The Protection of Animals under Malaysian and Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9.i3.26927Keywords:
Animal protection, animal abuse, Islamic law, Animals Act 1953, Animal Welfare Act 2015Abstract
The topic of animal protection within the framework of Islamic law is receiving more and more attention in contemporary society. Even though the Quran and hadiths contain explicit verses highlighting the significance of protecting animal rights and welfare in connection to environmental conservation, numerous instances of animal abuse and cruelty continue to occur at all societal levels. According to a report published by the Department of Veterinary Services (DVS), there has been a significant rise in animal abuse instances in Malaysia. From 2021 to June 2024, 7,613 abuse complaints were received, with the biggest number occurring in Selangor. Dogs are the most mistreated animals, followed by cats and other creatures. This problem is not limited to animals. The ecosystem’s equilibrium, human-environment relations, and animal welfare are all impacted by this problem. Hence, the objective of this study is to analyse how Malaysian and Islamic law treat animal protection. This study’s methodology is qualitative and focuses on gathering data from a variety of primary and secondary sources, such as the Quran, hadith, books on Islamic jurisprudence, and scholarly sources like laws, books, articles, journals, and papers about animal protection and animal abuse cases. In the meantime, descriptive and comparative methods are used to analyse data. According to this study, Islam firmly condemns animal cruelty, as evidenced by numerous Quranic verses and the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) hadith that stress the value of animal welfare. Islam also mandates that people treat animals with compassion. In the meantime, the Animals Act 1953 (Revised 2006) (Act 647) and the Animal Welfare Act 2015 (Act 772) in Malaysia rigorously guard against any cruelty or damage to animal habitats. Animal abuse and cruelty must be condemned in order to preserve natural harmony and ecosystem equilibrium. The findings of this study have consequences for society in terms of protecting animals in line with Islamic laws and expectations.
References
Journal and Books
Al-Bayjuri, Ibrahim. Hashiyat Al-Shaykh Ibrahim Al-Bayjuri ‘ala Sharh Al-‘Allamah Ibn Al-Qasim Al-Ghazzi ‘Ala Matn Al-Shaykh Abi Shuja.’ I. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1994.
Al-Jurjani, Ali bin Muhammad. Al-Ta’rifat. al-Qahirah: Dar al Kitab al-Mishri, 1991.
Al-Maliki, Abu Bakr Muhammad bin ‘Abd Allah bin Muhammad bin ‘Abd Allah bin Ahmad al-Ishbili Ibn al-‘Arabi. Ahkam Al-Qur’an. IV. al-Qahirah: Dar al Fikri, n.d.
Al-Sabuni, Muhammad. Safwah Al-Tafasir. III. Beirut: Dar al-Qalam, n.d.
Al-Sijistani, Abu Daud Sulaiman. Sunan Abu Daud. IV. Beirut: Maktabah al-‘Asriyah Saida, 1950.
Al-Syawkaniy, Muhammad ibn ‘Ali. Nayl Al-Awtar. VIII. Beirut: Dar al-Jayl, n.d.
Al-Tabari, Abu Ja‘far Muhammad bin Jarir. Tafsir Al-Thabari. XVI. al-Qahirah: Dar al-Ma‘arif, n.d.
Allah, Muhammad Fawzi Fayd. Nazariyyat Al-Daman Fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Al-‘Amm. Kuwait: Maktabah Dar al-Turath, 1983.
Anas, Imam Malik bin. Al-Muwaththa’, Tahqiq Ali Hasan Ali. Damascus: Muassasah al-Risalah Nasyirun, 2013.
Bunyamin, M. “’Adam Al-Haraj: A Rukhshah Application in the Implementation of Islamic Law in Modern Society Life.” Al-’Adalah, 2018.
Efendi, Efendi, M. Zuhri, Tarmizi Tarmizi, Ainal Hadi, and Rizki Yunanda. “Animal Protection in the Perspective of Positive Law and Islamic Law: A Study of Elephant-Human Conflict in Aceh, Indonesia.” Samarah 7, no. 1 (2023).
Hazm, Abu Muhammad ‘Ali bin Ahmad bin Sa‘d Ibn. Al-Muhalla. Translated. Texoma: Islamic Mosque, 1985.
Kasir, Abu al-Fida’ Isma’il al-Qurashi al-Dimashqi Ibnu. Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Azim. IV. Kairo: Darul-Manar, 1999.
Mahmassani, Subhi. Al-Nazariyyah Al-‘Ammah Li Al-Mujabat Wa Al-‘Uqud Fi Al-Shari‘ah Al-Islamiyyah. II. Beirut: Dar al-‘Ilm li al-Malayin, 1983.
Mawdudi, Abu al-A’la. Human Rights in Islam. II. London: The Islamic Foundation, 1967.
Montemayor, Carlos. “Jurisprudence and Animal Protection.” Animal Sentience 7, no. 32 (2023).
Morales, Guisseppi, Nallely Gutiérrez, Tamara Solorzano, and Fernanda Chipana. “Criteria for the Legal Protection of Animals in the Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence.” Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias Del Peru 34, no. 2 (2023).
Muslim. Sahih Muslim, Kitab Al-Birr Wa Al-Silah Wa Al-Adab, No. Hadis 2242, Narrated by Ibn ‘Umar. IV., 2022.
———. Sahih Muslim, Kitab Al-Salam, Chapter Istihab Qatl Al-Wazagh, No. Hadis 2238, Narrated by ‘Amir Bin Sa‘D. IV., n.d.
———. Sahih Muslim, Kitab Al-Salam, Chapter Qatl Al-Hayyat Wa Ghayriha, No. Hadis 2233, Narrated by Ibn ‘Umar. IV., n.d.
———. Sahih Muslim, Kitab Al-Sayd Wa Al-Dhaba’ih, Bab Al-Amr Bi Ihsan Al-Dhibh Wa Al-Qatl, No. Hadis 1955, Narrated by Shaddad Bin ‘Aus. III., n.d.
———. Sahih Muslim, Kitab Al-Sayd Wa Al-Dhaba’íh, Chapter Al-Nahy ‘an Sabr Al-Baha’Im, No. Hadis 1549, Narrated by Ibnu Abbas. III., n.d.
———. Sahih Muslim, Kitab Al-Sayd Wa Al-Dhaba’íh, Chapter Al-Nahy ‘an Sabr Al-Baha’Im, No. Hadis 1958, Narrated by Jabir Bin Abdullah. III., n.d.
———. Sahih Muslim, Kitab Al-Sayd Wa Al-Dhaba’íh, Chapter Al-Nahy ‘an Sabr Al-Baha’Im, No. Hadis 2116, Narrated by Jabir. III, n.d.
Rajab, Zayn al-Din Abu ‘Abd al-Rahman bin Shihab al-Din al-Dimashqi al-Hanbali Ibn. Jami‘ Al-‘Ulum Wa Al-Hukm Fi Sharh Khamsin Hadithan Min Jawami‘ Al-Kalim. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1995.
Sabiq, Al-Sayyid. Fiqh Al-Sunnah. III. Kairo: Dar al-Fath li I‘lam al-‘Arabi, 1996.
Sandriansyah, and Maratul Qiftiyah. “Trade In-Game Meat in Jagaraga Village, West Lampung from an Islamic Law Perspective.” Al-Ahkam 30, no. 2 (2020).
Stilt, Kristen A. “Constitutional Innovation and Animal Protection in Egypt.” Law and Social Inquiry 43, no. 4 (2018).
Syaikhu, Syaikhu, Ibnu Elmi A.S. Pelu, Muhammad Hafiz Badarulzaman, Reza Noor Ihsan, and Rafik Patrajaya. “Community, Family and Animal Conservation Sustainability in the Perspective of Normative Law and Maqasid Sharia.” El-USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 7, no. 2 (2024).
The New Webster’s International Encyclopaedia. Trident Press International, 1991.
Ulama 1993, Team of. Majallat Al-Ahkam Al-‘Adliyyah: The Ottoman Islamic Civil Code of 1876. Translated. Lahore: The Punjab Educational Press, 1967.
Yusuf, Muhammad, Muhammad Habibi MZ, and Dedy Sumardi. “Initiative Of Caning Punishment For Perpetrators Of Wildlife Killing In Aceh Province, Indonesia.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 25, no. 1 (2023).
Published
Versions
- 2025-12-31 (2)
- 2025-12-31 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Basir Mohamad and Nurbazla Ismail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)
