THE EFFECT OF FRAUD DIAMOND DIMENSIONS AND ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION ON STUDENT ACADEMIC CHEATING BEHAVIOR

Authors

  • Andrea Sifana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Khresna Bayu Sangka Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v14i1.25765

Keywords:

Pendidikan

Abstract

This research aims to determine the influence of diamond fraud dimensions and academic procrastination on academic cheating behavior among students in the Economic Education FKIP UNS undergraduate study program. This research is descriptive quantitative research. The data source for this research comes from primary data from respondents, namely students of the 2020-2023 FKIP UNS Bachelor of Economics Education Study Program. The sampling technique was carried out using simple random sampling. Data collection was carried out by distributing questionnaires containing questions. The validity test was carried out using the Pearson correlation product moment technique. Reliability testing was carried out using the Cronbach's Alpha formula. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistical analysis and statistical analysis including prerequisite tests, partial t tests, and coefficient of determination. The results of this research are that the variables of opportunity and ability have a significant effect on academic cheating behavior. While the variables of pressure, rationalization, and academic procrastination do not have a significant effect on academic cheating behavior. Key words: Pressure, opportunity, rationalization, ability, academic procrastination, and academic cheating.

References

Al Serhan, O., Houjeir, R., Aldhaheri, M. (2022). Academic dishonesty and the diamond fraud: Attitudes of UAE undergraduate business students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Internasional Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 21(10), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.5

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C.O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud examination: Fourth edition. USA: South Western. Chengage Learning.

Arifah, W. (2018). Pengaruh prokrastinasi, tekanan akademik, religiusitas, locus of control terhadap perilaku ketidakjujuran akademik mahasiswa pendidikan akuntansi UNNES. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 106-119. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj

Artani, K., & Wetra, I. (2017). Pengaruh academic self efficacy dan fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa akuntansi di Bali. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 7(2), 123-132.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. Indonesia: ACFE. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/

Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, J. (2006). Using the business fraud triangle to predict academic dishonesty among business students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 10(1), 37-52.

Christiana, A., Kristansi, A., & Pangestu, S. (2021). Kecurangan pembelajaran daring pada awal pandemi covid-19: Dimensi Fraud Pentagon, Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 19(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v19i1.40734

Ferrary, J. R., Johnson, J. L., & McCown, W. G. (1995). Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. US: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0227-6

Ghufron, M. N. & Risnawita, R. (2010). Teori-teori psikologi. Sleman: Ar-Ruzz Media Group.

Hendricks, Bryan. (2004). Academic dishonesty: A study in the magnitude of and justification for academic dishonesty among college undergraduate and graduate students [Thesis]. Rowan University. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/1160

Jones, L. (2011). Academic integrity & academic dishonesty: A handbook about cheating & plagiarism. Florida: Florida Institute of Technology.

Krou, M. R., Fong, C. J., & Hoff, M. A. (2020). Achievement motivation and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic investigation. Educational Psychology Review. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10648-020-09557-7

McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Kenneth D. B. (1996). The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethies-related behavior in the workplace. Business Ethic Quarterly, 6(4), 461-476. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857499

McCabe, Donald., Trevino, Linda K., & Butterfield, Kenneth D. (2001). Cheating in academic institution: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2

Murdiana, Efendri, Kisman, Z., & Kanto, D. S. (2023). The influence of academic pressure, academic procrastination and ability with self efficacy as a moderating variable on student academic fraud behavior. Islamic Banking: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah, 8(2), 375-394. https://shorturl.at/gtyzM

Murdiansyah, I., Sudarma, M., & Nurkholis. (2017). Pengaruh dimensi fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik. (Studi empiris pada mahasiswa magister Akuntansi Universitas Brawijawa). Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 4(2), 121-133. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jaa

Nurkhin, A & Fachrurrozie. (2018). Analisis pengaruh dimensi fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa pendidikan akuntansi UNNES. Liabilities Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 1(1), 1-12. doi. 10.30596/ljpa.v1i1.2026

Nursalam., Bani, Suddin., & Munirah. (2013). Bentuk kecurangan akademik (academic cheating) mahasiswa PGMI fakultas tarbiyah dan keguruan UIN Alauddin Makassar. Lentera Pendidikan, 16(2), 127-138. http://repositori.uin-alauddin.ac.id/id/eprint/5443

Nursani, R. (2014). Perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa: Dimensi fraud diamond. Skripsi: Universitas Brawijaya. http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/107374

Nursani, R., & Irianto, G. (2013). Perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa: Dimensi Fraud diamond. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 2(2), 1-21.

Oktaria, D., Azzahra, S. S., & Angraini, D. (2021). The relationship of academic procrastination and academic dishonesty in undergraduate medical students. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia, 10(3), 207-214. doi: 10.22146/jpki.63137

Patrzek, J., Sattler, S., Veen, F., Grunschel, C., & Fries S. (2014). Investigating the effect of academic procrastination on the frequency and variety of academic misconduct: A panel study. Studies in Higher Education, 40(6),1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.854765

Perkins, M., Gezgin, U., & Roe, J. (2020). Reducing plagiarism through academic misconduct education. Internasional Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00052-8

Pratama, R. D., Sangka, K. B., & Nugroho, J. A. (2023). The influence of fraud diamond perspective and artificial intelligence factors on academic dishonesty Indonesian college student. Internasional Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(11), 164-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i11.5248

Purnamasari, Desi. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa. Educational Psychology Journal, 2(1), 13-21. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/epj

Qudsyi, H., Sholeh, A., & Afsari, N. (2018). Upaya untuk mengurangi ketidakjujuran akademik mahasiswa melalui peer education. Integritas, 4(1), 77-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v4i1.168

Rasyid, A., Wangsya, A., & Putri, D. (2023). Indonesian adaptation of academic procrastination – Short form (APS-S): Validity and reliability. Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology, 9(1), 25-34.

Rosalina, L., Oktarina, R., Rahmiati., & Saputra, I. (2023). Buku ajar statistika. Padang: CV. Muharika Rumah Ilmiah.

Rujoiu, O & Rujoiu, V. (2014). Academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty. An overview. Proceedings of the 8th Internasional Management Conference, 928-938. University of Bucharest.

Santoso, M & Adam, H. (2013). Analisis perilaku kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa Akuntansi dengan menggunakan konsep fraud triangle. (Studi pada mahasiswa S1 Akuntansi Kota Malang. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 2(2).

Sudirman et al. (2014). Metodologi penelitian 1. Bandung: CV. Media Sains Indonesia.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryaningsih, K. (2023). Pengaruh perspektif diamond fraud terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa pendidikan ekonomi Universitas Sebelas Maret dengan moderasi penggunaan teknologi informasi [Universitas Sebelas Maret]. digilib.uns.ac.id

Warni, P & Margunani. (2021). Pengaruh dimensi dalam fraud diamond dan penyalahgunaan teknologi informasi terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik. Business and Accounting Education Journal, 2(3), 36-49. DOI: 10.15294/baej.v3i1.59275

Warsiyah. (2015) Perilaku menyontek mahasiswa muslim. Wahana Akademika, 2(2), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.21580/wa.v2i2.376

Wisnumurti, P. A. (2017). Pengaruh dimensi fraud diamond dan prokrastinasi akademik siswa kelas x dan xi kompetensi keahlian akuntansi di SMK Negeri 2 Kota Tegal tahun 2016/2017 [Skripsi]. Universitas Negeri Semarang. http://lib.unnes.ac.id/id/eprint/30576

Wolfe, D. T & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four element of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38-42. The Fraud diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud (kennesaw.edu)

Wulansuci, R & Laily, N. (2022). Academic cheating: Dimensi fraud diamond theory. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE), 10(2), 154-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jupe.v10n2.p154-160

Yulianto, A., Dahriyanto, L. F., Wijayanti, R., & Adininggar, P. (2020). The effect of fraud pentagon and academic procrastination dimentions towards academic dishonesty of students of social science in senior high school of Semarang. Proceedings of the 1st Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium (PSSHERS), 464, 1158-1169. shttp://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200824.251

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): PIONIR: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN

Section

Articles

License

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).