Judicial Discretion in Criminal Justice
Challenges, Implications, and Comparative Lessons from Indonesia and the Netherlands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v14i2.32581Keywords:
Rechtelijk Pardon, Judicial Pardon, Criminal Law ReformAbstract
This article discusses the challenges and implications of applying the principle of judicial pardon rechtelijk pardon in the Indonesian legal system, by comparing similar concepts that have already been implemented in the Netherlands. This principle grants judges the discretion not to impose criminal penalties on perpetrators who are proven guilty if their actions are deemed minor, taking into account the principles of justice and humanity. This study employs a normative juridical method, utilizing a legislative, historical, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results show that the Dutch legal system has comprehensively implemented rechtelijk pardon, supported by consistent procedural law and jurisprudential practice. Conversely, the application of this principle in Indonesia still faces significant challenges due to the lack of synchronization between the substantive law in the 2023 Criminal Code and the formal law in the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as the absence of clear technical guidelines for judges to apply it. As a result, the principle of judicial pardon has the potential to become a symbolic norm without effective operationalization. This article emphasizes the importance of harmonizing the legal system and strengthening the implementation of regulations so that this principle can function optimally as an instrument of humanistic justice in national criminal law
References
Anandy Satrio P. “Rechterlijk Pardon: Gagasan Dan Tantangan Instrumen Humanisme Hukum.” MA RI News, 2025.
Ariyanti, Vivi. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Yang Berkeadilan Gender Dalam Ranah Kebijakan Formulasi, Aplikasi, Dan Eksekusi.” Halu Oleo Law Review 3, no. 2 (2019): 178–95.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1998.
Badejogbin, Rebecca Emiene. “Judicial Discretion: Problematizing the Ascertainment and Application of Customary Law by Formal Courts and Relevant Theories (Nigeria and South Africa).” Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis 54, no. 2–3 (2022).
Bunt, Henk Van De, and Jean Louis Van Gelder. “The Dutch Prosecution Service.” Crime and Justice 41, no. 1 (2012).
“Constitutional Law. Power of the Executive to Pardon. Criminal Contempt.” The Yale Law Journal 38, no. 6 (1929).
“Criminal Law. Pardon. Effect as Obliterating Conviction.” Harvard Law Review 41, no. 7 (1928).
Estiningtyas, Aulia Rizka, Ulfatul Hasanah, and Rusmilawati Windari. “Comparison of the Legal Regulation of the Rechterlijk Pardon in Indonesia and The Netherlands.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 6, no. 1 (2024).
Farikhah, Mufatikhatul. “Konsep Judicial Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) Dalam Masyarakat Adat Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Media Hukum 25, no. 1 (2018).
———. “Rekonseptualisasi Judicial Pardon Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia Dengan Sisitem Hukum Barat).” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48, no. 3 (2018): 556–88.
———. “The Judicial Pardon Arrangement as a Method of Court Decision in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law Procedure.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2021).
Gennaioli, Nicola, and Andrei Shleifer. “Judicial Fact Discretion.” Journal of Legal Studies 37, no. 1 (2008).
Hamzah, A. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Beberapa Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
Hamzah, Jur Andi. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Beberapa Negara (Edisi Ketiga). Sinar Grafika, 2024.
Harefa, Beniharmoni, and Abdul Kholiq. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2024.
Hart, Zachary R. “Managing Judicial Discretion: Qualified Immunity and Rule 12(b)(6) Motions.” Indiana Law Journal 97, no. 4 (2022).
Haswa, Maher, and Suhaib Walid Sharaiyra. “Rationale Verification and Its Applications in Judicial Discretion.” Islamic Quarterly 68, no. 2 (2024).
Hilmi, Winan, and Rizqin Prijatna. “Bagaimana Pengaturan Rechterlijke Pardon Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Pidana ?,” 2024.
HukumOnline. “Penerapan Ketentuan Judicial Pardon Dinilai Masih Bersifat Abstrak , Sehingga Dari Satu Kasus Ke Kasus Lainnya Bisa Saja Penerapannya Berbeda .,” 2024.
Ika, Mulianita, and others. “Penerapan Asas Permaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional.” Universitas BATANGHARI Jambi, 2023.
Kammerhofer, Jörg. “Beyond the Res Judicata Doctrine: The Nomomechanics of ICJ Interpretation Judgments.” Leiden Journal of International Law, 2023, 1–27.
King, Tyler J., and Mariana Valverde. “The Multiple Realities of Legal Objects: Accounting for ‘Ontological Discretion’ in Criminal Courts.” Law and Social Inquiry, 2025.
Laksita, Doni. “Implementasi Pemaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Dalam KUHP Nasional.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 10, no. 6 (2025): 161–77.
Meliala, Nefa Claudia. “Rechterlijk Pardon : (Judicial Pardon) : An Effort Toward Criminal Justice System With Restorative Justice Paradigm.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 8, no. 3 (2020).
———. “Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim): Suatu Upaya Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dengan Paradigma Keadilan Restoratif.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 8, no. 3 (2020): 551–68.
Nilvany Hardicky, Riadi Asra Rahmad, and Heni Susanti. “Policy Formulation of The Rechterlijk Pardon Concept (Judge’s Forgiveness) In Traffic Accident Criminal Cases.” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 4, no. 6 (2024).
Nir, Esther, and Siyu Liu. “The Challenge of Imposing Just Sentences Under Mandatory Minimum Statutes: A Qualitative Study of Judicial Perceptions.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 33, no. 2 (2022).
Nowacki, Jeffrey S. “Race, Ethnicity, and Judicial Discretion: The Influence of the United States v. Booker Decision.” Crime and Delinquency 61, no. 10 (2015).
Pujinoto, Sisno, Anis Mashdurohatun, and Achmad Sulchan. “Juridical Analysis Of Application Of Forgiveness (Rechterlijk Pardon) As A Basis Of Judge Consideration In Deciding The Criminal.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 3, no. 2 (2020).
Ramadhita, Ramadhita, Ali Mahrus, and Bachri Syabbul. “Gender Inequality and Judicial Discretion in Muslims Divorce of Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (2023).
Reyes Molina, Sebastián A. “Judicial Discretion as a Result of Systemic Indeterminacy.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 33, no. 2 (2020).
Saputro, Adery Ardhan. “Konsepsi Rechterlijk Pardon Atau Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Rancangan KUHP.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 28, no. 1 (2016).
Schabas, William A. “Prosecutorial Discretion v. Judicial Activism at the International Criminal Court.” In Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 6, 2008.
Sudarto. Hukum Pidana Dan Perkembangan Masyarakat. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1983.
Sugiharto, Gatot, Mira Julita Sari, Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny, and Fauzan Muhammadi. “Analysis Of Legal Discovery Methods By Judges In Rechterlijk Pardon’s Perspective to Solve Criminal Cases.” Jurnal Jurisprudence, 2024.
Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.
Suryawan, Ridwan. “Asas Rechtelijk Pardon (Judicial Pardon) Dalam Perkembangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 2, no. 3 (2021): 170–77.
Syed Raza Shah Gilani, Ali Mohammed Al-Matrooshi, and Ms. Aisha Nayab Qureshi. “Supremacy of the Parliament and the Rule of Law in the UK: An Analysis.” Journal of European Studies (JES) 40, no. 1 (2024).
Tsebelis, George. “What Determines the Judicial Discretion of the European Court of Human Rights?” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, 2022.
Wermink, Hilde, Brian D. Johnson, Paul Nieuwbeerta, and Jan W. de Keijser. “Expanding the Scope of Sentencing Research: Determinants of Juvenile and Adult Punishment in the Netherlands.” European Journal of Criminology 12, no. 6 (2015).
Widyawati, Anis. “Criminal Policy of Adultery in Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 5, no. 1 (2020): 107–29.
Yusuf, Muhammad Rifai, Briliyan Erna Wati, M. Harun, and Nurhayati. “Overview of the Judge’s Forgiveness Concept: Is Relation to the Legal Interests of Criminal Victims.” Walisongo Law Review 3, no. 1 (2021).
Statute
Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code
Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System
Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power
Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dean Putri Amelia, Beniharmoni Harefa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)
