KESEJAHTERAAN SUBJEKTIF PADA INDIVIDU BERCERAI (STUDI KASUS PADA INDIVIDU DENGAN STATUS CERAI MATI DAN CERAI HIDUP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/psikoislamedia.v2i1.1820Keywords:
subjective well-being, divorce, widowed and divorced status.Abstract
Divorce is the termination of a marriage or marital union, the canceling and/or reorganizing of the legal duties and responsibilities of marriage as husband and wife. Moreover, divorce can also be interpreted as the status of an individual who lives separately with his/her spouse is deceased and not remarried. Individuals who get divorced has a high or low levels on subjective well-being. It is influenced by several factors such as employments and income levels, social support also religiosity. The research aimed to seek the dynamics of subjective well-being on individuals’ divorced. 50 individuals were selected using purposive and quota sampling technique as research participants. Data collected using Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) and Positive and negative experience Scale (SPANE). Data was analyzed by using Independent sample T-test, which value of significance (p) = 0.669 (p> 0.005), which means that there were no differences in subjective well-being in individual’s divorced with Widowed and Divorced status.References
Amanto, P. R., & Dush, C. M. K. Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, (2005).
Arbiyah, N., Imelda, F.N.,& Oriza, I.D. (2008). Hubungan bersyukur dan subjectivewell-being pada penduduk miskin. Universitas Indonesia. 14(01).
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Sosial dan Kependudukan. Diakses pada tanggal 7 April 2016, dari: https://www.bps.go.id/Subjek/view/id/12.
Dariyo, A. (2004). Memahami Psikologi Perceraian dalam Kehidupan Keluarga. Jurnal Psikologi. 2(2).
Dewi, N.R., & Sudhana, H. (2013). Hubungan antara komunikasi interpersonal pasutri dengan keharmonisan dalam pernikahan. Junal Psikologi Udayana, 1(1), 22-31
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin.95, 542-575.
Diener, E. et al. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing
Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.31-419.
Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2008). Subjective well-being: a general overview. South
African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391-406.
Diener, E., Tamir, M., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Happiness, life satisfaction, and fulfillment: The social psychology of subjective well-being. In P. A. M. van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: The Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches. Hillsdale, NH: Erlbaum.
Dipayanti, S., & Chairani, L. (2012). Locus of control dan resiliensi pada remaja yang orangtuanya bercerai. Jurnal Psikologi, 8(1), 15-20.
DNE., ADH., & MZW. (2015). Kasus Perceraian Meningkat, 70 Persen Diajukan Istri. Diakses pada tanggal 28 Januari 2017 dari: http://health.kompas.com/read/2015/06/30/151500123/Kasus.Perceraian.Meningkat.70. Persen. Diajukan.Istri.
Eddington, N., & Shuman, R. (2005). Subjective well-being (happiness). Continuing Psychology Education.
Gayatri, E. F. (2016). Resiliensi Pada Janda Cerai Mati. Naskah Publikasi. Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Gun. (2016). Kenali Sumber Masalah dan Dampak Perceraian. Serambi Indonesia. Diakses pada tanggal, 21 Maret 2017dari : http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2016/02/17/kenali-sumber-masalah-dan-dampak-perceraian.
Karremans, J. C., Van Lange, P. A. M., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Kluwer, E. (2003). When forgiving enhances psychological well-being: The role of interpersonal commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1011-1026.
Kumalasari, F., & Ahyani, N. L. (2012). Hubungan Antara Dukungan Sosial Dengan Penyesuaian Diri Remaja Di Panti Asuhan. Jurnal Psikologi Pitutur. 1(1).
Larsen, R.J. (2002). Differential contributions of positive and negative affect to subjectivewell-being. In J.A. Da Silva, E.H. Matsushima, and N.P. Riberio-Filho (Eds.), Annualmeeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (vol. 18, pp. 186-190). Rio deJaneiro, Brazil: EditoraLegis Summa Ltda.
Larsen, R.(2009). The Contributions of Positive and Negative Affect to Emotional Well-Being. Psychological Topics 18 (2009), 2, 247-266
Lichter, D. T., Graefe, D. R., & Brown, J. B. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50(1), 60-86.
Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh. Diakses pada tanggal 20 Desember 2015 dari: http://www.ms-aceh.go.id.
Miranda, N., & Amna, Z. (2016). Perbedaan Subjective Well-Being Pada Dewasa Awal Ditinjau Dari Status Pernikahan Di Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Psikologi. 1(3).
Maulida, M., Sari, K. (2016). Hubungan Memaafkan dengan Kesejahteraan Psikologis Pada Wanita yang Bercerai. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Psikologi. 1(3). 7-18
Papalia, E. D., Olds, W. S., & Feldman, D. R. (2009). Human DevelopmentPerkembangan manusia (10th ed). Terjemahan: Brian Marwensdy. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika. 2017, dari: http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2016/02/17/kenali-sumber-masalah-dan-dampak-perceraian.
Puspitasari, T., & Nasfiannor, M. (2005). Komitmen beragama dan subjective well-being. Journal Phronesis. 7. 73-93.
Puteh, J. K. (2013). Sistem sosial dan budaya masyarakat Aceh. Journal Islamic. 202 (201).
Ryff, C. D. (2013). Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of peudaimonia. Psychotherpsychosom, 83, 10-28. doi: 10.1159/000353263.
Sahlan, M. (2012).Pengamatan Sosiologis Tentang Perceraian Di Aceh. Jurnal Subtantia. 14(1).
Sasongko, R. D., Frieda, N. R. H., & Febriana, I. K. (2013). Resiliensi pada wanita usia dewasa awal pasca perceraian di Sendangmulyo, Semarang. Jurnal Empati, 2(3).
Solichatun, Y. (2009). Hidup setelah menikah, mengurai emosi positif dan resiliensi pada wanita tanpa pasangan. Egalita, 4(1).
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Utami, S. M. (2009). Keterlibatan dalam kegiatan dan kesejahteraan subjektif mahasiswa. 36(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)