Penyelesaian Khalwat dan Qanun Gampong: Studi Kasus di Gampong Meunasah Moncut Aceh Besar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/jpi.v2i2.15339Keywords:
khalwat, Qanun Gampong, Aceh BesarAbstract
Communities in Gampong Meunasah Moncut are required to enforce Islamic law, but its implementation has resulted in various violations or anarchic actions that are not in accordance with Islamic values and have had an impact on social clashes in society. Under these conditions, village qanuns are considered an alternative to preventing and resolving these violations. The purpose of this research is to identify violations in resolving khalwat and identify the needs and desires of the community in compiling a gampong qanun that is able to prevent these violations from occurring. The research method uses a qualitative approach, and data collection methods include interviews, observation, and documentation. The results of the study showed that there were violations in the form of taking the law into their own hands by the people in Gampong Meunasah Moncut Aceh Besar against people who were accused of committing khalwat and that there was a need for gampong qanuns to prevent criminal violations committed by the community in resolving khalwat cases. Gampong Qanun is regarded as an alternative in preventing and resolving various social problems in the Gampong Meunasah Moncut Aceh Besar community.
Abstrak
Masyarakat di Gampong Meunasah Moncut dihadapkan pada tanggung jawab menegakkan syariat Islam, namun rasa tanggung jawab ini justru direalisasikan pada berbagai pelanggaran-pelanggaran atau tindakan anarkis yang tidak sesuai dengan nilai-nilai keislaman yang berdampak pada benturan-benturan sosial pada masyarakat. Pada kondisi tersebut qanun gampong dianggap sebagai salah satu alternatif pencegahan dan penyelesaian pelanggaran tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi pelanggaran dalam menyelesaikan khalwat dan mengidentitas kebutuhan dan keinginan masyarakat dalam penyusunan suatu qanun gampong yang mampu mencegah terjadinya pelanggaran tersebut. Metode penelitian dengan pendekatan kualitatif, dan metode pengumpulan data dengan wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Hasil Penelitian, bahwa terjadinya pelanggaran berupa main hakim sendiri oleh masyarakat di Gampong Meunasah Moncut Aceh Besar terhadap masyarakat yang dituduh melakukan khalwat dan adanya kebutuhan qanun gampong dalam mencegah pelanggaran-pelanggaran pidana yang dilakukan masyarakat dalam menyelesaikan kasus khalwat. Qanun Gampong dianggap sebagai Alternatif dalam mencegah dan menyelesaikan berbagai persoalan-persoalan sosial kemasyarakatan di Gampong Meunasah Moncut Aceh Besar.
Downloads
References
Ahyar, A. (2017). Aspek Hukum Pelaksanaan Qanun Jinayat Di Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.v17.131-154
Badruzzaman, A. (2012). Pedoman Peradilan Adat di Aceh. UNDP.
Basrowi dan Suwandi. (2008). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Rineka Cipta.
Fitriani, R., & Mansur, T. M. (2020). PENYELESAIAN KASUS KHALWAT MELALUI HUKUM ADAT DI KECAMA-TAN BEBESEN KABUPATEN ACEH TENGAH. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum …, Vol 4, No. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/perdata/article/view/17167
Kompas. (2017). Diduga Mesum, Seorang Pemuda Tewas Dikeroyok Warga di Aceh Timur. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2017/07/20/17370541/diduga-mesum-seorang-pemuda-tewas-dikeroyok-warga-di-aceh-timur
Mizaj Iskandar, E. E. (2000). Otoritas Lembaga Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Khalwat di Aceh. Dinas Syari’at Islam Aceh.
Muntazar, Sarong, H. A., & Din, M. (2017). Penyelesaian Kasus Khalwat Melalui Peradilan Adat Aceh Complete Case of the Khalwat (Adultery) Through Aceh Administration. Media Syariah, 19(1), 159. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jms.v19i1.2019
Muthalib, S. A., Masrizal, Abdullah, I., Yusuf, M., & Melayu, H. A. (2022). Public Services for Non-Muslims in Aceh: Non-Muslim Rights in The Application of Islamic Sharia Law. Res Militaris, 12(2), 85–101. https://resmilitaris.net/menu-script/index.php/resmilitaris/article/view/81
Nasyiah, T., & Mansur, T. M. (2019). Denda Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Khalwat di Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan, 3(1), 86–96. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/perdata/article/view/14976
Rahmatillah, S., & Bustamam, A. (2021). Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri (Eigenrichting) Terhadap Pelaku Khalwat Sebagai Dalih Kebiasaan Masyarakat Di Aceh. Tazkir : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Keislaman, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24952/tazkir.v7i1.4182
Shadiqin, S. I., & Srimulyani, E. (2022). THE CONTESTED AUTHORITIES: Institution and Agency in the Enforcement of Sharia Law in Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies, 5(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v5i2.10601
Sugiono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif dan Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Wahid, A., Yahya, A., Shomad, B. A., Yunus, F. M., & Syarifuddin. (2022). The Perspective Of Ulama Dayah On The Hadith About Procedures Of Friday Prayer In Aceh. Webology, 19(2), 5577–5594. http://www.webology.org/abstract.php?id=2016
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Jurnal Pemikiran Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)











