Urgence Of Combined Claims Of Default And Branch Of Contract In Civil Procedure Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v7i1.12201Abstract
Lawsuits in civil law are divided into 2 (two) types, namely claims for breach of contract and lawsuits agains the law. In practice, many legal practitioners combine these 2 (two) basic claims in one lawsuit. This study uses a normative juridical method with the statue approach and case approach. The results of the study stated that a person is said be in default if he has fulfilled the achievements as stated in Article 1234 of Civil Code or as agreed then a person is considered to have committed an unlawful act if he fulfills the elements in 1365 of the Civil Code, and the party whose rights have been violated must prove that his rights have been violated and ask for compensation loss. Then in the doctrinal provisions, it is not permissible to mix up the claim for breach of contract as well as an act that violates the law, but if in formulating the posita it has been firmly separated between the fact of the act of default and the fact of the violating the law, then the merger is allowed. In addition, a default can at the same time lead to unlawful acts, as long as the fact is that it is afegault and the fact itself occurs outside the obligations required by the contractReferences
Adolf, Huala. Perancangan Kontrak Internasional.Bandung: CV Keni Media. 2011.
Andrews, Neil. Breach of Contract: A Plea For Clarity and Dicipline, “SSRN University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 40 2018
Ali, Moch. Menakar Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan dalam Pengajuan Gugatan Kumulasi (Samenvoeging Van Vordering) di Pengadilan Agama, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2017.
Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2010.
Artadi, I Ketut Artadi, Hukum Perjanjian Kedalam Perancangan Kontrak. Denpasar : Udayana University Press. 2010.
Black’s Law Dictionary. 1979
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group. 2016.
Daud, Mohd Kalam. Dan RIdha Saputra. Problematika Penyelesaian Perkara Kumulasi Gugatan Perceraian dan Harta Bersama (Studi Kasus di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh). Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam , Vol. 1, No. 2, 2017
Hadikusuma, Haliman. Metode Pembuatan Kertas Kerja Atau Skripsi Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju. 1995
Harahap, M. Yahya. Segi-segi Hukum Perjanjian, cet.2 Bandung: Alumni, 1986.
Mantili, Rai. Tanggung Jawab Renteng Ganti Kerugian Immateriil Atas Perbuatan Melawan Dihubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 4 No. 1 September 2019.
Mantili, Rai dan Sutanto. Kumulasi Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Gugatan Wanprestasi dalam Kajian Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Dialogia Iuridica. Vol. 10 No. 2 April 2019.
H.S. Salim. Dan Erlies Septiana Nurbaini. Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Peneltian Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. 2013
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group. 2011
Monolong, Lexy.J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. 2001
L.J. Van Apeldorn L.J. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradanya Paramita. 1975.
Sanggono, Bambang. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 2007
Soejono. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.2010
Sinaga, Niru Anita. Dan Nurlely Darwis. Wanprestasi dan Akibatnya dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian, Jurnal Universitas Suryadarma, 2020
Slamet, Sri Redjeki. Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum : Suatu Perbandingan Dengan Wanprestasi, Jurnal Lex Jurnalica Volume 10 Nomor 2, Agustus 2013
Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. cet. 20. Jakarta: PT. Intermasa, 2004
S. Prayogo. Penerapan Batas-Batas Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum III (2), Mei 2016
Yasardin, Penggabungan Gugatan Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jurnal Varia Peradilan XXXI (362), Januari 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial, Ar-Raniry State Islamic University, Indonesia as the publisher of the journal.
Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
