Studi Kritik Hadis Perspektif Jonathan A.C. Brown (Analisis terhadap Three Tiered Method)
Abstract
This article aims to present the formulation of the hadith authenticity method formulated by Jonathan A. C. Brown in his theory named the Three-Tiered Method. This investigation is carried out through three steps; First, demands for a source of hadith, second, evaluates the reliability of that source, third, seeks corroboration for the hadith. Brown also argues that the third step is considered pivotal in hadith criticism. The more sources of the report, the more credible the report is. In the theory of historical evaluation of western scholar, such belief is called the criterion of multiple attestation. Briefly, quantity changes lead to quality changes. Therefore, the author's reflection on the issue relating to the hadith about the suggestion to wear a white dress (which has been criticise using this theory) proves this hadith to be authentic.
Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mempresentasikan formulasi metode autentisitas hadis yang dirumuskan oleh Jonathan A. C. Brown melalui teorinya Three Tiered Method. Investigasi hadis diaplikasikan dalam tiga langkah. Pertama, tuntutan adanya sumber hadis. Kedua, mengevaluasi keterpercayaan sumber hadis. Ketiga, mencari penguat sebuah hadis. Brown berpendapat bahwa langkah ketiga dianggap cukup krusial dalam kritik hadis. Semakin banyak sumber laporan maka akan muncul kepercayaan yang tinggi terhadap laporan tersebut. Dalam evaluasi historis versi Sarjana Barat, hal ini disebut kriteria pengesahan berganda (the criterion of multiple attestation). Pendek kata, kuantitas akan berubah menuju kualitas. Refleksi penulis dalam kasus hadis tentang anjuran berpakaian putih menggunakan teori tersebut membuktikan bahwa hadis ini otentik
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abū ‘Amr, Uṡmān ibn Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Utsmān al-Kurdī, al-Syahr Zuri. Ṣiyānah Ṣaḥiḥ Muslim Min Al-Ikhlāl Wa al-Ghalṭ Wa Himāyatuh Min al-Isqāṭ Wa al-Saqṭ. II. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islamī, 1408.
Aʻẓamī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafā. On Schacht’s Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, 1985.
Al-‘Asqalānī, Ibn Ḥajar. Al-Iṣābah Fī Tamyīz Aṣ-Ṣaḥābah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.
Al-Baghdādī, Abū Bakr Aḥmad ‘Alī bin Ṡābit al-Khatīb. Al-Faṣl Li al-Waṣli al-Mudraj Fī al-Naql. Kairo: Dār Ibn al-Jauzi, n.d.
Al-Bustī, Muḥammad Abū Ḥātim bin Ḥibbān. Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān. Kairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif, 1952.
Al-Mizzī, Yūsuf bin az-Zakkī ‘Abd al-Raḥman Abū al-Ḥajjāj. Tahẓīb Al-Kamāl. Beirut: Mu’assasah ar-Risālah, 1988.
Al-Qaraḍawī, Yūsuf. Kaifa Nata‘āmal Ma‘a As-Sunnah An-Nabawiyyah. Kairo: Dār asy-Syūrūq, 2004.
Al-Sijistānī, Al-Imām al-Ḥāfiẓ Abū Dāwud Sulaimān bin Al-Asy‘aṡ. Sunan Abī Dāwud. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, n.d.
Al-Ṭabrānī, Abū al-Qāsim. Al-Mu‘jam al-Ṣagīr. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1981.
Al-Turmuẓī, Abū ‘Īsā Muḥammad bin ‘Īsā bin S. Sunan At-Turmūẓī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1971.
Amin, Kamaruddin. Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Hikmah Mizan Publika, 2009.
Amrulloh, A. “EKSISTENSI KRITIK MATAN MASA AWAL: Membaca Temuan Dan Kontribusi Jonathan Brown.” Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 4, no. 1 (August 1, 2015): 1-26–26. https://doi.org/10.21274/kontem.2016.4.1.1-26.
“An Introduction to the Science of Hadith : Ibn Al-Salah Al-Shahrazuri : 9781859641583.” Accessed April 4, 2020. https://www.bookdepository.com/Introduction-Science-Hadith-Ibn-Al-Salah-Al-Shahrazuri/9781859641583.
An-Nasā’ī, Aḥmad bin Syua‘aib. As-Sunan al-Kubrā. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1990.
As-Suyūṭī, ‘Abd ar-Raḥmān ibn Abū Bakr. Tadrīb Al-Rāwī Fi Syarḥ Taqrīb al-Nawawī. Riyad: Maktabah al-Riyad al-Ḥadīṡah, n.d.
Asy-Syahrazurī, Abū ‘Amr Uṡmān bin ‘Abd ar-Raḥmān. ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ Li-Ibn Aṣ-Ṣalāḥ. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-Mu‘āṣir, 1998.
Aż-Żahabī, Syams ad-Dīn Abū ʿAbdallāh Muḥammad bin Aḥmad bin ʿUṡmān ibn Qāymāẓ bin ʿAbdallāh al-Turkumānī al-Fāriqī al-Dimashqī Al-Shāfiʿī. Siyār A‘lām an-Nubalā. Beirut: Muassasah ar-Risālah, 2001.
Bin Jamā’ah, Muḥammad bin Ibrahīm. Al-Manḥaj Ar-Rāwī Fī Mukhtaṣar ‘Ulūm al-Hadīṡ an-Nabāwī. II. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr1406, n.d.
Brown, Jonathan AC. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. Oneworld Publications, 2017.
———. Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet’s Legacy. Simon and Schuster, 2014.
———. The Canonization of Al-Bukhari and Muslim: The Formation and Function of the Sunni Hadith Canon Canon. Brill, 2007.
Goldziher, Ignác. Muslim Studies, Vol. 1. SUNY Press, 1967.
Hallaq, Wael B. “The Authenticity of Prophetic Ḥadîth: A Pseudo-Problem.” Studia Islamica, no. 89 (1999): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1596086.
Ibn Ḥanbal, Aḥmad. Musnad Imām Aḥmad Bin Ḥanbal. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri, n.d.
Ismail, M Syuhudi. Kaidah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1998.
“Jonathan Brown | Georgetown University - Academia.Edu.” Accessed April 4, 2020. https://georgetown.academia.edu/JonathanACBrown/CurriculumVitae.
Muhammad (pbuh) - Prophet of Islam. “Jonathan Brown on Being Inspired by Prophet Muhammad - Ahsen Utku.” Accessed April 4, 2020. http://www.lastprophet.info/jonathan-brown-on-being-inspired-by-prophet-muhammad.
Juynboll, G. H. A. “Muslim Tradition: Studies in Chronology, Provenance and Authorship of Early Hadith,” 1983. https://doi.org/10.2307/601625.
Juynboll, Gautier HA. Studies on the Origins and Uses of Islamic Hạdīth. Vol. 550. Variorum Publishing, 1996.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. A Textbook of Hadith Studies: Authenticity, Compilation, Classification and Criticism of Hadith. Kube Publishing Ltd, 2014.
Kamaruddin, Kamaruddin. “Kritik M. Mustafa Azami Terhadap Pemikiran Para Orientalis Tentang Hadis Rasulullah.” Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 11, no. 1 (May 1, 2011): 217–36. https://doi.org/10.21154/al-tahrir.v11i1.33.
Masrur, Ali. Teori common link G.H.A. Juynboll. Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Sosial (LKIS), 2007. https://www.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Wb8vvuey8hoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=ali+masrur&ots=fxjTrMzghJ&sig=V-78N7Ube2mlXC0xoaMVQucEZI8.
Motzki, Harald. The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence: Meccan Fiqh Before the Classical Schools. BRILL, 2002.
Motzki, Harald, Nicolet Boekhoff-van der Voort, and Sean W. Anthony. Analysing Muslim Traditions: Studies in Legal, Exegetical and Maghāzī Ḥadīth. BRILL, 2009.
Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research. “Our Mission.” Accessed April 4, 2020. https://yaqeeninstitute.org/about-us/our-mission/.
Schacht, J. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Sunnah Syi’ah Begandengan Tangan! Mungkinkah? Kajian Atas Konsep Ajaran Dan Pemikiran. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2007.
Siddīqī, Muhammad Zubayr. Hadits Literature: Its Origin, Development, Special Features and Criticism. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2006.
Taha. “The Hadith Critical Methodology: A Brief Look at How Hadith Are Authenticated in the Islamic Tradition.” Pondering Islam (blog), January 1, 2015. https://ponderingislam.com/2015/01/01/the-hadith-critical-methodology-a-brief-look-at-how-hadith-are-authenticated-in-the-islamic-tradition/.
Yakub, Ali Musthafa. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2008.
Zuhri, Muh. “PERKEMBANGAN KAJIAN HADIS KESARJANAAN BARAT.” ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam 16, no. 2 (December 30, 2015): 215–34. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v16i2.3182.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/substantia.v22i1.6853
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Arif Budiman, Edi Safri, Novizal Wendry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SUBSTANTIA: JURNAL ILMU-ILMU USHULUDDIN
DITERBIKAN OLEH:
FAKULTAS USHULUDDIN DAN FILSAFAT
UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI (UIN) AR-RANIRY BANDA ACEH, ACEH INDONESIA
ALAMAT REDAKSI:
Gedung Fakultas Ushuluddin Lantai II, Fakultas Ushuluddin, UIN Ar-Raniry, Jln. Lingkar Kampus, Kopelma Darussalam Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111.Telp. (0651)7551295. eMail: substantia.adm@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.