Restorative Justice
Antithesis or New Face of The Punishment Model?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v14i2.31892Keywords:
Restorative Justice, Retributive Justice, Punishment, RehabilitationAbstract
Restorative Justice is increasingly adopted to overcome the limitations of retributive punishment, which emphasizes inflicting suffering on offenders. However, a fundamental theoretical debate remains regarding the ontological status of Restorative Justice: whether it is merely a non-penal mechanism outside the concept of punishment or a transformative form of punishment within the modern penal framework. This research examines this debate by determining the proper positioning of Restorative Justice in modern sentencing policy. The purpose of this study is to reconstruct the penal paradigm by integrating restorative, utilitarian, and moral-communitarian values into a more humane and inclusive system of punishment. Using normative legal research with a conceptual approach, this study analyzes theories, legislation, and judicial practices related to Restorative Justice in Indonesia. The findings suggest that Restorative Justice still retains punitive elements, as offenders are required to acknowledge wrongdoing and repair the harm. Consequently, Restorative Justice ought not to be classified as an exclusively non-penal mechanism but rather as an evolution of punishment that prioritizes reconciliation, moral accountability, and social restoration. This study concludes that Restorative Justice represents the new face of punishment, where the ultimate aim is no longer solely retribution but the restoration of social balance and substantive justice for victims, offenders, and society.
References
Antonsdóttir, Hildur Fjóla. “Beyond Restorative Justice: Survivors’ Calls for Innovative Practices in Iceland.” In Re-Imagining Sexual Harassment, 172–92, 2023.
Asadullah, Muhammad. “Decolonization and Restorative Justice: A Proposed Theoretical Framework.” Decolonization of Criminology and Justice 3, no. 1 (2021): 27–62.
Bennett, Christopher. “Desert and Dissociation.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 10, no. 1 (2024): 116–34.
Braithwaite, John. Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. England: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Brink, David O. “Two Kinds of Desert.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023, 1–22.
Caruso, Gregg D. “Justice without Retribution: An Epistemic Argument against Retributive Criminal Punishment.” Neuroethics 13, no. 1 (2020).
Colorado, Restorative Justice. “Practices & Models,” 2025.
Duus-Otterström, Göran. “Do Offenders Deserve Proportionate Punishments?” Criminal Law and Philosophy 15, no. 3 (2021): 463–80.
Ezebuiro, Anthony Udoka, and Innocent Anthony Uke. “The Moral Limit of Aristotle’s Corrective Justice.” SAPIENTIA 19 (2023): 229.
Foley, Tony. Developing Restorative Justice Jurisprudence: Rethinking Responses to Criminal Wrongdoing. Developing Restorative Justice Jurisprudence: Rethinking Responses to Criminal Wrongdoing, 2016.
Gade, Christian B.N. “Is Restorative Justice Punishment?” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 38, no. 3 (2021).
Goldblum, Andrea. “Restorative Justice From Theory To Practice.” In Reframing Campus Conflict: Student Conduct Practice through the Lens of Inclusive Excellence, Second Edition, 209–27, 2023.
Ismail, Dian Ekawaty, Yusna Arsyad, Ahmad Ahmad, Novendri M Nggilu, and Yassine Chami. “Collocation of Restorative Justice with Human Rights in Indonesia.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 32, no. 2 (2024): 394–417.
Josephine, Johnson Ngoba. “A Kantian Elaboration of Braithwaite’s Restorative Justice: Dispelling Illusions.” University of Saskatchewan, 2024.
Kelly, Lisa M. “Judging Youth Time.” The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 108, no. 1 (2023): 85–107.
Kim, Matthew D. “Redesigning Restorative Justice for Criminal Justice Reform.” 6th Edition 88, no. 4 (2021): 947–1010.
Lodi, Ernesto, Lucrezia Perrella, Gian Luigi Lepri, Maria Luisa Scarpa, and Patrizia Patrizi. “Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022.
Maglione, Giuseppe, Jamie Buchan, and Laura Robertson. “The Local Provision of Restorative Justice in Scotland: An Exploratory Empirical Study.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 28, no. 4 (2022): 617–40.
Maiese, Michelle. “Retributive Justice.” Beyond Intractability Essay, 2020.
Marshall, Christopher D. “Restorative Justice.” Religion Matters: The Contemporary Relevance of Religion, 2020, 101–17.
Marshall, Julia, Anton Gollwitzer, and Paul Bloom. “Why Do Children and Adults Think Other People Punish?” Developmental Psychology 58, no. 9 (2022): 1–23.
Marshall, Tony. “Restorative Justice: An Overview.” Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate, 1999.
Meléndez, Anna. “The Role of Criminogenic Needs and Emotions in Restorative Justice: Offenders’ Experiences in Victim–Offender Mediation.” European Journal of Probation 13, no. 1 (2021): 21–40.
Meyer, Jon’a F. “Retributive Justice.” Britannica, 2025.
Ness, Daniel Van, Allison Morris, and Gabrielle Maxwell. “Introducing Restorative Justice.” In Restorative Justice for Juveniles Conferencing, Mediation and Circles, edited by Allison Morris and Gabrielle Maxwell. Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2001.
Ness, Daniel W. Van, and Karen Heetderks Strong. Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice: Fifth Edition. Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice: Fifth Edition, 2014.
Nortje, Windell, and Brenda Nanyunja. “An Appraisal of the Kwoyelo Judgment at the International Crimes Division in Uganda: A Tale of Retribution or Restoration?” Journal of International Criminal Justice 0, no. 0 (2025): 1–17.
Okafor, Oliver Nnamdi. “Shaming of Tax Evaders: Empirical Evidence on Perceptions of Retributive Justice and Tax Compliance Intentions.” Journal of Business Ethics 182, no. 2 (2023): 377–95.
Pranis, Kay. “Restorative Values.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice, edited by Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness. Devon: Willan Publishing Culmcott House Mill Street, Uffculme, 2007.
Reference, Oxford Paperback. Oxford Dictionary of Law. Oxford Paperback Reference. Vol. 20, 2003.
Rizanizarli, Rizanizarli, Mahfud Mahfud, Riza Chatias Pratama, and Fikri Fikri. “The Application of Restorative Justice for Children as Criminal Offenders in the Perspective of National Law and Qanun Jināyat.” Samarah 7, no. 1 (2023).
Rossner, Meredith, and Helen Taylor. “The Transformative Potential of Restorative Justice: What the Mainstream Can Learn from the Margins.” Annual Review of Criminology, 2024.
Shapland, Joanna, Jamie Buchan, Steve Kirkwood, and Estelle Zinsstag. “Creating a People-Centred View of Risk and Restorative Justice.” Criminology and Criminal Justice 24, no. 5 (2024): 1047–68.
Sumardi, Dedy, Mansari Mansari, and Maulana Fickry Albaba. “Restoratif Justice, Diversi Dan Peradilan Anak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 110/Puu-X/2012.” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum 11, no. 2 (2022): 248–65.
Suzuki, Masahiro. “Revisiting the Real Story of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System: 20 Years On.” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 65, no. 2 (2023): 1–34.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes. Criminal Justice Handbook Series, 2006.
University, Park. “The Role of Restorative Justice in Modern Criminal Justice Administration,” 2024.
Willigenburg, Theo Van, and Eduardus Van Der Borght. “Attacking Punitive Retribution at Its Heart - A Restorative Justice Thrust.” International Journal of Public Theology 15, no. 3 (2021): 401–25.
Wilson, Amanda. “What a Shame! Restorative Justice’s Guilty Secret.” In Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 61:39–52, 2022.
Wood, William R., and Masahiro Suzuki. “Getting to Accountability in Restorative Justice.” Victims and Offenders 19, no. 7 (2024): 1400–1423.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Erwin Susilo, Bagus Sujatmiko, Karell Mawla Ibnu Kamali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)
