CORRELATION BETWEEN ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE SENTENCE ERRORS AND ABILITY TO PRODUCE GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT UTTERANCES

Masrizal Masrizal

Abstract


This article summarizes and reports an empirical study investigating students’ ability in recognizing grammatical errors and producing grammatically correct sentences. Thirty eight university students were involved in a set of grammar tasks which were specifically created to measure their ability to both identify errors and avoid them in language productions. The main purpose of the study is to prove whether their ability to pinpoint errors within sentences resembles their ability in producing grammatically correct sentences using the same features. The study also measures the appropriateness of the test items in order to see how it affects students’ performance. Final test data collected from the students in two different groups reveal that their ability to recognize sentence errors has positive correlation to their ability to produce correct sentences. The correlation figure among the more proficient students (group 2) is relatively larger, indicating that the amount of knowledge on relevant features positively influences, to a certain extent, the quality of language production and responses.

Keywords


Error Recognition; Sentence Production

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests: OUP Oxford.

FCIT. (2016). Classroom Assessment. Retrieved 10 January 2016, from http://fcit.usf.edu/assessment/selected/responsec.html

Kuncel, N. R., & Sackett, P. R. (2014). Resolving the assessment center construct validity problem (as we know it). Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 38.

Lee, H., & Winke, P. (2013). The differences among three-, four-, and five-option-item formats in the context of a high-stakes English-language listening test. Language Testing, 30(1), 99-123.

Matlock-Hetzel, S. (1997). Basic Concept in Item and Test Analysis. Retrieved 10 January, 2016, from http://ericae.net/ft/tamu/Espy.htm

Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational researcher, 18(2), 5-11.

Read, J. (2015). Assessing English Proficiency for University Study: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rogers, W. T., & Harley, D. (1999). An empirical comparison of three-and four-choice items and tests: susceptibility to testwiseness and internal consistency reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(2), 234-247.

Zheng, Y., & De Jong, J. (2011). Research note: Establishing construct and concurrent validity of Pearson Test of English Academic: Pearson Academic Ltd.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ej.v5i1.1662

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This journal has been viewed times.
View full page view stats report here.


All works are licensed under CC-BY

Englisia Journal
© Author(s) 2019.
Published by Center for Research and Publication UIN Ar-Raniry and Department of English Language Education UIN Ar-Raniry.

Indexed by: