Restoratif Justice, Diversi dan Peradilan Anak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 110/Puu-X/2012

Authors

  • Dedy Sumardi Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh
  • Mansari Mansari Universitas Iskandarmuda Banda Aceh
  • Maulana Fickry Albaba Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.16010

Keywords:

Diversion, Child Justice, Constitutional Court

Abstract

The Constitutional Court, by Decision No. 110/Law-X/2012, repealed Articles 96, 100, and 101 of Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Child Criminal Justice System, which establishes penalties for judges, prosecutors, and investigators who do not seek discrimination against children who face the law. These provisions have no more binding legal force for judges, police, and prosecutors who do not perform their duties. The study focuses on the implementation of diversity and the impact of child protection before and after the Constitutional Court rulings. The interview data is obtained from the Banda Aceh State Court, supported by library data, and analyzed using a juridico-empirical approach. Based on the analysis of the data, it was found that the execution of diversion in the Banda Aceh State Court before the birth of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 110/PUU-X/2012 was in accordance with the regulations of the laws in force and was accompanied by the threat of criminal offenses. After the birth of the judgment of the Constitutional Court, the execution of differences is an obligation that must be carried out by the judge but is not accompanied by the threat of a criminal offense for a judge who does not perform it. The impact of the ruling of the Constitutional Court is that there is no criminal threat to the judge, JPU, and investigator because the Constitutional Court ruling has declared Articles 96, 100, and 101 to have no binding legal force. Nevertheless, the duty of diversification remains a duty that must be enforced by law enforcement.

Author Biographies

References

Aswita, Yessi. Penjara Di Indonesia: Gagasan Hazairin Ke Arah Modifikasi Sistem Tahanan. Banda Aceh: Turats, 2017.

Canton, Robert. “Theories of Punishment.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507212-3.

Cossins, Annie. “Restorative Justice and Child Sex Offences: The Theory and the Practice.” British Journal of Criminology, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azn013.

Eddyono, Sri Wiyanti. “Restorative Justice for Victim’s Rights on Sexual Violence: Tension in Law and Policy Reform in Indonesia.” Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights 5, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v5i2.28011.

Gade, Christian B.N. “Is Restorative Justice Punishment?” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 38, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21293.

Ghoni, Mahendra Ridwanul, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Melalui Implementasi Diversi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.331-342.

Gillin, John L., and Thorsten Sellin. “Culture Conflict and Crime.” American Sociological Review 4, no. 5 (1939). https://doi.org/10.2307/2083580.

Gultom, Maidin. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dan Perempuan. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2018.

Hasan, Hasbi. “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 2, no. 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.247-262.

Hasona, Yousra. “Child Soldiers and Restorative Justice in the Arab World Countries.” Internet Journal of Restorative Justice 9 (2021).

Hazairin. Tujuh Serangkai Tentang Hukum. 4th ed. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1985.

Hesselmann, Felicitas. “Punishing Crimes of the Mind: Sanctions for Scientific Misconduct as a Case for the Cultural Theory of Punishment.” Theoretical Criminology 23, no. 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618756365.

Hutahaean, Bilher. “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Anak Kajian Putusan Nomor 50/Pid.B/2009/PN.Btg IMPoSING.” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 1 (2013).

Junaidi, Junaidi. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Anak Di Indonesia.” Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization 8, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v8i1.48698.

Kaushal, Swati. “Punishment for Crimes: An Instrument of Social Change.” Proceedings of International Young Scholars Workshop 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.47344/iysw.v9i0.177.

Muhammad, Rusjdi Ali, and Dedy Sumardi. Konflik Dan Kekerasan: Solusi Syariat Islam. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam Aceh, 2014.

Muhammad, Rusli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2022.

Picinali, Federico. “Do Theories of Punishment Necessarily Deliver a Binary System of Verdicts? An Exploratory Essay.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 12, no. 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-017-9440-y.

Prakoso, Abintoro. Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Grafika, 2013.

Ramdlany, Ahmad Agus. “Restorative Justice in Islamic Legal Philosophy Perspective.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 24, no. 2 (2021).

Risnain, Muh. “Kriminalisasi Hakim Dan Eksistensi Prinsip Judicial Independence Dalam Bingkai Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 2, no. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.3.2013.325-336.

Robinson, Luz E., Ashley B. Woolweaver, Dorothy L. Espelage, and Grace Little. “Restorative Justice: A Qualitative Analysis of School Security Perspectives.” Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice 24, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2021.1938008.

Rochaeti, Nur, and Nurul Muthia. “Socio-Legal Study of Community Participation in Restorative Justice of Children in Conflict with the Law in Indonesia.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.35.

Sinatrio, Wikan. “The Implementation of Diversion and Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 4, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i01.23339.

Sodiqin, Ali. “Legal, Moral, and Spiritual Dialectics in the Islamic Restorative Justice System.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 21, no. 2 (2021): 357–78. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v21i2.22675.

Sulistyo, Edhei, Pujiyono, and Nur Rochaeti. “Restorative Justice as a Resolution for the Crime of Rape with Child Perpetrators.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.69.

Sumardi, Dedy, Mukhsin Nyak Umar, Ruslan Sangaji, Firdaus M Yunus, and Rahmatul Akbar. “Transition of Civil Law to Public Law: Integration of Modern Punishment Theory in Criminal Apostasy.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 22, no. 1 (June 30, 2022). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i1.26359.

Sutatiek, Sri. “Konkretisasi Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif (Restoratif Justice) Melalui Diversi Oleh Hakim Anak Di Pengadilan Negeri.” Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan 232 (2012): 53.

Waluyadi. Hukum Perlindungan Anak. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003.

Yunus, Yutirsa. “Analisis Konsep Restorative Justice Melalui Sistem Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 2, no. 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i2.74.

Wawancara dengan Nakhrawi, Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)