Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The Peurawi Journal focuses on the study of da'wah and communication. The study of da'wah and communication which focuses on universal and Islamic values by upholding diversity and humanity. Peurawi Journal studies are published based on research results both theoretically and practically, which include:

  1. Journalism: Journalism developed and published follows the rules of scientific work, the values of peace, the environment, and development to achieve the truth obtained through in-depth study.
  2. Public Relations: Public Relations published and developed based on ethics and work mutually beneficial ethics, to build togetherness between institutions, internal and external public.
  3. Intercultural: Intercultural communication studies are published and developed based on multicultural values in various propaganda and communication developments for the realization of a just, authoritative, and civilized society.
  4. Political Communication: Political communication is published and developed based on ethics and morals in realizing and exercising power and harmony of various interest groups for the welfare of society.
  5. New Media and Communication Technology: The study of the novelty of communication science in the form of new communication to simplify forms of communication by using internet media as the main means in the field of information technology. The emergence of new media, especially social media, has led to changes in communication patterns, patterns of interaction, and new habits that are important and interesting things to study and publish in the Peurawi Journal.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Jurnal Peurawi uses a double-blind review policy, in which both the author(s)' and the reviewer(s)' identity is kept hidden until the manuscript is accepted for further editing and publication.

Each submitted manuscript is evaluated on the following basis:

  1. The originality of its contribution to the field of scholarly publishing;
  2. the soundness of its theory and methodology gave the topic;
  3. the coherence of its analysis;
  4. its ability to communicate to readers (grammar and style)

Normal turn-around time for screening and evaluation of manuscripts is four to six months from the date of receipt. Based on reviewers' recommendations, the Editorial Board of Jurnal Peurawi has full rights to decide article status (whether accepted or not). Articles submitted to the Jurnal Peurawi can use either English, or Bahasa Indonesia. However, writing abstracts in English is a must.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Peurawi is published by the UIN Ar-Raniry Postgraduate Program in Islamic Communication and Broadcasting (S2) in Banda Aceh. This journal is published twice a year in April and October. 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Author Fee

Jurnal Peurawi (JP) DOES NOT CHARGE fees for any submission, article processing (APCs), and publication of the selected reviewed manuscripts. A Journal subscription is also open to any individual without any subscription charges.
All published manuscripts will be available for viewing and download from the journal portal for free.

 

Screening for Plagiarism Policy

To ensure the originality of the articles, Jurnal Peurawi uses various plagiarism checkers available. The most common tools used are Google search engine, plagiarism checker, viper, duplichecker.com, and Copyleaks.com. Plagiarism check is conducted in the screening process of the submitted manuscripts. Only plagiarism-free manuscripts are sent to the assigned editor(s) to be followed up with the review process. Submissions with minor plagiarism issues will be notified to revise and resubmit, while manuscript with serious plagiarism issues will be rejected and archived.

 

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statements

Jurnal Peurawi is a peer-reviewed national journal, available in print and online and published twice a year (February and August). This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Graduate Program of UIN Ar-Raniry, Indonesia). This statement is based on COPE & Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Peurawi is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.
Graduate Program of State Islamic University of Ar-Raniry as publisher of Jurnal Peurawi takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Graduate Program of State Islamic University of Ar-Raniry and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Peurawi is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

DUTIES OF AUTHORS

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements are unacceptable and constitute unethical behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works. If the authors have used the work and/or words of others, it must be appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

Code of Conduct, Publication Ethics and Roles Responsibilities

Jurnal Peurawi aims to ensure highest ethical standards for publication to accept high-quality scientific publications and public trusts in scientific findings, as well as to promote authors of manuscripts receive credit for their ideas. All processes are maintained adhering to the Publication Ethics (COPE) and its Best Practice Guidelines in every possible way.

Plagiarism

Manuscripts that are found to have been plagiarized from a manuscript by other authors will be considered as plagiarism. Plagiarism screening process will take place at the beginning of the review process prior to being handed to the reviewer(s) and in the editing process. In case of plagiarism is detected after the manuscript is published, the editor will immediately remove the article from the issue list with notification of publication ethics infringement.

Duplicate Submission

Manuscripts that are found to have been published elsewhere, or to be under review elsewhere will be considered as violation of duplicate submission. If authors have used their own previously published work, or work that is currently being reviewed, as the basis for a submitted manuscript, they are required to properly cite the previous work to avoid self-plagiarism (auto-plagiarism) once after both manuscripts are published.

Citation Manipulation

Submitted manuscripts that are found to include false citations whose primary purpose is to increase the number of citations to a particular author's work or articles published in any particular journal is considered a violation of citation manipulation.

Data Falsification

Submitted manuscripts that are found to have falsified research results and findings (including the manipulation of graphs, images, or charts) will be considered as a violation of data falsification.

Improper Author Attribution

All sources reiterated in the submitted manuscript must be given proper attribution as required by the license derived by the original source.

Conflicts of Interest

Jurnal Peurawi encourages authors to avoid any Conflicts of interests (COIs, also known as ‘competing interests’) that occur when issues outside research could be reasonably perceived to affect the neutrality or objectivity of the work or its assessment. However, any occuring potential conflicts of interest must be declared – whether or not they actually had an influence – to allow informed decisions. In most cases, this declaration will not stop work from being published nor will it always prevent someone from being involved in a review process.

Upon cases of uncertainty, declaration of a potential interest or discussion with the editors is highly encouraged. Undeclared interests may lead to consequences of rejection or being re-assessed that might cause to be retracted from being published.

Conflicts of interest include:

  1. Financial – funding and other payments, goods and services received or expected by the authors relating to the subject of the work or from an organization with an interest in the outcome of the work.
  2. Affiliations – being employed by, on the advisory board for, or a member of an organization with an interest in the outcome of the work.
  3. Intellectual property – patents or trademarks owned by someone or their organization.
  4. Personal – friends, family, relationships, and other close personal connections.
  5. Ideology – beliefs or activism, e.g. political or religious, relevant to the work.
  6. Academic – competitors or someone whose work is critiqued.

Authors must declare current or recent funding and other payments, goods or services that might influence the work. All funding, whether a conflict or not, must be declared in the ‘Acknowledgments’. Declared conflicts of interest (if any) will be considered by the editor and reviewers and included in the published article.

Editors and reviewers should not be involved with a submission when they:

  1. Have a recent publication or current submission with any author.
  2. Collaborate or recently collaborated with any author.
  3. Have a financial interest in the subject of the work.
  4. Experience inability to be objective.

In any way possible, Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura aims to avoid assigning submissions to editors and inviting reviewers, should there is a conflict of interest; in which they should decline in any of the above situations and declare any conflicts to the journal. Reviewers must declare their interests in the ‘Confidential’ section of the review form, which will be considered by the editor. Close competitors should consider declining. Editors and reviewers must declare if they have previously discussed the manuscript with the authors during the initial editorial meeting.

Sanctions of mentioned violations

In the event that there are evidence of violations of any of the above mentioned policies in any journal, regardless of whether or not the violations occurred in a journal published by Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura , the following sanctions will be considered:

  1. Immediate rejection of the infringing manuscript.
  2. Immediate rejection of every other manuscript submitted to Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura by the author(s) of the infringing manuscript for 2 subsequent issues (12 months).
  3. Blacklisted as author or demoted user access from author to reader
  4. Prohibition against all of the authors from serving on the Editorial Board of Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura .

In cases where the violations of the above policies are found to be particularly severe, the publisher reserves the right to impose additional sanctions beyond those described above.

Responsibilities

Author(s) responsibilities:

  1. The author should present manuscript or research results as clearly, honestly, plagiarism-free, and ensures no manipulation of data.
  2. The author is responsible to confirm submission statements of the manuscripts that have been proposed and written in the submission process.
  3. The author must adhere to the requirements of publication in the form of original paper, no-plagiarism, and has never been published in journal or other publication.
  4. The author must show reference of opinion and other literature being cited.
  5. The author must write a manuscript or article by carrying ethic, honest and responsible as the valid scientific authorial regulation.
  6. The author is prohibited to send similar manuscript any other journal or publication.
  7. The author must hold no objection if the submitted manuscript is being corrected without changing its basic idea or substance.

Editor(s) responsibilities:

  1. The editors of Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura are responsible in deciding articles to be published through editorial meetings. Editor is guided by policies and journal editorial restricted by valid law concerning defamation, copyright violation and plagiarism.
  2. In the process of articles acceptance, editor team works based on editorial procedures and requirement as stated in the journal policies and guidelines.
  3. In the process of journal review and decision of publication (of the manuscript), the editor team does not discriminate any races, sexes, religions ethnic, citizenship, or ideology of political writer.
  4. Editor and editorial team will not open any information about manuscript or article except there is permissions from the author(s).
  5. A manuscript that is not published after being proposed (as submission) will be returned directly to the author and kept as archive.

Reviewer(s) responsibilities:

  1. Reviewer helps editor in making decisions on the submitted manuscript.
  2. Reviewer is responsible to give recommendation on reviewed manuscript.
  3. Review of manuscript is done objectively and supported by clear argument.
  4. Reviewer maintain secrecy of information for personal gain and incline to the double-blind review process.

Publisher responsibilities:

  1. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura as scientific journal publisher is responsible to publish article after the process of screening, review, editing, and layouts in accordance with the rules of standard scientific journal publishing.
  2. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura is responsible to guarantee academic freedom of editor and reviewer in running their job.
  3. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura responsible to keep privacy and protects intellectual property and copyright as well as editorial freedom.