Women’s Social Autonomy in QS. At-Taubah [9]:71: A Comparative Study of Classical and Contemporary Qur’anic Exegesis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v10i2.33656

Keywords:

QS. At-Taubah [9]:71, Women’s Social Autonomy, Wilāyah, Qur’anic Exegesis, Social Responsibility

Abstract

This study examines the concept of women’s social autonomy in QS. At-Taubah [9]:71 through a comparative analysis of classical and contemporary Qur’anic exegesis. The verse establishes a framework of mutual responsibility between believing men and women through the concept of wilāyah and the shared obligation of amr ma‘rūf wa nahy munkar. This study employs a qualitative library-based approach grounded in thematic interpretation and comparative-interpretative analysis. The analysis focuses on selected classical exegetes, including al-Ṭabarī, Ibn Kathīr, and al-Qurṭubī, alongside contemporary interpretations by M. Quraish Shihab and Nasaruddin Umar. The findings show that classical tafsir consistently affirms the equality of moral and spiritual responsibility between men and women, although it does not extensively elaborate the social implications of this principle. Contemporary interpretations build on this foundation by articulating wilāyah as a non-hierarchical relational concept that supports women’s participation in social and religious life. The comparison indicates continuity in core ethical principles alongside a shift in interpretive emphasis toward social engagement. This study proposes a conceptual formulation of women’s social autonomy derived from the internal structure of the verse, integrating theological, social, and ethical dimensions. The analysis demonstrates that women’s social autonomy is grounded in Qur’anic ethics rather than external constructs, and provides a framework for understanding women’s participation in contemporary Muslim societies, particularly in Indonesia. The study contributes to Qur’anic studies by offering a systematic conceptualization of social autonomy based on comparative tafsir and by highlighting the relevance of Qur’anic ethical principles for ongoing discussions of gender and social responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. al-Tafsīr wa al-Mufassirūn. Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2000.

al-Shāṭibī, Abū Isḥāq. Al-Muwāfaqāt fī Uṣūl al-Sharīʿah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2004.

al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Al-Itqān fī ʿUlūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2003.

al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Ta’wīl Āy al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2001.

al-Farmāwī, ‘Abd al-Ḥayy. al-Bidāyah fī al-Tafsīr al-Mawḍū‘ī. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 2005.

al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Vol. 16. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1999.

al-Qaṭṭān, Mannā‘ Khalīl. Mabāḥith fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah, 1998.

al-Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf. Fiqh al-Awlawiyyāt. Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah.

———. Kayfa Nata‘āmal ma‘a al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 1999.

———. Min Fiqh al-Dawlah fī al-Islām. Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 1997.

al-Qurṭubī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Al-Jāmiʿ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2006.

———. Al-Jāmiʿ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah, 1964.

al-Zarkashī, Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Bahādir. Al-Burhān fī ʿUlūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1957.

al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah. Al-Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-ʿAqīdah wa al-Sharīʿah wa al-Manhaj. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 2009

Dzuhayatin, Siti Ruhaini. “Muslim Women, Agency and Social Change.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 10, no. 1 (2020): 1–24.

Dzuhayatin, Siti Ruhaini, dan Nur Rofiah. Nalar Kritis Muslimah: Refleksi atas Keperempuanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Keislaman. Yogyakarta: PSW UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2020.

———. al-Bidāyah fī al-Tafsīr al-Mawḍū‘ī. Cairo: Dār al-Ṭibā‘ah wa al-Nashr al-Islāmiyyah, 1977.

Ibn ‘Āshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Tunis: Dār al-Tunisiyyah li al-Nashr, 1984.

Ibn al-Qayyim. Iʿlām al-Muwaqqiʿīn ʿan Rabb al-ʿĀlamīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1991.

Ibn Kathīr, Ismā‘īl ibn ‘Umar. Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1998.

———. Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. Riyadh: Dār Ṭayyibah, 1999.

———. Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. Riyadh: Dār Ṭayyibah, 2000.

Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn Mukarram. Lisān al-‘Arab. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1990.

Natsir, Imron. “Gender Perspective in the Qur’an: A Thematic and Analytical Study of Equality and Roles.” Takafu: Journal of Tafsir and Gender Perspective 4, no. 1 (2024): 15–32.

Nisa, Eva F. “Muslim Women and Religious Authority in Indonesia.” Asian Studies Review 44, no. 2 (2020): 226–243.

Niswah, Irma Durrotun. “Women Empowerment in Qur’anic Perspective.” Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies 9, no. 1 (2021): 1–20.

Rafiq, Ahmad. “Women’s Religious Authority and Qur’anic Interpretation in Contemporary Indonesia.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 58, no. 2 (2020): 345–368.

Rofiah, Nur. Nalar Kritis Muslimah. Bandung: Mizan, 2020.

Rohmah, Nur. “Social Roles of Muslim Women in Qur’anic Perspective.” Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies 9, no. 1 (2021): 85–104.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

Umar, Nasaruddin. Argumen Kesetaraan Gender: Perspektif al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Paramadina, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Women’s Social Autonomy in QS. At-Taubah [9]:71: A Comparative Study of Classical and Contemporary Qur’anic Exegesis. (2025). TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 10(2), 212-230. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v10i2.33656

Similar Articles

1-10 of 124

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.