Behind the trend of Englishing the business names in Aceh, Indonesia: A postcolonial analysis

Jarjani Usman, Nurul Faridah, Mulia Mulia

Abstract


This study critically analyzes the recent trend of Englishing shop names in Aceh province. Borrowing Bhabha’s postcolonial theory, this study attempted to uncover the shop owners’ perceptions of privileging English and marginalizing local languages, even though their customers are mostly local. Data collection was by taking pictures and interviewing 20 owners of the shops, four females and 16 males. Results show that the 120 shop names in Banda Aceh and surrounding it are in English, modified English and Indonesian ordering, hybridized English and Indonesian ordering, hybridized English Acehnese language and English, English and English ordering, and mixed owner’s names and English ordering. They voluntarily mimicked the Western culture by using English names because they believe that English is marketable, modern, practical, flexible, familiar, and short for shop branding, while the local language looks not modern, unpractical, and weird. In conclusion, most shop owners in the two districts in Aceh negotiate the Western hegemony for the economic benefits.


Keywords


hybridity; mimicry; negotiation; postcolonial theory; shop names; resistance; Islamic sharia  

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2003). Post-colonial studies: Key concepts. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2007). Post-colonial studies: The key concepts (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Bati, U. (2007). The semiotics of advertisements: Reading advertisements as a sign systems. International Journal of Human Sciences, 4(1), 1-28.

Beasley, R., & Danesi, M. (2002). Persuasive signs: The semiotics of advertising. Mouton de Gruyter.

Bhabha, H. K. (1984). Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. Discipleship a Special Issue on Psychoanalysis, 28, 125-133.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.

Bigon, L., & Hart, T. (2017). Beneath the city’s grid: Vernacular and (post)colonial planning interactions in Dakar, Senegal. Journal of Historical Geography, 59, 52-67.

Burke, C. (2018). The future of higher education in Ireland: A postcolonial perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, DOI:10.1080/1360080X.2018.1502605

Chakrabarty, D. (1992). Postcoloniality and the artifice of history: Who speaks for ‘Indian pasts?, Representations, 37, 1-26.

Connel, L. (2003). Modes of marginality: Scottish literature and the uses of postcolonial theory. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 23(1-2), 41-53.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Craggs, R. (2018). Subaltern geopolitics and the post-colonial commonwealth. Journal of Political Geography, 65, 46-56.

Da-Silva, A. M. (2014). Upon the prevalence of English on billboard advertisements: Analyzing the role of English in Indonesian context. TEFLIN Journal, 25(1), 33-61.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

During, S. (2000). Postcolonialism and globalization: Towards a historicization of their inter-relation. Cultural Studies, 14(3-4), 385-404.

Dutta-Bergman, M., & Pal, M. (2005). The negotiation of U.S. advertising among Bengali immigrants: A journey in hybridity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29 (4), 317-335.

Emezue, G.M.T. (2004). Stylizing contemporary post-colonial african poetry: The rhetoric of boasts and curses. Journal of Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 100-106.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London Routledge.

Ghandeharion, A., & Badrlou, L. (2018). Iranian advertisements: A postcolonial semiotic reading. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 334-342.

Griffe, D. (2012). An introduction to second language research methods: Design and data. California: TESL-EJ publications.

Harrison, K., & Boyd, T. (2018). The role of ideology in politics and society. In Understanding political ideas and movements. Manchester University Press.

Hassall, T., Murtisari, E. T., Donnelly, C., & Wood, J. (2008). Attitudes to western loanwords in Indonesian. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2008(189). doi:10.1515/ijsl.2008.003

Huddart, D. (2005). Homi K. Bhabha. Psychology Press.

Hycner, R.H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human studies, 8, 279-303.

Kumar, M. (2000). Postcolonial theory and crossculturalism: Collaborative ‘signposts’ of discursive practices. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 1(2), 82-92.

Kumar, S. (2011). Bhabha's notion of 'mimicry' and 'ambivalence' in vs Naipaul's a bend in the river. Researchers World, 2(4), 118.

Kuswarini, P., Muhammad Hasyim, M., & Chotimah, I. N. (2020). Othering The Self as A Form of Mimicry in The English Translation of Hirata’s Laskar Pelangi. Journa Of Critical Reviews, 7(19), 1286-1295.

Lawlor, K. (1992). A semiotic reading of advertisements. PhD thesis. Dublin: Dublin City University.

Lukin, A. (2017). Ideology and the text-in-context relation. Functional Linguistics, 4(1), 16.

Malik, W.H., & Umrani, T. (2015). A post-colonial reading of Muneeza Shamsie’s that heathen air. International Journal of English and Education, 4(2), 398-408.

McFarlane-Alvarez, S. L. (2007). Trinidad and Tobago television advertising as third space: Hybridity as resistance in the Caribbean mediascape. Howard Journal of Communications, 18, 39-55.

Mohanty, C. (1991). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12(3), 333-358.

Mostafaee, J. (2016). Investigating identity, ambivalence, hybridity: A Bhabhaian reading of JM Coetzee’s Foe and Disgrace. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 163-167.

Movuh, M. C. Y. (2015). The colonial heritage and post-colonial influence, entanglements and implications of the concept of community forestry by the example of Cameroon. Journal of Forest Policy and Economics, 15, 70–77.

Nayar, P. K. (2015). The postcolonial studies dictionary. John Wiley & Sons.

Nduati, R. N. (2016). The post-colonial language and identity experiences of transnational Kenyan teachers in U.S. universities. Doctoral Dissertation. Syracuse University.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.

Parsons, J. B., & Harding, K. J. (2011). Post-colonial theory and action research. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(2), 1-6.

Poedjosoedarmo, G. (2006). The effect of Indonesian as a lingua franca on the Javanese system of speech levels and their functions. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 177, 111-121. DOI: 10.1515/IJSL.2006.007

Racine, L., & Petrucka, P. (2011). Enhancing decolonization and knowledge transfer in nursing research with non-western populations: Examining the congruence between primary healthcare and postcolonial feminist approaches. Journal of Nursing Inquiry, 18(1), 12-20.

Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism. In Y. Wang (Eds). The cultural factors in postcolonial theories and applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 650-654.

Singh, A. (2009). Mimicry and hybridity in plain English. Retrieved January, 27, 2019. From:http://www.lehigh.edu//.

Singh, A. (2010). More than “priestly mumbo‐jumbo”: Religion and authorship in All About H. Hatterr. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 46(1), 89-100.

Singh, A. (2016). Postcolonial Studies. The Encyclopedia of Postcolonial Studies, 1-7.

Spivak, G. (1990). Poststructuralism, marginality, postcoloniality and value. In M. Kumar (Eds.). Postcolonial theory and crossculturalism: Collaborative ‘signposts’ of discursive practices (pp. 82-92). Cornel University.

Sunarto, S., Sejati, I. R. H., & Utomo, U. (2020). Mimicry and hybridity of “Congrock Musik 17” in Semarang. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, 20(1), 29-38.

Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: A user friendly guide (2nd Ed.). Routledge.

Varman, R., Cayla, J., & Hari, S. (2011). Mimicry and postcolonial advertising. European Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 544.

Viruru, R. (2005). The impact of postcolonial theory on early childhood education. Journal of Education, 35(1), 7-30.

Vološinov, V. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Seminar Press.

Wang, Y. (2018). The cultural factors in postcolonial theories and applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 650-654.

Warren, C.A.B., & Karner, T.X. (2015). Discovering qualitative methods: Ethnography, interviews, documents, and images (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.

Wu, X., & Tarc, P. (2016). Translations and paradoxes of ‘Western’pedagogy: perspectives of English language teachers in a Chinese college. L2 Journal, 8(4).

Young, R. J.C. (2016). Postcolonialism: An historical Introduction (15th Anniversary Ed). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ej.v8i2.8908

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This journal has been viewedtimes.
View full page view stats report here.


All works are licensed under CC-BY

Englisia Journal
© Author(s) 2019.
Published by Center for Research and Publication UIN Ar-Raniry and Department of English Language Education UIN Ar-Raniry.

Indexed by: