Efficiency of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Indonesia during COVID-19: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted global financial systems, with the banking sector facing mounting pressures on operational efficiency and financial stability. In Indonesia, this crisis presented a critical test for both Conventional Banks (CBs) and Islamic Banks (IBs), whose structural and operational models differ significantly. This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficiency levels of CBs and IBs during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022) using a quantitative approach. The Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) with a Cobb-Douglas production function was employed to measure cost efficiency, while an independent samples t-test was used to determine the statistical significance of efficiency differences between bank types. A purposive sample consisting of 39 CBs and 9 IBs was analyzed based on input variables (fixed assets, deposits, and personnel costs) and output (total financing). The results reveal that CBs achieved higher efficiency scores (average = 89.39) compared to IBs (average = 82.27), with the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001). Efficiency among CBs remained relatively stable, while IBs showed more variability and consistent decline over the period. The study identifies key contributing factors to IBs' lower efficiency, including technological constraints, lack of product standardization, and regulatory complexities. These findings underscore the need for structural reforms in the Islamic banking sector, particularly in technology adoption and regulatory harmonization. The study offers valuable insights for regulators, bank managers, and policymakers in enhancing the resilience and competitiveness of Indonesia’s dual banking system during periods of financial stress.
========================================================================================================
ABSTRAK - Efisiensi Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional di Indonesia Selama Pandemi COVID-19: Analisis Frontier Stokastik. Pandemi COVID-19 telah mengguncang sistem keuangan global, termasuk sektor perbankan yang menghadapi tekanan besar terhadap efisiensi operasional dan stabilitas keuangan. Di Indonesia, krisis ini menjadi Pelajaran berharga bagi Bank Konvensional (CBs) dan Bank Syariah (IBs) yang memiliki perbedaan struktural dan operasional yang signifikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dan membandingkan tingkat efisiensi CBs dan IBs selama pandemi COVID-19 (2020–2022) melalui pendekatan kuantitatif. Metode yang digunakan adalah Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) dengan fungsi produksi Cobb-Douglas untuk mengukur efisiensi biaya, serta uji t independen untuk mengetahui signifikansi perbedaan efisiensi antara kedua jenis bank. Sampel purposif terdiri dari 39 CBs dan 9 IBs, dianalisis berdasarkan variabel input (aset tetap, dana pihak ketiga, dan biaya SDM) serta output (total pembiayaan). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa CBs memiliki skor efisiensi lebih tinggi (rata-rata = 89,39) dibandingkan IBs (rata-rata = 82,27), dengan perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik (p < 0,001). Efisiensi CBs cenderung stabil, sementara IBs menunjukkan penurunan konsisten dan variasi yang lebih besar. Faktor-faktor yang berkontribusi terhadap rendahnya efisiensi IBs mencakup keterbatasan teknologi, kurangnya standardisasi produk, dan kompleksitas regulasi. Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya reformasi struktural dalam sektor perbankan syariah, khususnya dalam adopsi teknologi dan harmonisasi regulasi. Studi ini memberikan wawasan penting bagi regulator, manajemen bank, dan pembuat kebijakan dalam meningkatkan daya tahan dan daya saing sistem perbankan ganda di Indonesia pada masa krisis keuangan.
Keywords
Full Text:
DOWNLOAD PDFReferences
Abdul-Majid, M., Falahaty, M., & Jusoh, M. (2017). Performance of Islamic and conventional banks: A meta-frontier approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.069
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Ali, A., Bashir, M. F., & Afridi, M. (2021). Do Islamic banks perform better than conventional banks? Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26414/A082
Ali, Q., Akhtar, M. F., & Sadaqat, S. (2021). Performance analysis of Islamic and conventional banks in Pakistan: A comparative study. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 9(2), 15–26.
Aulia, R., Ibrahim, A., & Tarigan, I. R. R. (2020). Operasionalisasi Lembaga Keuangan Baru Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Pertumbuhan Usaha Mikro. JIHBIZ: Global Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 2(1), 57-81.
Azhari, A. R., & Wahyudi, R. (2020). Analisis kinerja perbankan syariah di Indonesia: Studi masa pandemi Covid-19 [Analysis of Islamic banking performance in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia, 10(2), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.21927/jesi.2020.10(2).96-102
Bauer, P. W., Berger, A. N., Ferrier, G. D., & Humphrey, D. B. (1998). Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: A comparison of frontier efficiency methods. Journal of Economics and Business, 50(2), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(97)00072-6
Beck, T., Degryse, H., De Hass, R., & Van Horen, N. (2014). When arm’s length is too far: Relationship banking over the business cycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 1–25.
Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00342-6
Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7), 895–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00010-1
Bidari, D. R., Hartono, D., & Sari, D. (2020). Bank employees in the era of COVID-19: Job security and operational risks. Indonesian Journal of Employment Studies, 8(1), 45–58.
Bitar, M., Hassan, M. K., & Walker, T. (2019). Political systems and the financial soundness of Islamic banks. Journal of Financial Stability, 44, 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2019.100695
Brown, K., & Skully, M. (2003). Banking efficiency in ASEAN: A frontier approach. In M. Balling, E. Gnan, & F. Lierman (Eds.), Financial Services in the EU: Banking, Securities and Post-Trading (pp. 273–294). Routledge.
Hadad, M. D., Hall, M. J. B., Kenjegalieva, K., Santoso, W., & Simper, R. (2003). Efficiency in Indonesian banking: Recent evidence (Loughborough University Economics Research Paper No. 03/17). Loughborough University. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/18973
Hamdani, R., Hasibuan, M. S., & Rachmawati, F. (2018). Factors affecting public trust in banking institutions. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis, 9(2), 101–110.
Hartono, D. (2009). Efficiency analysis of banking sectors in Indonesia: A study of conventional and Islamic banks. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 57(4), 320–335.
Hassan, M. K. (2003). Cost, profit and X-efficiency of Islamic banks in Malaysia. In M. Iqbal & D. T. Llewellyn (Eds.), Islamic Banking and Finance: New Perspectives on Profit Sharing and Risk (pp. 49–67). Edward Elgar.
Ibrahim, A., & Rosniar, R. (2024). Does intellectual capital efficiency translate into financial performance for Islamic banks in Indonesia? Evidence from the pre-pandemic period. Qeios, 6. https://doi.org/10.32388/CHBTCM.2.
Ismail, A. G. (2015). Money, Islamic banks and the real economy. Cengage Learning Asia.
Johnes, J., Izzeldin, M., & Pappas, V. (2014). A comparison of performance of Islamic and conventional banks 2004–2009. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, S93–S107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.07.016
Kumbhakar, S. C., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Kyshakevych, O., & Mazharov, O. (2018). Evaluation of efficiency in the banking sector: Methods and challenges. Banking and Finance Review, 5(3), 12–23.
Parsa, A. (2020). The impact of technology adoption on the efficiency of Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(5), 1003–1021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2018-0216
Pellegrina, L. D. (2012). Capital structure and efficiency in banking: A comparison between Islamic and conventional banks. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 8(1), 34–47.
Pratomo, D., & Ramdani, L. (2021). COVID-19 and the cost efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 7(1), 145–162.
Sa’diyah, C. (2021). Financial efficiency as a resilience indicator in Islamic banking. Jurnal Keuangan Syariah, 5(1), 56–67.
Safiullah, M., & Shamsuddin, A. (2022). Meta-frontier analysis of Islamic and conventional banks: Evidence from the GCC region. Economic Modelling, 111, 105817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105817
Sukmaningrum, P. S., & Pohan, H. A. (2016). Comparative efficiency between Islamic and conventional banks during financial crisis in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 4(2), 105–114.
Wahyudi, I. (2020). Risk exposure and bank performance during COVID-19. Jurnal Manajemen Perbankan, 9(2), 77–84.
Wardhani, N. K., & Mongid, A. (2019). The inefficiency of Indonesian banks: An input–output approach. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 3(1), 1–14.
Zuhroh, I., Yudistianto, B., & Ashar, K. (2015). Efficiency of Islamic banking in Indonesia: A stochastic frontier approach. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 13(7), 5565–5584.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/share.v14i1.26469
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dini Dewindaru, Ermina Sari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.