Legal Politics of the Existence of Customary Courts in Civil Procedure Law
Abstract
Along with the development of increasingly modern globalization, the authority and existence of customary institutions for dispute resolution began to be questioned, especially now that some people tend to resolve their disputes through formal institutions such as state courts and the police. This article examines the legal politics of the existence of customary courts in civil procedure law. The research approach is normative juridic and is analyzed through qualitative juridic, which studies data based on legal aspects. The study's findings indicate that legal discrepancies regarding customary justice in the law of civil events remain. However, there is a history of cooperation between the state and the village courts as regulated in Article 86 letter A, article 103, paragraphs (2) and (3). article 120 letter a and article 135 letter a HIR (KUH Perdata Hindia Belanda). Since the entry into force of Emergency Law No. 1 of 1951, these articles have been abrogated, except for Article 135 letter a HIR. The practical implications of the political study of customary law include adopting a common law recognizing the right to justice for indigenous peoples in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdurrahaman. Peradilan Adat Di Aceh Sebagai Sarana Kerukunan Masyarakat. Banda Aceh: Majelis Adat Aceh, 2009.
Anggraeni, Anggita. “Penal Mediation as Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform (2020), 1, no. January (2020): 369–80.
Apriani, Nabilah, and Nur Shofa. “Telaah Eksistensi Hukum Adat Positif Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Aliran Sociological Jurisprudence.” Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 3 (2022): 232–46.
Ayman Shabana. Customs in Islamic Law and Legal Theory: The Development of the Concepts of ’Urf and Adah in Islamic Legal Tradition. Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Law and History, 2010.
Benda-Beckmannn, Franz von, and Keebet von Benda-Beckmannn. “The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 38, no. 53–54 (2006): 1–44.
Djusfi, Apri Rotin. “Keberadaan Tuha Peut Gampong Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hukum Adat Aceh.” Jurnal Public Policy 4, no. 1 (2018): 51–58.
Dzofir, Mohammad, Widodo, Aris, Aziz, Erwati. “The Acculturation of Islam and Customary Law: An Experience of Minangkabau, Indonesia.” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 8, no. 1 (2020): 131–53.
Fakhriah, Efa Laela. Eksistensi Hakim Perdamaian Desa Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Sosiohumaniora. Vol. 18, 2016.
Griffiths, John. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387.
Hamzah, Muhammad Haidirsyah Putra, and Zulkarnain. “Customary Law Impact in The Development of Indonesia’s Criminal Code.” Journal Of Critical Reviews 7, no. 3 (2020): 233–36.
Hasan, Ahmadi. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Berdasarkan Adat Badamai Pada Masyarakat Banjar Dalam Kerangka Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2007.
Jamin, Mohammad. Eksistensi Peradilan (Desa) Adat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Desa. Surakarta: UNS Press, 2015.
———. Peradilan Adat (Pergeseran Politik Hukum, Perspektif Undang-Undang Otonomi Khusus Papua). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2014.
Judiasih, Sonny Dewi, and Hazar Kusmayanti. Pergeseran Norma Hukum Waris Adat Di Indonesia. Bandung: Unpad Press, 2020.
Kamaruddin, Iswandi, Andi Yaqub, Layyin Mahfiana, and Muh Akbar. “Justice, Mediation, and Kalosara Custom of the Tolaki Community in Southeast Sulawesi from the Perspective of Islamic Law.” Samarah 7, no. 2 (2023).
Kusmayanti, Bambang Daru Nugroho Hazar. “Legal Protection for Marriages of Traditional Beliefs Adherents in Indonesia.” Nat. Volatiles & Essent. Oils 8, no. 5 (2021): 10297–308.
Kusmayanti, Hazar. “Patterns of Religious Magic Customary Law in Traditional Sundanese Wiwitan Marriage in West Java.” Sasi 29, no. 3 (2023): 579–88.
———. “Praktik Beracara Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat Sumatera Barat Berdasarkan Asas Bajanjang Naiak Batanggo Turun.” Refleksi Hukum 6, no. 2 (2022): 185–202.
Lukito, Ratno. “The Enigma of National Law in Indonesia: The Supreme Court’s Decisions on Gender-Neutral Inheritance.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 38, no. 52 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2006.10756594.
Mawar, Sitti. “Perkembangan Sistem Hukum Peradilan Adat Aceh.” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum 10, no. 1 (2021).
Mufid, Mufid. “Mediasi Dalam Hukum Adat.” Al-Manhaj: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Family Law 2, no. 2 (2020): 128. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-manhaj.v2i2.3490.
Muhammad, Rusjdi Ali. “Reconciliation for the Settlement of Criminal Cases: Reactualization of Local Wisdom in Indonesian Criminal Law [Upaya Perdamaian Untuk Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana: Reaktualisasi Kearifan Lokal Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia].” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum 10, no. 2 (November 19, 2021): 171.
Muhazir, Muhazir. “Islam, Fatwa Dan Negara: Meretas Pluralisme Hukum Perceraian Di Aceh.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i2.5150.
Nugroho, Jati. “Restore Recognition Of Legal Pluralism As A National Law Development Model That Is Justice.” Law & Justice Review Journal 1, no. 1 (2021).
Parmar, Pooja. Indigenity and Legal Pluralism in India (Cambridge Studies In Law and Society). New York: First Publish 32 Avenue of The Americas, 2018.
Poesoko, Herowati. Paradigma Pengadilan Adat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Perdata Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Laksbang Justitia Surabaya, 2015.
Putra Jaya, Nyoman Serikat. “Hukum (Sanksi) Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 45, no. 2 (2016): 123.
Putra, Lili Rasjidi dan Wyasa. Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sistem. Bandung: Manda Maju, 2003.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Relevansi Hukum Adat Dengan Modernisasi Hukum Kita. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UII, 1998.
Raharjo, Trisno. “Mediasi Sebagai Bentuk Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana.” Jurnal Media Hukum 17, no. 2 (2010).
Ross, Richard J. Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500-1850. Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500-1850, 2013. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814771167.001.0001.
Ryngaert, Cedric M. J., Hora Siccama, Duco W. “Ascertaining Customary International Law: An Inquiry into the Methods Used by Domestic Courts.” Netherlands International Law Review 65, no. 1 (2018): 1–25.
Sarmono, Mulya. “Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat.” Jurnal Adhikari 2, no. April (2023): 468–78.
Sayuthi, Sayuthi, and Dedy Sumardi. “Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Dalam Masyarakat Aceh.” Indonesian Journal of Shariah and Justice 1, no. 2 (2021).
Simarmata, Icardo. “Filosofi Dan Prinsip Peradilan Adat.” In Memperkuat Kapasitas Peradilan Adat Melalui Penyusunan Pedoman Peradilan Adat Di Kalimantan Tengah, 18 Juli 2013, 20. Palangkaraya: Kementerian PPN/Bappenas dan SAJI Project UNDP, 2013.
Sinaga, Erlina Maria Christn, and Sharfna Sabila. “Politik Legislasi Hukum Tidak Tertulis Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 8, no. 1 (2019): 2.
Soemadiningrat, Otje Salman. Rekonseptualisasi Hukum Adat Kontemporer. Bandung: Alumni, 2015.
Srimulyani, Eka. “Islam, Adat, and the State: Matrifocality in Aceh Revisited.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 2010.
Sumardi, Dedy. “Islam , Pluralisme Hukum Dan Refleksi Masyarakat Homogen.” Asy-Syirah Jurnal Ilmu Syaria’ah Dan Hukum 50, no. 2 (2016).
Sumardi, Dedy, Ratno Lukito, and Moch Nur Ichwan. “Legal Pluralism Within The Space of Sharia: Interlegality of Criminal Law Traditions in Aceh, Indonesia.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (2021): 426–49. https://doi.org/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9303.
Wignjodipuro, Soerojo. Pengantar Dan Azas-Azas Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 2017.
Wiratraman, Herlambang P. “Perkembangan Politik Peradilan Adat.” Mimbar Hukum 30, no. 3 (2018): 490–502.
Wojkoswka, Ewa. “How Informal Justice System Can Contribute.” In United Nations Development Program Oslo Governance Centre, 11. Oslo, 2006.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v13i1.23079
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Hazar Kusmayanti, Madiha Dzakiyyah Chairunnisa, Dede Kania, Rafan Darodjat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by Islamic Criminal Law Department, Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.