EFL learners' difficulties in the structure and written expression section of TOEFL test in an Indonesian university

Saiful Akmal, Muhammad Nur Akbar Rasyid, Yuliar Masna, Cut Natasha Soraya

Abstract


This study examined the English for Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ difficult topics in the structure and written expression section of the TOEFL Prediction Test, and reasons why they consider that these topics were difficult. A mixed-method research design was used in this study. Fifteen participants were selected through a purposive sampling mechanism from the seventh-semester students of the Department of English Language Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry who have participated in the TOEFL Prediction Test to identify the difficult topics they encountered. Then, the semi-structured interviews were conducted with six underachieving student’s participants with the most recorded errors made in the test to know the reasons behind their difficulties. Findings indicated that students encountered difficulties mostly when dealing with determiners, conjunctions, adjective clauses, apposition phrases, and reduced clauses in the structure section. Meanwhile, adverb connectors, subject-verb agreement, and clause of concession, relative clause, and quantifier are the difficulties they encountered in the written expression section of the test. Thus, the findings also revealed several factors identified as the reasons behind those difficulties, namely lack of practice, grammar incompetence, vocabulary shortage, time management, and low self-confidence. Given the significant impact of this study, we suggested that the lectures and English departments should address these difficulties. It is crucial that the focus of the courses related to grammar and EFL proficiency tests be incorporated into the syllabus.


Keywords


EFL learners; structure; written expression; TOEFL Test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abboud, Z. A. R., & Hussein, N. J. (2011). The difficulties faced by advanced Iraqi foreign learners in passing the ITP TOEFL test. Journal of Basrah Wes (Humanities Series), 36(4), 110-138.

Adhabi, E., & Christina, B.A. (2017). Literature review for the type of interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 86-97.

Ahmed, A. H. (2010). Students' problems with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay writing in Egypt: Different perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ)1(4), 211-221.

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21-34.

Alrabai, F. (2016). Factors underlying low achievement of Saudi EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics6(3), 21-37.

Alshammari, H. A. M. (2013). Effects of time constraint on second language reading comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University Carbondale).

Ananda, R. (2016). Problems with section two ITP TOEFL test. Studies in English Language and Education, 3(1), 35-49.

Annabel, B. K. (2005). Using interviews as research instruments. Chulalongkorn University: Language Institute.

Atmojo, A. E. P. (2018). Students' problems on SV agreement in TOEFL and their proposed solutions. Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra3(2), 169-175.

Aziz, A. L. (2016). The implementation of minimum TOEFL score-obtaining as a graduation requirement in higher education: students' perspective. International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences4(3), 76-87.

Baker, W. (2012). English as a lingua franca in Thailand: Characterisations and implications. Englishes in Practice1(1), 18-27.

Baker, W. (2012). Global cultures and identities: Refocusing the aims of ELT in Asia through intercultural awareness. In Innovating EFL teaching in Asia (pp. 23-34). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in language program: A comprehensive guide to testing language assessment. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (Eds.). (2011). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign LanguageTM. Routledge.

Chujo, K., Oghigian, K., & Akasegawa, S. (2015). A corpus and grammatical browsing system for remedial EFL learners. Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning, 109-130.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Dang, T. K. A., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Le, T. T. T. (2013). The impacts of globalisation

on EFL teacher education through English as a medium of instruction: An example from Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning14(1), 52-72.

Darweesh, A. D., & Kadhim, S. A. H. (2016). Iraqi EFL learners' problems in using conjunctions as cohesive devices. Journal of Education and Practice7(11), 169-180.

Dehham, S. H. (2014). The performance of Iraqi EFL university learners in using English compound adjectives. Journal of University of Babylon22(2), 349-372.

Devira, M., & Makhroji, M. (2017). The EFL university students' problems in

answering the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL): A study in Indonesian context. In International Conference on Science, Technology and Modern Society (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 93-97).

Ebadi, S., & Khaksar, Z. (2014). The relationship between Iranian upper intermediate EFL learner's test anxiety level and their performance in writing test of TOEFL. IJLLALW20146(4), 293-307.

Erfani, S. S. (2012). A Comparative washback study of IELTS and TOEFL iBT on teaching and learning activities in preparation courses in the Iranian context. English Language Teaching5(8), 185-195.

Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. E8

Farrokhi, F., & Sattarpour, S. (2012). The effects of direct written corrective feedback on improvement of grammatical accuracy of high-proficient L2 learners. World Journal of Education2(2), 49-57.

Fitri, M. (2018). The difficulties faced by the students in answering the written expression section of The TOEFL Test. Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching3(2).

Gray, D.E. (20014). Doing research in the real world. First Edition. London: Sage Publications.

Griffe, D. T. (2012). An introduction to second language research methods: Design and data. TESL-EJ Publications. Berkeley, California, USA.

Guetterman, T. C. (2015). The development, design, and test of a self-assessment instrument of mixed methods research proficiency. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Hajri, T., Jufrizal., & Wahyuni, D. (2018). An analysis of difficulties in answering structure and written expression of TOEFL made by English students' of universitas negeri padang. Journal of English Langauge Teaching, 7(1), 93-105.

Hambali, M. (2008). Shortcut strategies in analyzing sentence structure in TOEFL. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(2), 82-88.

Hamid, M. O., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2016). Foreign language policies in Asia and Australia in the Asian century. Language Problems and Language Planning40(1), 26-46.

Hamid, M. O., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2016). Globalization, English language policy,

and teacher agency: Focus on Asia. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives15(1), 26-43.

Hayes, D. (2017). Fallacies affecting policy and practice in the teaching of English as aforeign language in state primary schools in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(2), 179-192.

Herwandar, R., Safryono, D. A., & Haryono, P. Y. (2012). Evaluasi program matrikulasi TOEFL mahasiswa Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia 2010/2011. Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humaniora1(3), 179-188.

Hosseiny, M. (2014). The role of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL students' writing skill. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences98(1), 668-674.

Huang, J. (2006). English abilities for academic listening: How confident are Chinese students? College Student Journal. 40(1), 218-226.

Kasim, U. (2016, November). The implementation of TOEFL score as a requirement for script examination at Syiah Kuala University. In Proceedings of English Education International Conference (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 24-28).

Kawachi-Furlan, C. J., Amorim, G. B., & Finardi, K. R. (2017). The interface between the TOEFL ITP and internationalization and language assessment in Brazil. Interface5(2).

Kempa, R. (1991). Students learning difficulties in science: Causes and possible remedial. Ensenanza de Las Cienciai, 9(2), 119-128.

Mahmud, M. (2014). The EFL students' problem in answering the test of English as a foreign language (TOEFL): A study in Indonesian context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(12), 2581-2587.

Martono, E. (2013). The Effectiveness of Communicative Language Teaching method to enhance the students' motivation in increasing their TOEFL score. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature7(2).

Masfufah, S. (2018). Indonesian college students' perceptions of TOEFL preparation class. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture3(1), 66-78.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (3rd ed.). London.

Netta, A., & Trisnawati, I. K. (2020). Acehnese undergraduate students' strategies in preparing For TOEFL prediction: A preliminary study. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities7(1), 41-52.

Nikolaieva, O. (2016). A qualitative study on preparing EFL students to take the TOEFL internet-based (iBT) test in the Ukrainian context (Master's thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway).

Nikolov, M. (2016). Trends, issues, and challenges in assessing young language learners. In Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 1-17). Springer, Cham.

Nimasari, E. P., Mufanti, R., & Gestanti, R. A. (2019). SEKOLAH TOEFL as a platform to integrate technology and online learning resources in ELT. Asian EFL Journal23(3.2).

Noviyenty, L. (2018). An evaluation of TOEFL matriculation program for STAIN students. English and Literature Journal5(1), 55-68.

Philips, D. (2001). Longman introductory course for the TOEFL test (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Saadian, H., & Bagheri, M. S. (2014). The relationship between grammar and vocabulary knowledge and Iranian EFL learners' writing performance (TOEFL PBT essay). International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World7(1), 108-123.

Samad, I.A. & Fitriani, S.S. (2016). English proficiency in facing ASEAN economic community: an opportunity or a challenge?. Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference Syiah Kuala University (AIC Unsyiah) in conjunction with the 12th International Conference on Mathematics, Statistics and Its Application (ICMSH), October 4-6, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.

Samad, I. A., Jannah, M., & Fitriani, S. S. (2017). EFL Students' strategies dealing with common difficulties in TOEFL reading comprehension section. International Journal of Language Education1(1).

Seyedtajaddini, K. (2014). The impact of audio input Enhancement on EFL learners'grammar learning from varying proficiency levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences98(18), 1706-1712.

Sharpe, P. J. (2004). How to prepare for the TOEFL: Test of English as a foreign. New York: Barron's Educational Series

Snape, N. (2006). The acquisition of the English determiner phrase by Japanese and Spanish learners of English (Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex).

Stuckey, H. L. (2013). Three types of interviews: Qualitative research methods in social

Students. English and Literature Journal5(1), 55-68.

Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. H. (2016). Explicit grammar instruction in communicative language teaching: A study of the use of quantifiers. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research9(1), 31.

Sudijono, A. (2006). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Susanti, N. W. M. (2014). The use of paper-based TOEFL as a gate keeper for graduation: A case study at English department Universitas Mataram. In The 61st TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 1169-1172).

Takanashi, Y. (2004). TEFL and communication styles in Japanese culture. Language, Culture and Curriculum. 17(1), 1-14.

Todd, R. W., & Shih, C. M. (2013). Assessing English in Southeast Asia. The Companion to Language Assessment4, 1681-1689.

Warfield, W., Laribee, R., & Geyer, R. W. (2013). Examining result and establishing benchmark data from the TOEFL ITP test. American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal, 5(3), 191-198.

Woods, A., Fletcher, P., & Hughes, A. (1986). Statistics in language studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wulandari, N. (2016). Barriers of teaching TOEFL in Indonesia. Lantip: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ekonomi Universitas Respati Yogyakarta6(1), 1-12.

Xu, W., Case, R. E., & Wang, Y. (2009). Pragmatic and grammatical competence, length of residence, and overall L2 proficiency. System37(2), 205-216.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ej.v7i2.6472

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This journal has been viewedtimes.
View full page view stats report here.


All works are licensed under CC-BY

Englisia Journal
© Author(s) 2019.
Published by Center for Research and Publication UIN Ar-Raniry and Department of English Language Education UIN Ar-Raniry.

Indexed by: