Construction of New Norms for the Implementation of Fines in Narcotics Cases in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v10.i1.33418Keywords:
Narcotics, Imprisonment, FinesAbstract
Narcotics abuse constitutes a violation of statutory regulations, particularly Article 7 of Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which restricts the use of narcotics to health services and the advancement of science and technology. Narcotics abuse may result in serious consequences not only for individuals but also for society, especially the younger generation. In Indonesia, narcotics misuse has spread across all levels of society, from lower to upper classes. Apart from causing dependency, narcotics consumption frequently leads to death. This circumstance poses a significant threat to the sustainability of society, the nation, and the state, placing Indonesia in a state of narcotics emergency. Accordingly, the Narcotics Law prescribes stringent sanctions, including the death penalty, imprisonment, and fines as additional or substitute penalties for convicted offenders. This study examines the imposition of fines as a substitute for imprisonment and explores judicial considerations in delivering such decisions. The study employs a normative legal method. Findings reveal that convicted persons tend to prefer imprisonment to paying fines, mainly because the fines imposed are excessively high and beyond their financial capacity. As a result, the potential state revenue from fines is not realized, while the state must instead bear substantial expenses to maintain prisoners during their incarceration. Therefore, a reconstruction of legal norms is necessary to achieve a more proportional and effective regulation of fines and imprisonment.
References
Journals and Books
Aleissa, Talal Yassin, Ziad Mohammad Al Wahshat, Hashim Ahmad Mohammad Balas, Saleem Abed Alrahman Saleem Asouli, and Ghaleb Moh’D Yasin Alshamayleh. “Principle of Legality in International Criminal Law.” Pakistan Journal of Criminology 15, no. 4 (2023).
AR, Suhariyono. Pembaharuan Pidana Denda Sebagai Sanksi Alternatif. Jakarta: Papas Sinar Sianti, 2012.
Badu, Lisnawaty W., and Julisa Aprilia Kaluku. “Restorative Justice in The Perspective of Customary Law: A Solution to The Settlement of Narcotics Crimes Committed by Children.” Jambura Law Review 4, no. 2 (2022).
Bahri, Syaiful. Pidana Denda Dinamikanya Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Praktik Peradilan. Yogyakarta: Total Media UNJ Press, 2016.
Bakhtiar, Bakhtiar. “Kumulasi Pidana Penjara Dan Denda Dalam Perkara Narkotika.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 21, no. 1 (2019).
Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Eviningrum, Sulistya, and Vasco Fronzoni. “The Model of Coaching Narcotics Prisoners in the Correctional Penitentiary.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 2, no. 2 (2022).
Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.
Farikhah, Mufatikhatul. “The Judicial Pardon Arrangement as a Method of Court Decision in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law Procedure.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2021).
Fauzan. “Alternatives to Criminal Conviction in a Comparative Analysis of Positive Law and Islamic Criminal Law.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2022).
Franklin, Travis W., and Noelle E. Fearn. “Sentencing Asian Offenders in State Courts.” Crime & Delinquency 61, no. 1 (2015).
Gavrilov, Boris, and Evgeniya Rogova. “Criminal Law Sanctions and the Practice of Their Implementation in Counteracting Some Crimes of Corruption.” Russian Journal of Criminology 15, no. 5 (2021).
Hartley, Richard D. “Sentencing Reforms and the War on Drugs: An Analysis of Sentence Outcomes for Narcotics Offenders Adjudicated in U.S. District Courts on the Southwest Border.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 24, no. 4 (2008).
Kusuma Haryanto, Indra, Sudarsono Sudarsono, Bambang Sugiri, and Abdul Rachmad Budiono. “Ratio Legis of Special Minimum Limit Regulation in Narcotics Law.” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) 10, no. 7 (2021).
Laksana, Andri Winjaya, Hendro Widodo, Moh Aris Siswanto, H. D. Djunaedi, and Setiawan Widyoko. “Criticism of Legal Protection for Victims of Drug Abuse: The Disharmony in Legal Substance Regulation.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 33, no. 1 (2025).
Liang, Bin, Hong Lu, and Melanie Taylor. “Female Drug Abusers, Narcotics Offenders, and Legal Punishment in China.” Journal of Criminal Justice 37, no. 2 (2009).
Marton, Lydia Harlina. Membantu Pencandu Narkotika Dan Keluarga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2006.
Maume, Michael O., and Matthew J. Greife. “Giving the Green Light: Corporate Environmental Crimes, the Treadmill of Production, and Environmental Justice.” Crime, Law and Social Change 79, no. 3 (2023).
Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.
Nawawi, Jumriani, and Farida Patittingi. “Advanced System Of Medical Rehabilitation And Criminal Sanctions For Narcotics Abuse.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24 (2021).
Nursiti, and Fakhrullah. “Disparitas Penjatuhan Pidana Kurungan Pengganti Pidana Denda Dalam Putusan Kasus Narkotika.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 2 (2015).
Pastor Muñoz, Nuria. “Why International Criminal Law Can and Should Be Conceived With Supra-Positive Law: The Non-Positivistic Nature of International Criminal Legality.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 17, no. 2 (2023).
Prihananto, Prihananto, and Anis Mashdurohatun. “Implementation of Criminal Sanctions by Public Prosecutor against Narcotics Abuse.” Law Development Journal 2, no. 3 (2020).
Priyanta, Maret, and Cut Sabina Anasya Zulkarnain. “Sustainable Infrastructure Legal Policy in Indonesia: A National Strategic Project Approach for National Development.” Sriwijaya Law Review, 2023.
Rohi, Leba Max Nandoko, and Tanudjaja Tanudjaja. “Sentencing of Juvenile Narcotics Offenders in the Sidoarjo District Court.” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 13, no. 2 (2024).
Soesilo, R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Bogor: Politea, 1996.
Sriwidodo, Joko. Perkembangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kepel Press, 2020.
Sumajow, Inry Rohany. “Assessing the Concept of Depenalization Policy in Handling Criminal Cases of Narcotics Abuse.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2024).
Terletskii, Anatoliy, Dmytro Nykyforchuk, Vitaliі Teliіchuk, Roman Kobko, and Oleksandr Tymofiiv. “International Practice for Prevention of Illegal Narcotic Drug Trafficking: Legal Basis and Directions for Improvement.” Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research 13, no. 3 (2024).
UNODC. “Report Special Session of the UN General Assembly on Drugs.” New York, 1998.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Hukum Konsep Dan Metode. Malang: Setara Press, 2013.
Zaykov, Denis. “The Institution of a Judicial Fine as a Measure of Procedural Responsibility: Issues of Determining the Subject Composition.” Journal of Russian Law 29, no. 4 (2025).
Zuniarto, Heri. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Denda Bersifat Minimum Khusus Dalam Delik Narkotika.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no. 2 (2020).
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-02-17 (2)
- 2026-02-17 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bakhtiar Bakhtiar, Mohd Din, Ilyas Yunus, and Darmawan Darmawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)
