Developing Sociodrama-Based Islamic Education and Character Education Learning Module for Junior High School Students

Fakhri Yacob; Liza Safira  Mardhatillah

doi:10.22373/jie.v8i2.35006

Authors

Fakhri Yacob Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Liza Safira Mardhatillah Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/jie.v8i2.35006

Keywords:

Social Ability, Internalization of Values, Sociodrama, Module Development, Learning Achievements

Abstract

This study was motivated by the limited emotional and social engagement of students in Islamic Education and Character Education (PAI-BP) learning, which often results in learning experiences that are less active, communicative, and meaningful. This study aimed to develop a sociodrama-based PAI-BP learning module for Grade VIII junior secondary school students in Banda Aceh. The sociodrama approach was selected because it allows students to engage with religious and moral values through structured role-playing, social interaction, reflection, and contextual learning activities. The novelty of this study lies in the systematic development of a sociodrama-based PAI-BP module that is contextualized within the Islamic educational environment of Banda Aceh and designed to support active learning and character-oriented instruction. This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) method using the ADDIE model, which consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The development process involved expert validation, practitioner-based practicality testing, and effectiveness testing. The research instruments consisted of expert validation sheets, practitioner response questionnaires, and learning outcome tests administered through pretests and posttests. The data were analyzed using percentage scores to assess validity and practicality, and the N-Gain formula to measure effectiveness. The results show that the sociodrama-based learning module has very high quality. The validity score increased from 89.68% in the first validation stage to 94.51% in the second validation stage, both categorized as highly valid. The practicality test obtained a score of 96.25%, categorized as highly practical, while the effectiveness test showed an N-Gain score of 0.83, categorized as high. These findings indicate that the module is valid, practical, and effective in improving students’ learning outcomes. In addition, its structured sociodrama activities have pedagogical potential to support students’ social interaction, interpersonal communication, empathy, and internalization of religious moral values. Therefore, the module is feasible for use as an innovative instructional material in PAI-BP learning at the junior secondary school level.

References

Akbar, Sa’dun. Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2015).

Anggraini, W., Charles, C., & Islami, M. H. (2025). Dimensions of Islamic Education in Shaping Students’ Character for 21st-Century Learning. International Journal of Islamic Thinking and Education. Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025), p. 82-88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69637/ijiting.v2i2

Azizah, N., & Jatiningsih, O. (2024). Penerapan metode sosiodrama dalam penguatan sikap peduli sosial dan toleransi beragama siswa SMA Labschool UNESA. Kajian Moral dan Kewarganegaraan, 12(1), p. 16-26 https://doi.org/10.26740/kmkn.v12n1

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Instrumen Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran. (Jakarta: BSNP, 2014).

Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory. (Prentice Hall, 1977).

Benny A. Pribadi, Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran (Jakarta: Dian Rakyat, 2017).

Borg, Walter R. & Gall, Meredith D. Educational Research: An Introduction, 4Th Ed. USA: Allyn and Bacon, 1983.

Branch, Robert Maribe. Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach (New York: Springer, 2009).

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Desmita, Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017).

Dick, Walter., Lou Carey, & James O. Carey. The Systematic Design of Instruction (8th ed.). (USA: Pearson, 2015).

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri dan Aswan Zain, Strategi Belajar Mengajar (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2018).

Fahma, N. Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Agama Islam pada Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Syiar Kegiatan Islam (SKI) dalam Menumbuhkan Karakter Islami. Mamba'ul 'Ulum, 19(2), (2023), p. 177–189.

Fauzi, A. G. Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Toleransi Melalui Pendidikan Agama Islam. TANZHIMUNA: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), (2022), p. 146–155.

Gall, Meredith D., Gall, Joyce P., and Borg, Walter R. Educational Research: An Introduction, 7th ed. (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2003).

Hake, Richard R“Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional Methods,” American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 1998): 65-78

Kolb, David A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1984).

Majid, Abdul. Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Kompetensi (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014).

Marzuki. “Pendidikan Karakter dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah.” Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 10 (2), 2020), p.140–152.

Mulyatiningsih, Endang. Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016).

Mutiya, A., Anwar, Z., & Ni'matuzahroh. Sosiodrama untuk meningkatkan kecerdasan moral pada siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Cognicia, 7(3), 2019, p. 350–364. https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v7i3.9221.

Nadiyah Aldoobie, “ADDIE Model,” American International Journal of Contemporary Research 5, no. 6 (2015): 68–72; Ahmed M. Almelhi, “Effectiveness of the ADDIE Model within an E-Learning Environment in Developing Creative Writing in EFL Students,” English Language Teaching, 14 (2), 2021, p. 20–36.

Nieveen, N. Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In J. van den Akker et al. (Eds.), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999).

Nurhayati, “Penggunaan Metode Sosiodrama dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam,” Jurnal Edukasi Islam. 8 (1), 2021) p, 67-73

Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research: An Introduction. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).

Prastowo, Andi. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif (Yogyakarta: Diva Press, 2015).

Prastowo, Andi. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. (Yogyakarta: Diva Press, 2015).

Pribadi, Benny A. Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. (Jakarta: Dian Rakyat, 2017).

Rita C. Richey and James D. Klein, Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues (New York: Routledge, 2014); Timothy J. Ellis and Yair Levy, Framework of Problem-Based Research: A Guide for Novice Researchers on the Development of a Research-Worthy Problem (Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press, 2019)

Sanjaya, Wina. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2016).

Sudjana, Nana. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017).

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D). (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019).

Thiagarajan, Sivasailam, Dorothy S. Semmel, dan Melvyn I. Semmel. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. (Minnesota: Indiana University, 1974).

Tomlinson, Brian. Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). (Cambridge University Press, 2011).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Vygotsky, Lev. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978).