Exploring curriculum approaches and issues: A descriptive analysis

Habiburrahim Habiburrahim

Abstract


A curriculum is a guideline used to achieve an educational goal, in which a curriculum contains at least four important elements: objectives, materials, methods, and evaluation. This descriptive study aims to describe several types of methods or approaches that are often used in teaching and learning activities. In addition, this paper also describes issues related to curriculum changes and the factors that influence such changes as well as the challenges faced in each curriculum change. The paper firstly elaborates the disciplinary curriculum approach in which it highlights the ideas of exploring a particular discipline science from single-focused lenses relating to such the science without linking it with other connected sciences. After exploring the disciplinary curriculum approach, the paper provides significant information on multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary curriculum approaches that have great potential in enhancing students’ critical thinking skills. This study is ended by exploring issues of curriculum changes and their driving factors, and challenges of curriculum changes.               


Keywords


Curriculum development; Curriculum approach; Curriculum changes; Higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, D. (2009). Productivism and ecologism: Changing dis/courses in TVET. In F. John, M. Rupert & P. Man-Gon (Eds.), Work, learning and sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges. Dordrecht: Springer

Arnold, G., & Civian, J. T. (1997). The ecology of general education reform. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 29(4), 18-23. doi: 10.1080/00091389709602323

Barnett, R., Parry, G., & Coate, K. (2001). Conceptualising curriculum change. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 435-449

Beberman-Shalev, L., Sabbagh, C., Resh, N., & Kramarski, B. (2011). Grading styles and disciplinary expertise: The mediating role of the teacher's perception of the subject matter. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 831-840. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.007

Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines Milton Keynes, United Kingdom The society for research into higher education and open university press.

Burgess, H. (2004). Redesigning the curriculum for social work education: Complexity, conformity, chaos, creativity, collaboration? Social Work Education: The International Journal, 23(2), 163-183.

Charlton, B. (2006). Science as a general education: Conceptual science should constitute the compulsory core of multi-disciplinary undergraduate degrees. Medical Hypotheses, 66, 451-453. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.12.005

Chettiparamb, A. (2007). Interdisciplinarity: A literature review. The interdisciplinary teaching and learning group, The higher education academy, retieved from www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/sustainability/interdisciplinarity_literature_review.pdf

Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective California: University of California Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teaching and educational transformation. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change. New York: Springer.

Davies, M., & Devlin, M. (2007). Interdisciplinary higher education: Implications for teaching and learning, retrieved from cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/curriculum_design/docs/interdisciplinaryHED.pdf

Down, C., Martin, E., Hager, P., & Bricknell, L. (1999). Graduate attributes, key competence and judgments: Exploring the links. Paper presented at the Cornerstones of Higher Education: HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne

Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for supervision and curriculum development

Dressel, P. L., & Marcus, D. (1982). On teaching and learning in college: Reemphasizing the roles of learners and the disciplines (1st ed.). San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers college press.

Gibbs, G. (2012). Implications of 'Dimensions of quality' in a market environment. York, England: The Higher Education Academy.

Golding, C. (2009). Integrating the disciplines: Successful interdisciplinary subjects, retrieved from www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/curriculum_design/docs/Interdisc_Guide.pdf

Gruba, P., Moffat, A., Sondergaard, H., & Zobel, J. (2004). What drives curriculum change? Paper presented at the Sixth Australasian conference on computing education, Australia.

Hammer, M., & Soderqvist, T. (2001). Enhancing transdisciplinary dialogue in curricula development. Ecological economics, 38, 1-5.

Harpe, B. D. L., & Thomas, I. (2009). Curriculum change in universities: Conditions that facilitate education for sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 75-85. doi: 10.1177/097340820900300115

Henkel, M. (1999). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Hess, F. M. (2010). A market for knowledge? In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change. New York: Springer.

Jacobs, H. H. (1998). The Growing Need for Interdisciplinary Curriculum Content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Karseth, B. (2004). Curriculum changes and moral issues in nursing education. Nurse education today(24), 638-643. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.08.003

Klein, G. (2002). It takes more than a passport: Interdisciplinarity in study abroad. In C. Haynes (Ed.), Innovation in interdisciplinary teaching. Westport, Connecticut Oryx press

Klein, M. F. (1990). Approaches to curriculum theory and practice. In J. T. Sears & J. D. Marshall (Eds.), Teaching and thinking about curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

Knight, P., & Yorke, M. (2004). Learning, curriculum and employability in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Ladwig, J. G. (2010). Curriculum and teacher change International Encyclopedia of Education 374-378.

Lattuca, L. R. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural perspectives on academic work The journal of higher education, 73(6), 711-739.

Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.

Mansila, V. B., & Gardner, H. (2003). Assessing interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical exploration of "symptoms of quality", retrieved from www.old-pz.gse.harvard.edu/interdisciplinary/pdf/VBM-Garner_AssessingSymptoms_2003.pdf

Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in integrative studies, 19, 1-25.

Newhouse, R. P., & Spring, B. (2010). Interdisciplinary evidence-based practice: Moving from silos to synergy. Nursing Outlook, 58(6), 309-317. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.09.001

Oliver, S. L., & Hyun, E. (2011). Comprehensive curriculum reform in higher education: Collaborative engagement of faculty and administrators. Journal of Case Studies in Education, 1-20.

Orrell, J., & Higgs, J. (2012). Social and political change: Implications for professional and practice-based university education. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billet, M. Hutchings & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers

Qun, G., & Wanjin, M. (2007). China's new national curriculum reform: Innovation, challenges and strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(4), 579-604.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Tchudi, S., & Lafer, S. (1996). The Interdisciplinary Teacher's Handbook: Integrated Teaching Across the Curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.

Tran, L. T. (2013). Internationalisation of vocational education and training: An adapting curve for teachers and learners. Journal of studies in international education, 17(4), 492-507. doi: 10.1177/1028315312469987

Turner, S. (2000). What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different? . In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity Canada: University of Toronto press.

Valles, M. C. (2012). Integrated skills: An approach for strengthening the technical and vocational education program (STVEP) in the Philippines OECD local economic and employment development (LEED) working papers (12), 71-76, retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1352129909?accountid=10910

Wormley, D. N. (2004). Challenges in curriculum renewal International Journal Engagement Education, 20(3), 329-332.

Zembylas, M. (2010). Teacher emotions in the context of educational reforms. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkin (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change New York: Springer.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10829

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This journal has been viewedtimes.
View full page view stats report here.


All works are licensed under CC-BY

Englisia Journal
© Author(s) 2019.
Published by Center for Research and Publication UIN Ar-Raniry and Department of English Language Education UIN Ar-Raniry.

Indexed by: