Model Evaluasi dalam Pelaksanaan Event Pendidikan: A Systematic Literatur Review
Abstract
This study aims to explore research trends on event evaluation models in educational institutions published in online-based journals. This study uses the systematic literature review (SLR) method with the PRISMA approach. The main themes found in this study are the CIPP evaluation model and the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. The originality of this study lies in the presentation of a structured and in-depth literature review, which describes the current state of the evaluation model in the implementation of educational events. The CIPP evaluation model provides a holistic approach to planning, implementing, and measuring outcomes, while the Kirkpatrick model emphasizes more on evaluating the impact of learning and behavioral changes after the event.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Andiya, A. (2023). Model Model Event Based Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini. Anakta : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.35905/anakta.v2i1.5718
Bladen, C. (2021). The Service Semiotics of Luxury Events: An Exploration for Future Research and Events Management Industry Practice. Research in Hospitality Management, 11(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2020.1867374
Bladen, C., & Kennell, J. (2014). Educating the 21st Century Event Management Graduate: Pedagogy, Practice, Professionalism, and Professionalization. Event Management, 18(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599514X13883555341724
Bladen, C., Wilde, N., Kennell, J., & Abson, E. (2022). Events Management: An Introduction. In Events Management (Issue December 2023). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102878
Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal Database Combinations for Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews: A Prospective Exploratory Study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
Ekawati, D. (2022). Analisa Sistem Pembelajaran Daring Pada Mahasiswa Event Manajemen. LEARNING : Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v2i3.1446
Faizin, A., & Kusumaningrum, H. (2023). Review Model-model Evaluasi Program Untuk Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Online. EduManajerial, 1(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.15408/em.v1i1.32245
Hidayat, R., Alam, B. P., Lutvaidah, U., & Santosa, P. P. P. (2023). Implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick Pada Program Pelatihan Penggunaan EYD V SMK Broadcasting Mahardika. Abdi Jurnal Publikasi, 1(5), 436–441. https://jurnal.portalpublikasi.id/index.php/AJP/index436
Jin, X., Weber, K., & Bauer, T. (2019). Impact of Crisis Events on Hospitality and Tourism Demand. Tourism Management, 1(1), 26–35.
Kim, J. B., & Wallace, D. (1997). A Goal-Oriented Design Evaluation Model. ASME 1997 Design Engineering Technical Conferences.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrik, D. L. (1979). Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs. Training and Development Journal, June(January), 178–192.
Lailatussaadah, Hayati, S., & Husna, A. (2024). Event Manajemen dalam Kegiatan Intrakurikuler; A Best Practices in Event Management. Journal Education and Social Science, 2(1), 64–80.
Lailatussadah. (2024). Educationnal Event Management Theory and Practice. In Prodi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam.
Lestari, M. T. (2021). Public Relations Event: Membangun Image, Reputasi dan Mutual Understanding. Prenada Media Group.
Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. At-Ta’dib, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v6i1.551
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & Group, P.-P. (2019). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015 statement. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 47(8), 1177–1185.
Rama, A., Ambiyar, A., Rizal, F., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., & Wulansari, R. E. (2023). Konsep Model Evaluasi Context, Input, Process dan Product (CIPP) di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia), 8(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.29210/30032976000
Rambe, H., Naibaho, M. A., & Siregar, S. M. (2022). Tantangan Belajar Online pada SD Negeri 064037. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 414–420.
Satalkina, L., & Steiner, G. (2020). Digital Entrepreneurship and its Role in Innovation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review as a Basis for Future Research Avenues for Sustainable Transitions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072764
Scriven, M. (1966). The Objectivity of Aesthetic Evaluation. Oxford Journal, 50(2), 159–187.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1975). The Relevance of the CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability. Practitioner, 215(1289), 665–668.
Suhartati, T. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pelatihan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila Bagi Guru Menggunakan Model Kirkpatrick. Educational Technology Journal, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.26740/etj.v2n1.p45-55
Taufiqoh, Z., Sukamto, S., & Lisa, M. (2021). Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick pada Pelatihan Teknis Siaga Covid-19 Berbasis Keluarga Melalui E-learning. Cakrawala, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32781/cakrawala.v15i1.369
Usman, H. (2009). Manajemen: Teori, Praktek, dan Riset Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Utami, H. (2021). Manajemen Event dan Proyek: Antara Konsep dan Praktiknya. UNJ Press.
Welch, V., Petticrew, M., Petkovic, J., Moher, D., Waters, E., White, H., & Tugwell, P. (2015). Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): Explanation and elaboration. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0219-2
Worthen, B. R. (1996). Beyond Formative and Summative Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 17(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409601700203
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ji.v13i2.28565
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.