Perceived Organizational Support Dengan Employee Engagement Pada Karyawan

Authors

  • Muhammad Agung Alkasim Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta
  • Sowanya Ardi Prahara Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/psikoislamedia.v4i2.5169

Keywords:

perceived organizational support, employee engagement

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara perceived organizational support dengan employee engagement pada karyawan. Hipotesis  yang diajukan adalah ada hubungan positif antara perceived organizational support dengan employee engagement pada karyawan. Subjek dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 60 orang yang memiliki karakteristik minimal masa kerja lebih dari 1 tahun. Cara pengambilan subjek dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Pengambilan data penelitian ini menggunakan Skala Perceived Organizational Support dan Skala Employee Engagement. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah korelasi product moment dari Karl Pearson. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data diperoleh koefisien korelasi (R) hipotesis sebesar 0,612 dengan p = 0,000 (p < 0,05). Hasil tersebut menunjukan bahwa terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara perceived organizational support dengan employee engagement. Diterimanya hipotesis dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan koefisien determinasi (R2) sebesar 0,375 variabel perceived organizational support menunjukkan kontribusi 37,5% terhadap employee engagement dan sisanya 62,5% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yaitu job characteristic, reward & recognition, perceived supervisor support, dan distributive & procedural justice.

References

Bakker, A. B., & Leiter M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.

Dicke, C., Holwerda, J., & Kontakos., A. (2007) Employee engagement : what do we really know? what do we need to know to take action?, Paris; Marriot Paris Champs-Elyess

Eisenberger, R. Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(4). 698-714.

Endres, G.M & Smoak, L.M. (2008). The human resource craze: human improvement and employee engagement. Organization Development Journal, 26 (1), 69-75.

Gallup (2013). Worldwide, 13% of Employees Are Engaged at Work; Diakses pada tanggal 2 maret 2018.http://news.gallup.com/poll/165269/worldwide-employees-engaged-work.aspx

Gultom, L., Hubies, M., Maarif, M.S., Sukandar, D. (2016), Pengaruh dan hubungan struktur organisasi, budaya organisasi, dan sumber daya manusia dengan kinerja. Konteks: bank umum di Indonesia; Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 20(1), 141-147.

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.

Kahn, William A. (1990). Psychological condition of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4) 692-724.

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Ob urnout. 397–422

Mujiasih., (2015). Hubungan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi (perceived organizational support) dengan keterikatan karyawan (employee engagement). Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 14(1); 40-51.

Otoritas Jasa Keungan, (2018), Statistik Perbankan Indonesia Juli 2018; Diakses Pada 20 September 2018. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-indonesia/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Indonesia---Juli-2018.aspx

R.H. Chenhall. (2004). The rule of cognitif and affective conflict in early implementation of activity-based cost management. Behavioral research in accounting. 16(1), 19–44.

Robbins, S & Judge, T.A. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement Report 408. Brington: Institude for Employement Studies

.

Saks, A.M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6), 600-619.

Schaufeli, W.B, Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: a confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W.B., Kamiyama, K., & Kawakami, N., (2015). Workaholism vs work engagement: the two different predictors of future well-being and performance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 22, 18-23

.

Siringoringgo, (2012), karakteristik dan fungsi intermediasi perbankan di indonesia; Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan.

Watson, S. & Hewett, K., (2006). A multi-theoretical model of knowledge transfer in organizations: determinants of knowledge contribution and knowledge reuse. Journal of Management Studies. 43(2), 141-17

Downloads

Published

2020-07-14

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): PSIKOISLAMEDIA : JURNAL PSIKOLOGI

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)