Exploring Textuality and Reader Orientation: Unveiling Interpretative Tendencies in Understanding Nafs Wahidah in QS. Al-Nisa of the Qur'an

Mahbub Ghozali, Matsna Afwi Nadia

Abstract


The identification of the meaning of nafs wāḥidah, as produced by various interpretations through Adam, is claimed to be a biased interpretation mechanism based on certain orientations. This research aims to uncover the interpreters' orientation towards the text by situating the interpretation process as the interpreter's interaction with the text within a specific communication context. To achieve this objective, a qualitative method is employed in this research, utilizing a reception frame introduced by Wolfgang Iser. This study reveals that the interpreter's orientation towards specific meanings is constrained by the linguistic structure of the Qur'an, which has been schematized. This constraint on the interpreter's orientation occurs when seeking the contextual significance of the verse through syntagmatic and paradigmatic interconnections. The interpreter's relationship with the Qur'an within a specific communication context limits and shapes tendencies in the interpretation process, which is text-driven. In this context, the interpretation of the term nafs wāḥidah, in its various forms, does not exhibit any discernible biases towards producing meanings in alignment with the interpreter's preferences. Instead, the interpreter solely seeks contextual clues within the verse's structure, thereby associating the meaning of nafs wāḥidah with other terms in an interconnected context.

Keywords


nafs wāḥidah; QS. an-Nisa [4]: 1; orientations of meaning; receptions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abū al-Su’ūd al-’Imādī, Muḥammad bin Muḥammad. Irsyād Al-’Aql Al-Salīm Ilā Mazāyā Al-Kitāb Al-Karīm. Vol. 2. Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ at-Turāṡ al-’Arabī, n.d.

Abū Zahrah, Muḥammad bin Aḥmad. Zahrah Al-Tafāsīr. Vol. 3. Kairo: Dār al-Fikr al-’Arabī, n.d.

Afandi, Agus. ‘Bentuk-Bentuk Perilaku Bias Gender’. Journal of Gender and Children Studies 1, no. 1 (2019).

Akbar, Ahmad Fadly Rahman, Mahmud Rifaannudin, Muhammad Badrun, and Nuraini Maghfiroh Nuraini. ‘Nafs Wahidah Dalam Al-Qur’an Al-Karim Menurut Zaghlul Raghib Muhammad An-Najjar’. Zad Al-Mufassirin: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur’an & Tafsir 5, no. 1 (2023): 60–77.

Al-Alūsī, Maḥmūd bin ’Abd Allah. Rūḥ Al-Ma’ānī Fī Tafsīr Al-Qur’an Al-’Aẓīm Wa Al-Sab’i Al-Maṡānī. Vol. 2. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutb al-’Ilmīyah, 1415.

Al-Baiḍāwī, Abd Allah bin ’Umr. Anwār Al-Tanzīl Wa Asrār Al-Ta’wīl. Vol. 2. Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ al-’Arabī, 1418.

Al-Biqā’ī, Ibrāhīm bin ’Umar. Nażm Ad-Durar Fī Tanāsub Al-Āyāt Wa Al-Suwar. Vol. 5. Kairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī, n.d.

Al-Khāzin, ’Ali bin Muḥammad. Lubāb Al-Ta’wīl Fī Ma’ānī Al-Tanzīl. Vol. 1. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutb al-’Ilmīyah, 1415.

Al-Māturīdī, Muḥammad bin Muḥammad. Ta’wīlāt Ahl Al-Sunnah. Vol. 3. Beirut: Dār al-Kutb al-’Ilmīyah, 2005.

Al-Marāghī, Aḥmad bin Muṣṭafā. Tafsīr Al-Marāghī. Vol. 4. Mesir: Muṣṭafā al-Bāb al-Ḥalabī, 1946.

Al-Muhāsibī, al-Ḥariṡ bin Asad. Fahm Al-Qur’an Wa Ma’anīh. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1398.

Al-Nasafī, ’Abd Allah bin Aḥmad. Madārik Al-Tanzīl Wa Ḥaqā’iq Al-Ta’wīl. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kalm aṭ-Ṭīb, 1998.

Al-Qāsimī, Muḥammad Jamal al-Dīn. Maḥāsin Al-Ta’wīl. Vol. 3. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutb al-’Ilmīyah, 1418.

Al-Rāzī, Fakr al-Dīn. Mafātiḥ Al-Ghayb. Bairut: Dār Iḥyā’ at-Turāṡ al-’Arābī, 1420.

Al-Suyūṭī, ’Abd al-Raḥmān bin Abī Bakr. Al-Dur Al-Manṡūr Fī Al-Tafsīr Bi Al-Ma’ṡūr. Vol. 2. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.

Al-Sya’rāwī, Muḥammad Mutawallī. Khawāṭirī Ḥawl Al-Qur’ān Al-Karīm. Vol. 4. Mesir: Akhbār al-Yawm, 1991.

Al-Zamakhsyarī, Maḥmūd bin Umar. Tafsīr Al-Kasysyāf ’an Ḥaqā’iq Ghawāmiḍ Al-Tanzīl. Bairut: Dār al-Ma’ārif, 2009.

Al-Zuhaylī, Wahbah. Al-Tafsīr Al-Munīr Fī Al-’Aqīdah Wa Al-Sharī’ah Wa Al-Manhaj. Vol. 2. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 1991.

Al-Naisābūrī, al-Ḥasan bin Muḥammad. Gharā’ib Al-Qur’an Wa Raghā’ib Al-Furqān. Vol. 2. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutb al-’Ilmīyah, 1416.

Armstrong, Paul B. ‘The Neuroscience of Literary Time Travel: How Literary Works Cross Historical Distance’. Narrative 31, no. 3 (October 2023): 324–349.

Al-Sakhāwī, ’Alī bin Muḥammad. Tafsīr Al-Qur’an Al-’Aẓīm. Vol. 1. Kairo: Dār an-Nasyr li al-Jāma’āt, 2009.

Al-Samarqandī, Naṣr bin Muḥammad. Baḥr Al-’Ulūm. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kutb al-’Ilmīyah, 1993.

Al-Syaukānī, Muḥammad bin ’Alī. Fatḥ Al-Qadīr. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār Ibn Kathīr, 1414.

Al-Ṡa’ālibī, ’Abd al-Raḥmān bin Muḥammad. Al-Jawāhir Al-Ḥisān Fī Tafsīr Al-Qur’an. Vol. 2. Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ al-’Arabī, 1418.

Assyifa, Ummu Hani, and Mirwan Akhmad Taufiq. ‘Synchronic and Diacronic Analysis of the Word Zauj in the Al-Qur’an’. Journal of Arabic Language Studies and Teaching 1, no. 1 (2021): 59–74.

Al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad bin Jarīr. Jāmi’ Al-Bayān Fī Ta’wīl Āy Al-Qur’an. Vol. 7. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risālah, 2000.

Al-Ṭayyār, Musā’id bin Sulaimān. Fuṣūl Fī ’Uṣūl Al-Tafsīr. ar-Rayyān: Dār Ibn al-Jauzī, 1423.

Atasoy, Emrah. ‘From the Text to the Reader: An Application of Reader-Response Theory to Robert Browning’s “My Last Duchess”’. Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 7 (December 15, 2020): 196–209.

Al-Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd bin ’Umar. Al-Kashshāf ’an Ḥaqāiq Ghawāmiḍ Al-Tanzīl. Vol. 1. Bairut: Dār al-Kitāb al-Arabi, 1407.

Barlas, Asma. Believing Women in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Quran. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002.

Darwazah, Muḥammad Izzah. Al-Tafsīr Wa Al-Ḥadīṡ. Vol. 8. Kairo: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutb al-’Arabīyah, 1383.

Dror, Yehudit. ‘Verbs of Saying in the Qurʾān: The Case of Qāla’. Al-Qanṭara 42, no. 1 (July 6, 2021).

Duffy, Andrea. ‘Reorienting Orientalism: Ottoman Historiography and the Representation of Seventeenth-Century French Travelogues’. Tarih Dergisi, no. 73 (February 23, 2021): 53–76.

Holub, Robert C. Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. London: Methuen, 1984.

Ibn ’Āsyūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr Wa Al-Tanwīr. Vol. 22. Tunisia: al-Dār al-Tunisīyah li Nasyr, 1984.

Ibn ’Ajībah, Aḥmad bin Muhammad. Al-Baḥr Al-Madīd Fī Tafsīr Al-Qur’an Al-Majīd. Vol. 1. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutb al-’Ilmīyah, 2002.

Ibn Abī Ḥātim, Abd al-Raḥmān bin Muḥammad. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān Al-’Aẓīm. Vol. 3. Riyāḍ: Maktabah Nizār Muṣṭafā al-Bāz, 1419.

Ibn al-’Arabi, Abū Bakr. Qanūn Al-Ta’wīl. Beirūt: Mu’assasah ’Ulūm al-Qur’ān, 1986.

Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Translated by Der Akt des Lesens. London: Uoutledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.

Jawharī, ṬanṬawī. Al-Jawāhir Fī Tafsīr Al-Qur’an Al-Karīm. Vol. 3. Mesir: Muṣṭafā al-Bāb al-Ḥalabī, 1249.

Kaṡīr, Ismā’īl bin ’Umar bin. Tafsīr Al-Qur’an Al-’Aẓīm. Vol. 2. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutb al-’Ilmīyah, 1419.

Khader, Salwa Younes. ‘Functional Meaning and Choosing the Inflection of Models from the Holy Quran’. Journal of Alimam Aladham University college 42, no. 1 (2023).

Khalishah, Nailatul, and M. Fairuz Rosyid. ‘Feminism and Gender Equality in Islam Perspective of Al-Qur’an Tafsir (Study of Qur’anic Verses on Term Nafs Wahidah)’. International Conference on Islamic Studies (ICIS) (2023): 377–387.

Kodir, Faqihuddin Abdul. Qira’ah Mubadalah. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2019.

Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis (a Source Book of New Methods). Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications, 1984.

Mubarok, Husni. ‘Asal Penciptaan Perempuan Dalam Surat Al-Nisa’ Ayat 1 (Studi Komparatif Tafsir Feminis Nasaruddin Umar Dan Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir)’. IAIN Kudus, 2020.

Mubarok, Muhammad Parhan. ‘Hakikat Term Al-Nafs Dalam Al-Qur’an Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pendidikan’. Islamica 5, no. 2 (2022): 46–50.

Mujammil, Aris. ‘Penafsiran Nafsin Wahidah Perspektif Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir (Studi Analisis Tafsir Progresif Qirā’ah Mubādalah)’. UIN KH. Achmad Siddiq Jember, 2022.

Nawawi, M Anwar, Muhammad Zainuri, Balik Jaya AB, and Rosita Ibrahim. ‘Legal Verses About Women’s Dignity and Actualization of Gender Equality in the Family’. Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2023): 85–96.

Nuraini, Shinta. ‘Al-Quran Dan Penciptaan Perempuan Dalam Tafsir Feminis’. Hermeneutik: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 12, no. 1 (2019): 71.

Nurbaeti, Siti. ‘Pemahaman Feminis Muslim Indonesia Terhadap Ayat-Ayat Penciptaan Perempuan: Studi Komparasi Terhadap Tokoh Siti Musdah Mulia Dan Husein Muhammad’. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2022.

Riḍā, Muḥammad Rasyīd bin ’Alī. Tafsīr Al-Qur’an Al-Ḥakīm. Vol. 4. Kairo: al-Hay’ah al-Miṣriyah al-’Ammah li al-Kitāb, 1990.

Riḍā, Muḥammad Rasyīd bin ’Ali. Tafsir Al-Mannār. Mesir: al-Hay’ah al-Miṣriyah al-’Ammah li al-Kitāb, 1990.

Sama’un, Sama’un, and Ahmad Bahruddin. ‘Term Nafs Wahidah QS. Al-Nisa’ Ayat 1 Perspektif Taba’taba’i’. Safwah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 1, no. 1 (2023): 51–64.

Silverman, David. Doing Qualitative Research. New York: SAGE Publications, 2021.

Subhan, Zaitunah. Tafsir Kebencian: Studi Bias Gender Dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 1999.

Sulaimān, Muqātil bin. Tafsīr Muqātil Bin Sulaimān. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ, 1423.

Wadud, Amina. Qur’an and Woman: Rereading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

White, Marilyn Domas, and Emily E. Marsh. ‘Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology’. Library Trends 55, no. 1 (2006): 22–45.

Zulfa, Siti. ‘Semiotika Tafsir Nafs Wāḥidah (Studi Penafsiran q.s. Al-Nisā’[04]: 01, q.s. Al-an’ām[06]: 98, q.s. Al-a’rāf[07]: 198, q.s. Luqmān[31]: 28 Dan q.s. Al-Zumar[39]: 06 Perspektif Roland Barthes)’. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v8i2.20339

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Mahbub Ghozali, Matsna Afwi Nadia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

INDEX BY:






Journal Secretariat:
Al-Qur'an and Tafsir Department, 1st Floor, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh Indonesia. Jln. Syeikh Abdul Rauf, Kopelma Darussalam Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Post Code: 23111.
Email: tafse@ar-raniry.ac.id

TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies, e-ISSN: 2775-5339, p-ISSN: 2620-4185 

View My Stats