Reception and Practice of Muhammad al-Ghazali’s Thought within the One Day One Juz Community in Medan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v22i2.32447Keywords:
Muhammad al-Ghazali, One Day One Juz, Reception Theory, Qur’anic ThoughtAbstract
This study examines the reception of Muhammad al-Ghazali’s ideas as articulated in his work Kayfa Nata‘āmal ma‘a al-Qur’ān within the One Day One Juz (ODOJ) community in Medan. It focuses on how al-Ghazali’s concept of reflective engagement with the Qur’an is understood, interpreted, and practiced through the community’s daily activity of reading one juz of the Qur’an. Employing a qualitative approach with descriptive-interpretive analysis, this study explores the dynamics of this phenomenon. Three theoretical frameworks—Reception Theory, Social Practice Theory, and Cultural Transformation Theory—are applied to analyze the processes of reception, the formation of everyday religious practices, and the adaptation of classical Islamic thought within the context of modern urban Muslim life. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation of community activities. The findings reveal that al-Ghazali’s teachings inspire spiritual intimacy and the cultivation of pious habits through Qur’anic recitation. The community’s reception is active and contextual, shaped by social, cultural, and digital factors. This study concludes that classical Islamic thought remains relevant and can be effectively integrated into contemporary religious movements in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Afna, Mauloeddin. “Exploring Imam Al-Ghazali ’ s Teachings.” Digital Muslim Review 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–17.
Aiyub, Aiyub, and Isna Mutia. “Muhammad Quraish Shihab’s Methodology in Interpretation of The Qur’an.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu Ashirah 20, no. 1 (January 30, 2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v20i1.16891.
Al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm Al-Dīn. Edited by Juz 1. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, n.d.
Al-Ghazālī, Muḥammad. Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah Bayna Ahl Al-Fiqh Wa Ahl Al-Ḥadīth. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 1989.
Al-Nawawī. Al-Tibyān Fī Ādāb Ḥamalat Al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Dār al-Manār, n.d.
Ali, Mohd Akil Muhamed, Abur Hamdi Usman, Muhd Najib Abdul Kadir, Arif Nazri, and Mohd Faizulamri. “Hermeneutics in the Eye of Al Ghazali.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6, no. 4 (2015): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p39.
Amin, Muhammad, and Muhammad Arfah Nurhayat. “Resepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Al-Quran.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama 21, no. 2 (2020): 290–303. https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v21i2.7423.
Amrulloh, A. “HADIS SEBAGAI SUMBER HUKUM ISLAM (Studi Metode Komparasi-Konfrontatif Hadis-Al- Qur’an Perspektif Muhammad Al-Ghazali Dan Yusuf Al-Qaradawi).” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (2015): 287–310. https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2015.3.2.287-310.
Andiko, Toha, Isna Mutia, and Nazaryani Nazaryani. “THE RULING ON WISHING MERRY CHRISTMAS TO NON-MUSLIMS: AN ANALYSIS OF M. QURAISH SHIHAB’S INTERPRETATIONS.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah 21, no. 1 (June 29, 2024): 139. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v21i1.20040.
Asnawi, Aqdi Rofiq, and Universitas Darussalam Gontor. “A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEMITIC RHETORICAL ANALYSIS , HERMENEUTICS , AND BIBLICAL CRITICISM IN QUR ’ ANIC STUDIES : METHODOLOGICAL” 22, no. 1 (2025): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2011.0003.5.
Dina, Nilna, and Maurisa Zinira. “Ngaji on The Street (One Day One Juz) Wonosobo: Tinjauan Sosiologi Pengetahuan.” Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum 10, no. 2 (2024): 239–52. https://doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v10i2.8078.
Fuaddin, Achmad, Ahmad Nurul Hadi, Sekolah Tinggi, Agama Islam, and Sarang Rembang. “THE TRADITION OF KUNDANGAN IN THE LAST TEN DAYS OF RAMADAN : A STUDY OF LIVING HADITH IN DASIN TUBAN VILLAGE THROUGH THE LENS OF KARL MANNHEIM ’ S SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE .” 21, no. 2 (2024): 214–31.
Gade, Anna M. Perfection Makes Practice: Learning, Emotion, and the Recited Qur’an in Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2004.
Gilani, Sayyid Muhammad Yunus, and Tazul Islam. “Approaches to Integration of Knowledge: A Study of Al-Ghazali And Alwani’s Views.” Journal of Islam in Asia 15, no. 2 (2018): 1689–99.
Gilliot, Claude, and Andrew Rippin. “Approaches to the History of the Interpretation of the Qur’an.” Studia Islamica, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/1596080.
Graham, William A. Beyond the Written Word. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1987.
Habib. “Al-Ghazālī’s Qur’anic Sufi Hermeneutics: Case Study on the Story of Abraham in Search of God.” KALAM 15, no. 02 (2021): 121–44. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/klm.v15i2.9523.
Hajam, Muzaki, Dedeh Nur Hamidah, Aah Syafaah, and Aditia Muara Padiatra. “The Contribution of Al-Ghazali in Promoting Islamic Moderate Thought in Indonesia.” Sunan Kalijaga: International Journal of Islamic Civilization 3, no. 2 (2020): 133–59.
Hariyanti, Puji. “Generasi Muda Muslim Dan Gerakan Sosial Spiritual Berbasis Media Online.” Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI 13, no. 2 (2017): 165–78. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v13i2.671.
Hasib, Kholili, and Neneng Uswatun Khasanah. “The Integration of Rationality and Spirituality: Imam Al-Ghazali’s Experience through Ta’lim Rabbani Approach in Acquiring Knowledge.” Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies 21, no. 1 (2025): 65–83. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v21i1.25377.
Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Vol. 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
Komunitas One Day One Juz. “Profil Komunitas One Day One Juz (ODOJ) 2025].” Jakarta, 2025.
Mariyo. “Konsep Pemikiran Imam Al Ghazali Dalam Relevansi Pola Pendidikan Islam Indonesia Dalam Era Globalisasi.” Journal on Education 05, no. 04 (2023): 13045–56.
Mawardi, Kholid, and Eka Muawali Nurhayah. “Penguatan Kecerdasan Spiritual Anak Melalui Kegiatan Tadarus Al-Qur’an: Studi Kasus Komunitas One Day One Juz Di Purbalingga.” Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender Dan Anak 15, no. 2 (2020): 245–62.
Mufid, Abdul, Abd. Kadir Massoweang, Mujizatullah Mujizatullah, Abu Muslim, and Zulkarnain Yani. “Rereading Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd’s Method of Interpreting Religious Texts.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 79, no. 1 (2023): 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8102.
Mufid, Abdul, Novi D. Nugroho, Ismail Ismail, Retno K. Savitaningrum Imansah, and La Mansi. “The Presence of Anthropological Approaches in Contemporary Readings of Islamic Thought.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 78, no. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7760.
Muḥammad al-Ghazālī. Kayfa Nata‘āmal Ma‘a Al-Qur’Ān. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 1991.
Mursalat. “Reviving the Legacy of Classical Islamic Scholars in the Digital Era : A Study on Ulil Abshar Abdalla ’ s Ngaji Tasawuf Online.” Academic Journal of Islamic Studies 10, no. 1 (2025).
Nadhiroh, Wardatun. “Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an Muhammad Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 15, no. 2 (2014): 281–98. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2014.1502-03.
Oktavia, Gifa, Burhanuddin Burhanuddin, Afifah Febriani, Zainal Asril, and Syafrimen Syafril. “Analysis of Quran Memorization Methods: Academically Talented Students.” Journal of Theory and Research Memorization Quran 1, no. 1 (2025): 40–50.
Puspasari, Cindenia, Samhudi, and Darmadi. “Religion and the Digital Era 5.0: The Existence of Religion among Millennials and Generation Z.” At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Kebudayaan 12, no. 1 (2025): 182–201. https://doi.org/10.32505/tarbawi.v12i1.10868.
Quasem, Muhammad Abdul. “Al-Ghazali - The Recitation and Interpretation of the Qur’an - Al-Ghazali’s Theory.Pdf.” Kuala Lumpur: The University of Malaya Press, 1979.
Roslaili, Yuni, Aris Munandar, Khairani Mukdin, and Maulidatun Rahmi. “ACCESSIBILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF QUR ’ ANIC BRAILLE INSTRUCTION FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED STUDENTS : A CASE STUDY AT BUKESRA , BANDA ACEH” 22, no. 1 (2025): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v22i1.28652.
Saputra, T, and A Wahid. “AL-GHAZALI DAN PEMIKIRANNYA TENTANG PENDIDIKAN TASAWUF.” ILJ: Islamic Learning Journal 8, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54437/iljjislamiclearningjournal.v1i4.1206.
Surizkika, Aldi. “Educational Qualifications Of Du’at: An Analysis Of Muhammad Al-Ghazali (1917-1996) Thought.” Mustaneer : Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 1, no. 1 (2025): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.61630/mjitc.v1i1.5.
Wahid, Abd., Nursyahindah Binti Mahmud, Asnawiyah Asnawiyah, and Nazaryani Nazaryani. “Study on The Nurul Quran Method at The Syakirin Center of Al-Qur’an Education.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah 20, no. 2 (August 30, 2023): 369. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v20i2.19861.
Wati, Nurlaela. Metodologi Penelitian. 1 st Editi. Mujahidin Press, 2021.
Interview with an ODOJ Member, January 12, 2025.
Interview with the ODOJ Coordinator, January 12, 2025.
Interview with an ODOJ Member, January 13, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zamakhsyari Bin Hasballah Thaib (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu'ashirah agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).









