SCIENCE TEACHER ABILITY TO DESIGN STUDENT SPIRITUAL ATTITUDE INSTRUMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/biotik.v12i1.19309Keywords:
Assessment Instrument, Spiritual Attitude, Teacher AbilityAbstract
Each teacher must be able to harmonize the assessment of cognitive and psychomotor aspects with the assessment of students' affective aspects in learning. Most of the research conducted in Aceh is still limited to the development of spiritual attitude assessment instruments, while studies describing the ability of science teachers to design spiritual attitude assessment instruments are still very limited. This study aims to determine the ability of junior high school science teachers in the Pidie District to prepare questions to measure students' spiritual attitudes. The research uses the Mix method, with documentation and interview analysis techniques using the Miles and Huberman models, and the feasibility validity of the spiritual attitude assessment instrument uses a Likert scale and is then presented using percentage calculations. A purposive sampling technique is applied in determining the sample. The results showed that most of the teachers had less ability to design spiritual attitude assessment instruments. Few teachers could compile a comprehensive spiritual attitude assessment instrument per the attitude assessment technique in the 2013 curriculum. The first obstacle science teachers faced was formulating assessment indicators, where some teachers did not understand spiritual attitudes with social attitudes in learning. Secondly, assessment techniques with Rubik's or scoring guidelines were not in line with the demands of the 2013 curriculum.Downloads
References
S. Hidayat, Pengembangan Kurikulum Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.
Trianto, Model Pembelajaran terpadu: Konsep Strategi dan Implenetasi dalam Kurikulum KTSP. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011.
Mimin, Model Dan Teknik Penilaian Pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Referensi, 2013.
S. K. Tiara and E. Y. Sari, “Analisis Teknik Penilaian Sikap Sosial Siswa Dalam Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 Di SDN 1 Watulimo,” J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v11i1.11905.
N. Inayah, U. Rosidin, and I. Wahyudi, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kompetensi Sikap Spiritual dan Social dalam Pembelajaran Sains SMP,” J. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 129–139, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/10250
Sabaruddi, “Sekolah dengan Konsep Pendidikan Humanis,” Humanika, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–162, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v20i2.29306.
R. Y. M, “Pengaruh Perubahan Kurikulum 2013 Terhadap Perkembangan Peserta,” J. Log., vol. 18, no. 8, 2016.
S. E. Djiwandono, Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2006.
H. Oemar, Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2005.
Darmansyah, “Teknik Penilaian Sikap Spritual dan Sosial dalam Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar 08 Surau Gadang Nanggalo,” Al-Ta Lim J., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v21i1.67.
A. N. Said and D. Rahmawati, “Pengaruh Kecerdasan Intelektual, Kecerdasan Emosional Dan Kecerdasan Spiritual Terhadap Sikap Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Prodi Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta),” Nominal, Barom. Ris. akutansi dan Manaj., vol. 7, no. 1, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v7i1.19357.
H. Hariyatmi and A. F. Setyanto, “Kemampuan Guru IPA Dalam Penyusunan Penilaian Autentik di SMPN 1 Pecangan Jepara,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains V, Surakarta, 215AD, pp. 117–123.
N. Sujdana, Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2016.
M. Asbari, W. Nurhayati, and A. Purwanto, “The effect of parenting style and genetic personality on children character development,” J. Penelit. Dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 206–218, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.28151.
N. F. Lestari and N. Harjono, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter PPK Aspek Kemandirian Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Siswa SD Kelas 4,” J. Mimb. PGSD Undiksha, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v9i1.33379.
N. Nurhadi, U. Rosidin, and W. Suana, “Pengembangan Instrument Penilaian Sikap Spiritual Dan Sosial Pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu,” J. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 107–117, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/4881/3031
Purnamawati, “Analisis Kesulitan Guru dalam Melaksanakan Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 dan Alternatif Solusinya,” Lentera J. Diklat Keagamaan Padang, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53–54, 2020.
I. N. Fityana, Sarwanto, and Sugiyarto, “Pengembangan InstrumenPenilaian Autentik Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Proyek Untuk Siswa SMP/MTs Kelas VII,” J. Mater. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 23–27, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jmpf/article/view/31458
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with BIOTIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi dan Kependidikan agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
