Perceived Organizational Support Dengan Employee Engagement Pada Karyawan

Muhammad Agung Alkasim, Sowanya Ardi Prahara

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara perceived organizational support dengan employee engagement pada karyawan. Hipotesis  yang diajukan adalah ada hubungan positif antara perceived organizational support dengan employee engagement pada karyawan. Subjek dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 60 orang yang memiliki karakteristik minimal masa kerja lebih dari 1 tahun. Cara pengambilan subjek dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Pengambilan data penelitian ini menggunakan Skala Perceived Organizational Support dan Skala Employee Engagement. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah korelasi product moment dari Karl Pearson. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data diperoleh koefisien korelasi (R) hipotesis sebesar 0,612 dengan p = 0,000 (p < 0,05). Hasil tersebut menunjukan bahwa terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara perceived organizational support dengan employee engagement. Diterimanya hipotesis dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan koefisien determinasi (R2) sebesar 0,375 variabel perceived organizational support menunjukkan kontribusi 37,5% terhadap employee engagement dan sisanya 62,5% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yaitu job characteristic, reward & recognition, perceived supervisor support, dan distributive & procedural justice.

Keywords


perceived organizational support, employee engagement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakker, A. B., & Leiter M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.

Dicke, C., Holwerda, J., & Kontakos., A. (2007) Employee engagement : what do we really know? what do we need to know to take action?, Paris; Marriot Paris Champs-Elyess

Eisenberger, R. Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(4). 698-714.

Endres, G.M & Smoak, L.M. (2008). The human resource craze: human improvement and employee engagement. Organization Development Journal, 26 (1), 69-75.

Gallup (2013). Worldwide, 13% of Employees Are Engaged at Work; Diakses pada tanggal 2 maret 2018.http://news.gallup.com/poll/165269/worldwide-employees-engaged-work.aspx

Gultom, L., Hubies, M., Maarif, M.S., Sukandar, D. (2016), Pengaruh dan hubungan struktur organisasi, budaya organisasi, dan sumber daya manusia dengan kinerja. Konteks: bank umum di Indonesia; Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 20(1), 141-147.

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.

Kahn, William A. (1990). Psychological condition of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4) 692-724.

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Ob urnout. 397–422

Mujiasih., (2015). Hubungan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi (perceived organizational support) dengan keterikatan karyawan (employee engagement). Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 14(1); 40-51.

Otoritas Jasa Keungan, (2018), Statistik Perbankan Indonesia Juli 2018; Diakses Pada 20 September 2018. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-indonesia/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Indonesia---Juli-2018.aspx

R.H. Chenhall. (2004). The rule of cognitif and affective conflict in early implementation of activity-based cost management. Behavioral research in accounting. 16(1), 19–44.

Robbins, S & Judge, T.A. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement Report 408. Brington: Institude for Employement Studies

.

Saks, A.M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6), 600-619.

Schaufeli, W.B, Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: a confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W.B., Kamiyama, K., & Kawakami, N., (2015). Workaholism vs work engagement: the two different predictors of future well-being and performance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 22, 18-23

.

Siringoringgo, (2012), karakteristik dan fungsi intermediasi perbankan di indonesia; Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan.

Watson, S. & Hewett, K., (2006). A multi-theoretical model of knowledge transfer in organizations: determinants of knowledge contribution and knowledge reuse. Journal of Management Studies. 43(2), 141-17




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/psikoislamedia.v4i2.5169

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Muhammad Agung Alkasim, Sowanya Ardi Prahara

PSIKOISLAMEDIA
Published by Faculty of Psychology UIN Ar-Raniry

Journal Secretariat:
Jl. Syeikh Abdur Rauf, Fakultas Psikologi, Kopelma Darussalam UIN Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, 23111,
e-mail: psikoislamedia@ar-raniry.ac.id

INDEXED BY:

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.