The Integration of Fiqh and Science
The Pork Element in the Medical Fatwa's of the Indonesian Ulema Council
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9.i3.31976Keywords:
Integration, Medical Fatwas, AuthorityAbstract
Although the integration of religion and science has been widely examined across disciplines, it remains relatively underexplored within the field of fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), particularly in relation to medical issues. This study therefore addresses a substantial gap in the existing literature. Here, case of integration in the fatwa's issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (Majelis Ulama Indonesia / MUI) was examined. These fatwas addressed vaccines that were considered haram (forbidden) since they contained or came into contact with pork-derived elements, except in cases of emergency. On the contrary, the East Java branch of the MUI permitted their use based on the concept of complete chemical transformation (istihālah tammah). To explore this issue, the study posed three research questions: (1) How are elements related to pork positioned within MUI fatwas? 2) How does the authority of ulama affect the positioning of pork-derived elements in MUI fatwa's? and (3) How is the integration model of fiqh and science articulated in MUI fatwa's? The first question was examined through content analysis of existing MUI fatwas, the second through analysis of interview data from Muslim intellectuals in Jakarta, East Java, West Sumatra, and Aceh, and the third through an integrated analysis of interview data and fatwa documents using the theory of authority. The findings thus indicate that the MUI adopts an integrative approach to science and fiqh in issuing fatwa's. However, the role of science tends to remain largely confirmatory and has yet to exert a more substantive influence. In this regard, the East Java MUI has taken a more ‘open’ approach, moving beyond the established mainstream of fiqh while still operating within the framework of classical ulama authority
References
Journal and Books
‘Umairah, Ahmad, and Ahmad Salamah al Qalyubi. Hasyiah Qalyubi Wa ‘Umairah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1995.
Abdullah, M. Amin. “Bangunan Baru Epistemologi Keilmuan Studi Hukum Islam Dalam Merespon Globalisasi.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 46, no. 2 (2012).
———. Islamic Studies Di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
Abu Ya’la Muhammad bin Husain. Al-‘Uddah Fī Uṣūl Al-Fiqh. II. Beirut: Bidūn Nāsyir, 1990.
Abubakar, Al Yasa’. Metode Istislahiah: Pemanfaatan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Ushul Fiqh. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing dan Pascasarjana IAIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh., 2012.
Al-Ghazali. Rawḍah Al-Ṭālibīn: Majmū’ah Al-Quṣūr Al-‘Awālī. Vol. 7. Cairo: Maktabah al-Jundī, 1964.
Al-Haitamī, Aḥmad Bin Muḥammad. Tuḥfat Al-Muḥtāj. IV. Mesir: al-Maktabah al-Tijāriyyah, 1983.
Al-Jabiri, Muhammad Abid. Agama, Negara Dan Penerapan Syari’ah. Yogyakarta: Fajar Baru Pustaka, 2001.
Al-Jawziyyah, Ibn Qayyim. , I`lām Al-Muwaqqi`in `an Rabb Al-`ālamin. III. Lebanon: Dar al-Fikr, n.d.
Al-Mawardi, Abu Hasan Ali bin Muhammad. Al-Hāwī Al-Kabīr. IV. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, n.d.
Al-Nawawi, Abu Zakariya Yahya bi Syarf. Majmu’ Syarh Al-Muhazzab. VII. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, n.d.
Al-Quthubi, Muhammad bin Ahmad al Anshari. Al-Jami Li Ahkam Al-Quran. Kairo: Dar al Kutub al-Mishriyah, 1964.
Al-Quzuwaini, Abdul Kārim bin Muhammad al-Raf’i. Al-Syarh Al-Kabīr. IV. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, n.d.
Al-Ramli, Syihab al-Din. Nihayat Al-Muhtaj Ila Syarh Al-Minhaj. VII. Mishra: Mustafa al-Bābi al-Halabi, 1967.
Al-Sabuni, Muhammad Ali. Tafsīr Ayāt Al-Aḥkām Min Al-Qur’ān. I. Kairo: Dār al-Ṣabuni, 2007.
Al-Syarbaini, Syamsuddin Muhammad al-Khathib. Mughni Al-Muhtaj Ila Ma’rifah Al-Ma’aniy Al-Fadh Al-Minhaj. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1994.
Al-Zuhailiy, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu. Juz V. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2004.
Alamudi, Muhammad Yusuf. “Prediksi Struktur Protein 3 Dimensi Dan Vaksin Peptide SARS COV-2,” 54–57, 2023.
Bagir, Zainal Abidin. “Nidhal Guessoum ’ s Reconciliation of Islam and Science.” Zygon 47, no. 2 (2012).
Caeiro, Alexandre. “Facts, Values, and Institutions: Notes on Contemporary Islamic Legal Debate.” The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 34, no. 2 (2017).
Cohen Orantes, Isaac. “The Concept of Integration.” CEPAL Review 1981, no. 15 (1981).
Daneshgar, Majid. “The Future Of Islam And Science: Philosophical Grounds.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 55, no. 4 (2020).
Feyzbakhsh, Mohsen. “Theorizing Religion And Questioning The Future Of Islam And Science.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 55, no. 4 (2020).
Guessoum, Nidhal. Islam’s Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. London: I.B. Taurus, 2011.
Hussain, Feryad, and Anke Iman Bouzenita. “Squaring the Circle: A Critique of the Islamisation of the Human Sciences Project.” JSTOR 50, no. 3/4 (2011).
Ian G. Barbour. When Science Meets Religion: Enemies, Strangers or Partners? HarperCollins, 2000.
Ibn Qudamah, Abu Muhammad ‘Abdullah bin Ahmad bin Muhammad Muwaffiq al-Din al-Jama’ili al-Dimasyqi. Al-Mughnīy. Vol. 12. Riyāḍ: Dār ‘Alīm al-Kutub, 1997.
Jamaa, La. “Fatwas of the Indonesian Council of Ulama and Its Contributions to the Development of Contemporary Islamic Law in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 8, no. 1 (July 2018): 29.
Jamaluddin, Jamilah, Ahmad Najib, Dzulkhairi MR., Ariff HO., and Nasri Ismail NM. “Integration of Islamic Input in Medical Curriculum - Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) Experience.” International Medical Journal Malaysia 13, no. 2 (2014).
Kammerhofer, Jörg. “Beyond the Res Judicata Doctrine: The Nomomechanics of ICJ Interpretation Judgments.” Leiden Journal of International Law, 2023, 1–27.
Kaptein, Nico J.G. “The Voice of the ‘Ulamǎ’: Fatwas and Religious Authority in Indonesia.” Archives de Sciences Sociales Des Religions 125, no. 1 (2004).
Khaleed M. Abou El Fadl. And God Knows the Soldiers : The Authoritative and Authoritarian in Islamic Discourses. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 2001.
Kuntowijoyo. Islam Sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi, Dan Etika Keilmuan Islam. Yogyakarta: Teraju, 2004.
Maiwada, Danjuma A. “Islamization of Knowledge: Background and Scope.” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 14, no. 2 (1999).
Muhajir, Noeng. Filsafat Ilmu: Ontologi, Epistemologi, Axiologi, First Order, Second Order, & Third Order of Logics Dan Mixing Paradigms Implementasi Methodologik. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin, 2011.
Reskiani, Anugrah, Dian Furqani Tenrilawa, Aminuddin, and Rahman Subha. “Reform Methods of Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia in Jurisprudence.” Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 21, no. 1 (2022): 39–51.
Safi, Louay. The Foundation of Knowledge: A Comparative Study in Islamic and Westsern Methods of Inquiry. Kuala l: IIIT & IIUM, 1996.
Saputra, Tedy Setiawan, Debi Septiani, Abdul Jalil, and Aldi Prima. “Merevolusi Penelitian Menuju Kearifan Profetik: Paradigma Baru Untuk Penemuan Yang Berarti.” Jimps 8, no. 3 (2023): 1708–21.
Seran, Soerjanto Poespowardojo dan Alexander. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan: Hakikat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Kritik Terhadap Visi Positivisme Logis Serta Implikasinya. Jakarta: Kompas, 2015.
Shahrur, Muhammad. Al-Kitab Wa Al-Qur’an: Qira’ah Mu`asirah. Damascus: Al-Ahaly, n.d.
Soroush, Abdolkarim. Reason, Freedom, & Democracy in Islam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Zuhaily, Wahbah al-. Al-Fiqh Al-Islam Wa Adillatuh. I. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr, 1989.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-12-31 (4)
- 2025-12-31 (3)
- 2025-12-31 (2)
- 2025-12-31 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Abubakar, Muhammad Ridwan Harahap, Muhammad Habibi, Abidin Nurdin, and Ahyar Gayo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)
