religious society become important to differentiate factors in an interpretation of a reality of life. This paper suggests to expand the observed cases and to provide additional data sources to enable an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of the impact of the law omission in the field of administration of Islamic family law.


Keywords


Law Omission, Citizen Rights, Administration, Islamic Family Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals and Books

Abubakar, Fatum, “Islamic Family Law Reform: Early Marriage and Criminalization (A Comparative Study of Legal Law in Indonesia and Pakistan).” Al Ahkam 4, no. 2 (2019).

Bedner, Adriaan, & Stijn van Huis. “Plurality of Marriage Law and Marriage Registration for Muslims in Indonesia: A Plea for Pragmatism.” Utrecht Law Review 6, no. 2 (2010).

Bukido, Rosdalina, and Fence M. Wantu. “Synchronize the Different Law Rules Study of Law Number 16 Year 2019 and Law Number 35 Year 2014.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 2020.

Cananea, Giacinto della, and Mauro Bussani. “The ‘Common Core’ of Administrative Laws in Europe: A Framework for Analysis.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19827817.

Chafe, Roger. “Rejecting Choices: The Problematic Origins of Researcher-Defined Paradigms within Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231165951.

Douglas, Michael, Mary Keyes, Sarah McKibbin, and Reid Mortensen. “The HCCH Judgments Convention in Australian Law.” Federal Law Review, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X19856503.

Faisal, Ahmad, et.al., “Sociological and Political Constraints of Islamic Sharia Enforcement in South Sulawesi Indonesia.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 22, no. 1 (2023).

Fehlberg, Belinda, et.al., “The Perils and Pitfalls of Formal Equality in Australian Family Law Reform.” Federal Law Review, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205x1804600302.

Hamad, Ahmed M.A., et.al., “The Judiciary in Islamic Law, Palestinian Legislation, and Guarantees of Its Independence.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Hukum Islam 5, No. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.8927.

Heo, Inhye. “The Paradox of Administrative Decentralization Reform in Young Asian Democracies: South Korea and Indonesia.” World Affairs, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820018813474.

Holzinger, Katharina, Roos Haer, Axel Bayer, Daniela M. Behr, and Clara Neupert-Wentz. “The Constitutionalization of Indigenous Group Rights, Traditional Political Institutions, and Customary Law.” Comparative Political Studies, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774347.

Indriani, Eka Dian, et.al.,“Traditions: Radical or Peace-Building,” 2019. https://doi.org/10.2991/icrpc-18.2019.3.

Kharlie, Ahmad Tholabi, Hukum Keluarga Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Katuoka, Saulius, and Ieva Navickaitė-Sakalauskienė. “Misleading Actions vs. Misleading Omissions under Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. National Approach in Context.” International Comparative Jurisprudence, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2016.07.002.

Kusmayanti, Hazar, et.al., The Settlement of Disputes Regarding Division of Joint Property After a Divorce in The Central Aceh Regency,” Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 21, No. 2 (2021). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v21i2.6599.

Mauri, Diletta, “Becoming Parents as Mending the Past»: Care-Experienced Parents and the Relationship with Their Birth Family.” Children and Youth Services Review, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106911.

Mies GRIJNS, Hoko HORII. “Child Marriage in a Village in West Java (Indonesia): Compromises between Legal Obligations and Religious Concerns.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 5, no. 1 (2018).

Miles, Matthew dan Huberman, A. Michael. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tantang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press, 2000.

Nasution, Khoiruddin, Fazlurrahman Tentang Wanita. Yogyakarta: Tazzafa dan Accademia, 2012.

Nurlaelawati, Euis, and Stijn Cornelis van Huis. “The Status of Children Born Out Wedlock and Adopted Children in Indonesia: Interaction Between Islamic, Adat, and Human Rights Norms.” Journal of Law and Religion 34, no. 3 (2019).

Pound, Roscoe An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New York: Routledge, 2017.

Rathus, Zoe. “‘The Research Says Perceptions on the Use of Social Science Research in the Family Law System.” Federal Law Review, 2018. https://doi.org/10.22145/flr.46.1.4.

Rio Satria. “Dispensasi Kawin Di Pengadilan Agama Pasca Revisi Undang-Undang Perkawinan,” 2019.

Syarifuddin, Amir, Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006.

Shahab, Kurnadi. Sosiologi Pedesaan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2017.

Steinbach, Anja. “Children’s and Parents’ Well-Being in Joint Physical Custody: A Literature Review.” Family Process, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12372.

Steiner, Kerstin. “Branding Islam: Islam, Law, and Bureaucracies in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700102.

Syaifullah. “Refleksi Sosiologi Hukum.” Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2007.

Szakolczai, Arpad, Agnes Horvath, and Attila Z. Papp. “Individualization as Depersonalization: Minority Studies and Political Anthropology.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2017.1273653.

The Rules of Law

Religious Court of Pamekasan. “Annual Reports/ Activity Implementation Reports for the Year 2018-2021 Pamekasan Religious Court Class I. B.” Pamekasan, n.d.

Religious Court of Bangkalan. “Report on the Implementation of Activities for the Year 2019-2021 The Bangkalan Religious Court.” Bangkalan, n.d.

Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (2019).

Interviews and FGD

ABDZ. “Direct Interview,” Madura, 2022.

WDH. “Direct Interview,” Madura, 2022.

SYHR. “Direct Interview.” Madura, 2022.

RSM. “Direct Interview,” Madura, 2022.

SHRR. “Direct Interview,” Madura, 2022.

MHTQ. “Direct Interview.” Madura,2022.

APSP. “Direct Interview,” Madura, 2022.

BTMM. “Direct Interview.” Madura, 2022.

AFMS. “Direct Interview,” Madura, 2022.

Focus Group Discussion, at Madura 2022.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.20048

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Abdul Haq Syawqi, Muhammad Khatibul Umam, Achmad Ainur Ridho, Roziana Amalia Ilyas, Try Subakti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam has been indexed by:

Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
P-ISSN 2549-3132
E-ISSN 2549-3167