Email this article 
Student-teacher relationship: Written feedback provision and writing performance
Abstract
Despite several studies on feedback, little is known about the benefits of the student-teacher relationship in providing feedback. This study therefore aimed to investigate the effects of teacher feedback on students' writing performance. The feedback was divided into two formats: Direct Feedback and Indirect Feedback. Students' writing performance in the study refers to the quality of students' writing when composing a descriptive paragraph. In addition, this study also explored the voices of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students after being treated with different feedback modes under specific circumstances of the student-teacher relationship. The study adopted a mixed methods design, using a test, a semi-structured interview and a questionnaire as instruments to obtain qualitative and quantitative data. The study involved 50 secondary school students who were divided into two groups of 25 students each. The results showed that direct feedback stimulated students' writing performance better than indirect feedback. In addition, the feedback treatments could maximize students' writing performance if a good student-teacher relationship was developed in the classroom. This implies that maintaining a good student-teacher relationship in the EFL classroom is beneficial.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ackerman, D. S., & Gross, B. L. (2010). Instructor Feedback : How Much Do Students Really Want ? Journal of Marketing Education, 32(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475309360159
Akpinar, M. (2018). Feedback strategies which social sciences teachers give to their students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 1317–1327. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060623
Al Nasseri, Y. S., Renganathan, L., Al Nasseri, F., & Al Balushi, A. (2014). Impact of Students-Teacher Relationship on Student’s Learning: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Nursing Education, 6(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0974-9357.6.1.034
Aliyu, M. M. (2020). Exploring the nature of undergraduates’ peer collaboration in a PBL writing process. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.8406
Alodwan, T. A. A., & Ibnian, S. S. K. (2014). The Effect of Using the Process Approach to Writing on Developing University Students’ Essay Writing Skills in EFL Dr. Talal Abd Alhameed Alodwan 1 and Dr. Salem Saleh Khalaf Ibnian 2. Review of Arts and Humanities, 3(2), 139–155.
Barnett, R. (2007). Assesment in Higher Education. An impossible mission? In D. B. and N. F. Falchikof (Ed.), Rethinking assesment in higher education (pp. 29–40). Routledge.
Bijami, M., Pandian, A., & Singh, M. K. M. (2016). The Relationship between Teacher’s Written Feedback and Student’s’ Writing Performance: Sociocultural Perspective. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.1p.59
Blake, J. (2020). Genre-specific Error Detection with Multimodal Feedback. RELC Journal, 51(1), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219898282
Boekaerts, M. (2010). The crucial role of motivation and emotion in classroom learning. In and F. B. H. Dummont, D. Instance (Ed.), The Nature of Learning: using research to inspire parctice. (pp. 91–111). OECD.
Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assesment as if learning is important. In D. B. and N. Falchikof (Ed.), Rethingking assesment in higher education (pp. 14–25). Routledge.
Brody, H., & Santos, J. (2019). Helping Students Engage with Written Feedback. Journal of Instructional Research, 8(2), 110–112. https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2019.8.2.16
Budianto, S., Sulistyo, T., Widiastuti, O., Heriyawati, D. F., & Marhaban, S. (2020). Written corrective feedback across different levels of efl students’ academic writing proficiency: Outcomes and implications. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16569
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2010). Studies in Higher Education Developing sustainable feedback practices Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
Casey, A. M., & Mcwilliam, R. A. (2008). Graphical Feedback to IncreaseTeachers ’ Use of Incidental Teaching. Journal of Early Intervebtion, 30(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815108319038
Casey, A. M., & Mcwilliam, R. A. (2011). The Characteristics and Effectiveness of Feedback Intervention Applied in Early Childhood Settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121410368141
Chen, W., & Liu, G. Q. (2021). Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback: Teachers’ Perspectives. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2021.120974
Crossman, J. (2007). The role of relationship and emotions on student perceptions of learning and assesment. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(3).
Davoodifard, M. (2022). An Overview of Writing Process Research: Towards a Better Understanding of L2 Writing Process. 21(2), 1–20.
Farhah, I., Saleh, A. Y., & Safitri, S. (2021). The role of student-teacher relationship to teacher subjective well-being as moderated by teaching experience. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(2), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i2.18330
Firdaus, F. H. (2015). Teacher praises and students engagement level in EFL classroom (A case study of seventh grade students at one of junior high school in Bandung). Journal of English and Education, 2015(2), 28–40. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/192528-EN-teacher-praises-and-students-engagement.pdf
Gibbs, G. (2010). Understanding arts and humanities. Students’ experiences of assesssment and feedback. Sage, 12(1), 36–56.
Goldouz, E., & Baleghizadeh, S. (2021). Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions about the most serious types of written errors and the most effective feedback types to treat them. Mextesol Journal, 45(1), 0–2.
Graham, B. (2015). Providing effective formative feedback. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 7(1), 35–39. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1230682%0Ahttp://files/1529/Education, 2015 - 2015 - Providing Effective Formative Feedback.pdf
Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-krause, D., & Neil, J. (2010). Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy. TESOL QUARTERLY, 44(1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). Review of Educational The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hempel, P. S. (2008). Chinese reactions to performance feedback: Non-task attributions of feedback intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(2), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411108091758.
Hershkovitz, A. (2018). The student-teacher relationship in one-to-one computing classroom. Paginás de Educación, 11(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.22235/pe.v11i1.1553
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy : Language , literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Iqbal, Z., Courtney, M., & Rashid, N. (2019). Understanding Student-Teacher Relationships and the Passive-Aggressive Behavior of Students: Reduction of Malevolence in Pakistani Classrooms. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 5(1), 233–255.
Irwin, B. (2018). Written Corrective Feedback: Student Preferences and Teacher Feedback Practices. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.2.02
Isnawati, I., Sulistyo, G. H., Widiati, U., & Suryati, N. (2019). Impacts of teacher-written corrective feedback with teacher-student conference on students’ revision. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12143a
Karlsson, M. (2019). An analysis of the relationship among teacher feedback, feedforward, and grade on Swedish university students’ compositions in English as a second language. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.1
Khaki, M., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2021). Assessing the effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback in process-based vs product-based instruction on learners’ writing. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 21, 35–53. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.21.03
Khodadadi, S. (2021). The effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ grammatical accuracy in sentence completion exercises. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903423
Kusumaningrum, S. R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Prayogo, J. A. (2019). The Effect of Different Types of Peer Feedback Provision on EFL Students ’ Writing Performance. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12114a
Monteiro, V., Carvalho, C., & Santos, N. N. (2021). Creating a Supportive Classroom Environment Through Effective Feedback: Effects on Students’ School Identification and Behavioral Engagement. Frontiers in Education, 6(June), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.661736
Perks, B. J., Colpitts, B. D. F., & Michaud, M. (2021). The Role of Individual Preferences in the Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in an English for Academic Purposes Writing Course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n10.1
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
Ramberg, J., Låftman, S. B., Almquist, Y. B., & Modin, B. (2019). School effectiveness and students’ perceptions of teacher caring: A multilevel study. Improving Schools, 22(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480218764693
Saragih, N. A., Madya, S., Siregar, R. A., & Saragih, W. (2021). Written Corrective Feedback : Students ’ Perception. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(2), 676–690.
Sherpa, S. Z. (2021). Effects of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on bhutanese learners’ grammatical accuracy over time. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 574–603.
Siswanto, I. L., & Kuswandono, P. (2020). Understanding Teacher Identity Construction: Professional Experiences of Becoming Indonesian Montessori Teachers. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i1.539
Sulistyo, T. (2018). The Use of Blog-Assisted Language Learning to Improve EFL Learners’ Writing Performance. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sulistyo, T., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2017). Reformulation , Text Modeling , and the Development of EFL Academic Writing. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(1), 1–16.
Sulistyo, T., Sholeh, A., & Sari, N. (2021). Teacher multimodal feedback : Investigating students ’ preferences and voices. English Teaching Journal, 9(2), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.11591/etj.v9i2.10759
Tahira, M., Yousaf, I., & Haider, A. G. (2022). A comparison of diversity in the writing processes of writers: Implications for teaching of writing in Pakistan. IJCI International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(2), 1222–1232.
Valizadeh, M., & Soltanpour, F. (2021). Focused direct corrective feedback: Effects on the elementary english learners’ written syntactic complexity. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911207
Xiao, Y. (2008). Applying metacognition in EFL writing instruction in China. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(1), 19–33.
Yusuf, F. N., Widiati, U., & Sulistyo, T. (2017). Multimodal feedback provision in improving pre-service teachers’ competence. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8126
Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and Student Attitudes toward Teacher Feedback. RELC Journal, 38(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206076157
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ej.v12i1.23104
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
