Hadith Critics Categories in The Selection of Hadith Narrators: A Comparative Analysis

Muhammad Barnaba Ridho Ilahi, Fahrur Razi, Afif Maulana, Babun Najib

Abstract


The abundance of scholarly approaches within the field of hadith studies, particularly disciplines like the science of criticism and verification (jarh wa ta’dil), utilized for classifying the authenticity of a hadith, underscores the significance of discerning between the soundness of the content (matn) and the reliability of the chain of narrators (sanad). In response to this phenomenon, hadith scholars have undertaken comprehensive critical examinations encompassing both the matn and sanad without neglecting their interrelationship. Within the realm of hadith scholarship, the evaluation of the sanad serves as a yardstick for assessing the validity of a hadith, whereby the authenticity of the sanad, untainted by disparagement (jarh), plays a pivotal role in determining the reliability of the hadith. In this study, a quantitative methodology has been employed as supplementary data for a library-based research approach. This choice is justified by the existence of disparate viewpoints among categories of hadith critics, which contribute to the determination of hadith authenticity. Each category of hadith critic adheres to specific criteria when ascertaining the soundness of a hadith. Accordingly, this article delves into an in-depth exploration of the different groups of critics of hadith narrators. The aim is to caution against hastily passing judgments on potentially weak hadiths, preventing their outright dismissal or preclusion as sources of legal evidence (dalil syari). 


Keywords


Critic; Jarh; Ta’dil; Hadith

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adriansyah, Almunadi, ‘METODOLOGI IMAM AL-THAHAWI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MUSYKIL AL-HADIS DENGAN PENDEKATAN MUBHAM AL-HADIS’, Jurnal El-Afkar, 6 no 11 (2017), 65–74

Ahmad Ibn Muhammad ibn Hanbal ibn Hallaj ibn Asad Al-Saibani, Abu Abdillah, ‘Musnad Al-Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal’, in Musnad Al-Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal, 10, juz 10 (Beirut: Mu’assasah Al-Risalah, 2001)

Al Faruq, Ahmad Irsyad, Lukman Zain, and Ahmad Faqih Hasyim, ‘Metode Jarh wa al-Ta’dil Kelompok Mutashaddid dan Mutasahil (Telaah Pemikiran Yahya ibn Ma‘in dan al-Turmudhi Perspektif Sosiologi Pengetahuan)’, Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis, 6.01 (2018), 151

———, ‘Metode Jarh wa al-Ta’dil Kelompok Mutashaddid dan Mutasahil (Telaah Pemikiran Yahya ibn Ma‘in dan al-Turmudhi Perspektif Sosiologi Pengetahuan)’, Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis, 6.01 (2018), 151

Anshori, Muhammad Muhammad, ‘Analisis Ungkapan Ikhtilafu Ummati Rahmah: Originalitas dan Validitas’, Jurnal Living Hadis, 3.1 (2018), 121

Arfan, Arfan, ‘Manhaj Ibn Hibban dalam Kitab al-Ṡiqāt (Kritik Rijāl al-Ḥadīṡ Kategori Majhūl)’, NUKHBATUL ’ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam, 8.1 (2022), 49–69

Ash-shiddieqy, T.M. Hasbi, ‘Sejarah Dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadits / T.M. Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy’, in Sejarah Dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadits / T.M. Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2013), p. 240 [accessed 7 September 2023]

Binasdevi, Misbah, ‘METODOLOGI IMAM AL-BUKHARI DALAM MENENTUKAN CACAT SEBUAH HADIS PADA KITAB AT-TARIKH AL-KABIR JILID II’, 06 (2020)

Budiman, Arif, Edi Safri, and Novizal Wendry, ‘Studi Kritik Hadis Perspektif Jonathan A.C. Brown (Analisis terhadap Three Tiered Method)’, Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 22.1 (2020), 1

Darta, Oleh Ali, ‘APLIKASI AL-JARH WA AL-TA’DIL MUHAMMAD AL-GHAZALI DAN ALI MUSTOFA YA’KUF’, 2019

Gaffar Bedong, Abdul, ‘Al Jarh wa al ta’dil: konstruksi aplikatif terhadap penilaian hadis’, in Al Jarh wa al ta’dil: konstruksi aplikatif terhadap penilaian hadis (Yogyakarta: Bintang Pustaka Madani, 2021), p. 148 [accessed 7 January 2023]

H, Idri, ‘Studi hadis’, in Studi hadis, cet 3 (Jakarta: Kencana, 2016), p. 334 [accessed 7 August 2023]

Hs, Muhammad Alwi, ‘Kajian Hadis Mustafa Azami Sebagai Kerja Hermeneutika (Analisis Kajian Sanad dan Matan Hadis dalam Studies in Hadith Methodologi and Literature Karya Mustafa Azami)’, Jurnal Ushuluddin, 28.1 (2020), 30

Imtyas, Rizkiyatul, ‘METODE KRITIK SANAD DAN MATAN’, Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1.1 (2020), 18–32

Kusroni, Kusroni, ‘Mengenal Tuntas Seluk Beluk Periwayatan Hadis’, Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis, 2.2 (2018), 273

Luthfi, Khabibi Muhammad, ‘KRITIK MATN SEBAGAI METODE UTAMA DALAM PENELITIAN KESAHIHAN HADIS NABI’

Manaf, M Lutfi Abdul, M Fath Ervan Zulfa, and M Nasirudin, ‘KUALIFIKASI PERAWI DAN METODE DALAM PROSES TRANSMISI HADITS’. Volume, 04 (2020)

Miftachurrozaq, Tahmid, and Jannatul Husna, ‘Ilmu Hadis Perspektif Mohammad Hashim Kamali dalam A Textbook of Hadith Studies’, 21.2 (2022)

Muadilah Hs. Bunganegara and I Gusti Bagus Agung Perdana Rayyn, ‘KAEDAH KEDABITAN PERIWAYAT: KAEDAH AL-JARH WA TADHBIT’, Qolamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam, 8.2 (2023), 123–38

Mujibatun, Siti, ‘PARADIGMA ULAMA DALAM MENENTUKAN KUALITAS HADIS DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM KEHIDUPAN UMAT ISLAM’, 14 (2014)

———, ‘PARADIGMA ULAMA DALAM PENENTUAN KUALITAS HADIS DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM KEHIDUPAN UMAT ISLAM’, 17 (2013)

Muzakki, Muhammad Asgar, ‘ANALISA METODOLOGI KRITIK HADIS JALALUDDIN AS-SUYUTHI DALAM AL-LA’AALI AL-MASHNU’AH FI AL-AHADITS AL-MAUDHU’AJ’, AL ISNAD: Journal of Indonesian Hadith Studies, 1.1 (2020), 1–10

Muzayyin, Ahmad, ‘KUALITAS HADIS DITENTUKAN OLEH KUALITAS TERENDAH RAWI DALAM SANAD’, Jurnal Al-Muta’aliyah STAI Darul Kamal NW Kembang kerang, Volume I no 1 (2017), 237–44

Pahrudin, Ade, ‘Tipologi Studi Hadis Kontemporer di Indonesia (Studi Terhadap Artikel Jurnal Terindeks Moraref tahun 2017-2021)’, AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 6.2 (2022), 593

Ritonga, Ahmadi, ‘Telaah Terhadap Manhaj Naqd al-Matn Inda Ulama al-ad an-Nabawi’, 1.1 (2017)

Siregar, Idris, ‘Tahnik dalam Persfektip Hadis (Studi Analisis Sanad Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal dan Sunan At-Turmudzi)’, Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6.3 (2022), 13679–87

Sofiah, Sofiah, ‘KUALITAS SANAD HADIST DALAM KITAB MIFTÂHUL JANNAH KARYA K.H.R AS’AD SYAMSUL ARIFIN SUKOREJO-SITUBONDO’, JURNAL ISLAM NUSANTARA, 2.2 (2018), 189

Taufiqurrahman, Taufiqurrahman, ‘KRITIK HADITS DALAM KAWASAN KAJIAN SEJARAH’, Jurnal Ulunnuha, 8.1 (2019), 89–104

Tilawati, Anis, ‘Kajian Kitab At-Thabaqat Al-Kubra Karya Ibnu Sa’ad’, SINDA: Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Social Studies, 2.2 (2022), 148–60

Zaenuri, Ahmad, ‘TINJAUAN TERHADAP SANAD HADITS KEBOLEHAN MEMUKUL DALAM PENDIDIKAN’, 5 (2017)

Zubaidah, Zubaidah, ‘METODE KRITIK SANAD DAN MATAN HADITS’, Al-Manar, 4.1 (2015)

Zulfikar, Eko, ‘Metode Menentukan Kesahihan Hadis: Teori dan Aplikasi aL-Hakim dalam Kitab aL-Mustadrak ‘Ala Shahihain’, Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, 2.2 (2020), 121–45




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jim.v20i2.16787

Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Barnaba Ridho Ilahi, Fahrur Razi, Afif Maulana, Babun Najib

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

INDEXED BY:

  

EDITORIAL OFFICE:

Syeikh Abdur Rauf Street, Faculty of Islamic Theology and Philosophy Building, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Banda Aceh, Postal Code 23111 Indonesia

Email: Jurnalmuashirah@ar-raniry.ac.id 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats