Artikel

Default Cover for IMPLEMENTATION OF 3D SOFTWARE TOWARDS REPRESENTATION MICROSCOPIC AND SPATIAL INTELLIGENCE OF PROSPECTIVE BIOLOGY TEACHERS
Volume 9, Issue 1 (2021)
IMPLEMENTATION OF 3D SOFTWARE TOWARDS REPRESENTATION MICROSCOPIC AND SPATIAL INTELLIGENCE OF PROSPECTIVE BIOLOGY TEACHERS
Affiliation Details
  • Diki Muhamad Chaidir: Biology Education Department, Universitas Siliwangi
  • Purwati Kuswarini Suprapto: Biology Education Department, Universitas Siliwangi
, Pages: 15-23 , DOI: 10.22373/biotik.v9i1.7758

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out the differences in spatial intelligence and microscopic representation of prospective biology teachers in 3D software lectures on plant anatomy using Blender and 3DS Max applications. The research method used was quasi-experimental using the research design of The Matching Only Pretest-Posttest group design group. The population in this study is a prospective biology teacher in the department of biology education faculty of teaching and educational sciences in the academic year 2017/2018 at Siliwangi University who contracted the course of plant anatomy. Sampling is done by purposive sampling techniques as many as 2 classes by looking at the level of activeness in the same learning process. The results showed both classes showed a low spatial intelligence N-Gain category, as well as getting an average value of microscopic representation with a score of 3.7 for the use of 3Ds Max and 3.82 for Blender. The conclusion of this study is that there is no difference in spatial intelligence and microscopic representation of students, in addition students are still having difficulty for those who use max 3Ds software, because it requires a high enough computer specification, so the use of 3-dimensional blender application is more recommended used for aspiring biology teachers who want to make 3D forms of biological objects especially plant anatomy.

2

TOTAL VIEWS

1

DOWNLOADS

ALTMETRICS

References

Christou, C., Jones, K., Pitta-pantazi, D., & Pittalis, M. (2007). 3D SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS. (July 2015).

De Araujo Diego, P. (2015). The virtual biology of sepsid flies: 3D computer graphics tools for researchin morphology, systematics and biomechanics.

Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2000). Identifying and Supporting Spatial Intelligence in Young Children. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(3), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2000.1.3.6

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). Design And Evaluate Research In Education. In How to design and evaluate research in education.

Hegarty, M. (2010). Components of Spatial Intelligence. Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, 52(C), 265–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(10)52007-3

Hilton, M. (2015). Preparing students for life and work. Issues in Science and Technology, 31(4), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393073

Hsiao-Cheng, H. A. N. (2015). Gamified Pedagogy: From Gaming Theory to Creating a Self-Motivated Learning Environment in Studio Art. Studies in Art Education, 56(3), 257–267. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=102221480&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Rimbatmojo, S., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Riyadi, R. (2017). Metacognition Difficulty of Students with Visual-Spatial Intelligence during Solving Open-Ended Problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012034

Šafranj, J., & Zivlak, J. (2018). Spatial-Visual Intelligence in Teaching Students of Engineering. Research in Pedagogy, 8(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.72

Starko, A. J. (1995). Creativity in the Classroom : School of Curious Deligh (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Pub.

Suprapto, P. K., bin Ahmad, M. Z., Chaidir, D. M., Ardiansyah, R., & Diella, D. (2018). Spatial intelligence and students’ achievement to support creativity on visuospatial-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14322

Suprapto, Purwati K., Rustaman, N. Y., Redjeki, S., & Rahmat, A. (2012). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Visuospatial (3D) Untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Kognitif Calon Guru Biologi Pada Konsep Anatomi Tumbuhan. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 17(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v17i1.235

Suprapto, Purwati K. (2016). PENGARUH MODEL WIMBA MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA 3DsMax TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR DAN PENALARAN LOGIS MAHASISWA CALON GURU BIOLOGI. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, (Vol 21, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA-Oktober 2016), 178–184. Retrieved from http://journal.fpmipa.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/article/view/828

Suryawati, E., Linggasari, M. N., & Arnentis, A. (2017). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge of Biology Prospective Teachers. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(3), 498. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i3.11270

Tabrani, P. (2012). Bahasa Rupa. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Vs7aAAAAMAAJ

Waldon, S. M., Thompson, P. M., Hahn, P. J., & Taylor, R. M. (2014). SketchBio: A scientist’s 3D interface for molecular modeling and animation. BMC Bioinformatics, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-334

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.