Articles

Default Cover for THE DESCRIPTION OF SELF CONTROL IN PERPETRATORS OF CYBERBULYING
Volume 8, Issue 1 (2023)
THE DESCRIPTION OF SELF CONTROL IN PERPETRATORS OF CYBERBULYING
Affiliation Details
  • Yara Andita Anastasya: Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Rini Julistia: Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Widi Astuti: Universitas Malikussaleh
, Pages: 47-56 , DOI: 10.22373/psikoislamedia.v8i1.15078

Abstract

The use of technology and information can increase the risk of the phenomenon of cyberbullying. One of the factors of cyberbullying is self-control. Individuals with high self-control will be able to instruct and control themselves in facing unexpected situations. In contrast, individuals with low self-control lack instruction and control for themselves; hence they tend to behave negatively. This study engaged a descriptive quantitative method using a cluster random sampling of 100 students. The instrument used in this study was a self-control scale. The data were analyzed by engaging descriptive analysis. The result shows that perpetrators of cyberbullying have moderate self-control. High self-control indicates that students can control their behavior, cognition, and decision. Thus, they can control their behavior in various situations to obtain positive consequences. Low self-control indicates that students do some unacceptable actions to their environment, especially in school. The higher self-control is, the lower the negative behavior individuals will take. Suboptimal self-control is caused by low aspects of self-control in behavior, cognition, and decision. The lowest aspect is behavior control, which means that perpetrators of cyberbullying tend to spend time with their peers. Therefore, self-control does not work optimally.

29

TOTAL VIEWS

25

DOWNLOADS

ALTMETRICS

References

Acocella, J, R., & Calhoun, J.F (1990). Psikologi tentang penyesuaian dan hubungan kemanusian: IKIP Press.

Astuti, W., Muna, Z., & Julistia, R. (2021). Gambaran kontrol diri pada siswa SMP Kota Lhokseumawe dalam mencegah perilaku seksual pranikah. Jurnal Diversita, Vol 7 (1), 72-78

Averill, J, R. (1973). Personal Control Over Aversive Stimuli and It’s Relationship to Stress. Psychological Bulletin.

Creswell, J, W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran, Edisi Keempat (Cetakan Kesatu). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Dariyo. (2004). Emotional Parenting. PT: Nuansa Aksara.

Ghufron, M, N., & Risnawati, R. (2017). Teori-Teori Psikologi. PT: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J, W. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem: Journal of School Health. 55 (2): 1-8

Hurlock, E., B. (1980). Psikologi Perkembangan: Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan. PT: Erlangga.

Hurriyanti, D. (2013). Hubungan antara kontrol diri dengan perilaku agresif pada anggota polisi resort pagar alam. Skripsi.

Li, Q. (2005). New bottle but old wine: A research of Cyberbullying in schools. Computer in human behavior.

Mawardah & Adiyanti. (2014). Regulasi emosi dan kelompok teman sebaya perilaku cyberbullying. Jurnal Psikologi. Vol 41, No 1.

Rifauddin, M. (2016). Fenomena cyberbullying pada remaja. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Informasi dan Kearsipan Khizanah Al-Hikmah, Vol 4 (4), 35-44

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Williard, N., E. (2007). Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threat and Distress,

Champaign, IL: Research Press.